Worksheet: Critical Reading

Due Tuesday by 11:59pm Points 50 Submitting a file upload File Types doc, docx, pdf, and rtf

Critical Reading Worksheet

Start Assignment

ARTH 3010

WORKSHEET: CRITICAL READING

INSTRUCT IONS Be sure to watch this week's lectures (https://utah.instructure.com/courses/976764/pages/module-3-learning-materials) in preparation for completing the Critical Reading Worksheet--they will help prepare you for the assignment!

Click Here to Download: ARTH 3010 Critical Reading Worksheet (https://utah.instructure.com/courses/976764/files/164537139?wrap=1)

(https://utah.instructure.com/courses/976764/files/164537139/download?download_frd=1)

Download the worksheet linked above & fill it out to the best of your ability. Reach out to your instructor or TA if you have questions! Once you have completed all of the sections, please save & retitle the file with your name (e.g. "YourName_CriticalReading.docx") Upload your file to this assignment to submit.



   

2024/9/2 13:18 Module 3: Critical Reading Worksheet

https://utah.instructure.com/courses/976764/assignments/14486619?module_item_id=24987982 1/3

Criteria Ratings Pts

10 pts

10 pts

10 pts

10 pts

Thesis 10 to >9.0 pts Excellent

Correctly identifies and comprehensively describes the author’s primary thesis.

9 to >8.0 pts Good

Correctly identifies the author’s primary thesis, but description may be overly general or miss a minor aspect of the argument.

8 to >7.0 pts Needs Improvement

Identifies an important element of the author’s argument but may miss the primary thesis.

7 to >1.0 pts Poor

Fails to identify the thesis of the article.

1 to >0 pts Insufficient

No response submitted.

Visual Evidence

10 to >9.0 pts Excellent

Correctly identifies and thoroughly describes 2 specific instances of visual analysis (for 2 different works of art) used to support the interpretation.

9 to >8.0 pts Good

Correctly identifies and describes 2 specific instances of visual analysis (for 2 different works of art) used to support the interpretation, but descriptions may not be thorough.

8 to >7.0 pts Needs Improvement

Identifies and describes 2 specific instances of visual analysis (for 2 different works of art), but may not clearly relate these to the thesis and/or descriptions may be incomplete.

7 to >1.0 pts Poor

Does not identify and/or describe 2 instances of visual analysis for 2 different works of art.

1 to >0 pts Insufficient

No response submitted.

Historical Evidence

10 to >9.0 pts Excellent

Correctly identifies and thoroughly describes 2 specific pieces of evidence used to support the interpretation.

9 to >8.0 pts Good

Correctly identifies and describes 2 specific pieces of evidence used to support the interpretation, but descriptions may not be thorough.

8 to >7.0 pts Needs Improvement

Identifies and describes 2 specific pieces of evidence, but some identifications may be unrelated to the thesis and/or descriptions may be incomplete.

7 to >1.0 pts Poor

Does not identify and/or describe 2 pieces of evidence.

1 to >0 pts Insufficient

No response submitted.

Sources 10 to >9.0 pts Excellent

Lists two source texts and successfully

9 to >8.0 pts Good

Lists two source texts but may have minor

8 to >7.0 pts Needs Improvement

Lists two source texts but has

7 to >1.0 pts Poor

Does not list two source texts, and/or

1 to >0 pts Insufficient

No response submitted.

2024/9/2 13:18 Module 3: Critical Reading Worksheet

https://utah.instructure.com/courses/976764/assignments/14486619?module_item_id=24987982 2/3

Total Points: 50

Criteria Ratings Pts

10 pts

relates each to the argument of the text.

lapses in relating them to the argument of the text.

difficulty relating them to the argument of the text.

has major difficulty relating them to the argument of the text.

Conclusions 10 to >9.0 pts Excellent

Thoughtfully reflects on the author’s success in defending their thesis, and comprehensively describes how they reached their conclusion.

9 to >8.0 pts Good

Reflects on the author’s success in defending their thesis, and describes how they reached their conclusion. Reflection and description may be general or superficial.

8 to >7.0 pts Needs Improvement

Either the reflection on the author’s success in defending their thesis or the description of how they reached their conclusion may be absent or overly difficult to comprehend.

7 to >1.0 pts Poor

Does not reflect on the author’s success in defending their thesis, and does not describe how they reached their conclusion.

1 to >0 pts Insufficient

No response submitted.

2024/9/2 13:18 Module 3: Critical Reading Worksheet

https://utah.instructure.com/courses/976764/assignments/14486619?module_item_id=24987982 3/3