wk5 discussion
brwnsugar62
- Consider the scenario:
- A research paper claims a meaningful contribution to the literature based on finding statistically significant relationships between predictor and response variables. In the footnotes, you see the following statement, “given this research was exploratory in nature, traditional levels of significance to reject the null hypotheses were relaxed to the .10 level.”
By Day 3
Post your response to the scenario in which you critically evaluate this footnote. As a reader/reviewer, what response would you provide to the authors about this footnote?
5 years ago
5
Answer(0)
other Questions(10)
- Discussion 1 Week 2 Whomever assist me with this can help with rough draft and final next
- CIS242 Homework
- Discussion WK 2
- PSY 605 Week 5 DQ1
- Financial Reporting - Horizontal & Vertical Analysis
- Gulf Real Estate Properties, Inc. is a real estate firm located in southwest Florida
- home not
- humanity questions 1135 5
- write a comment about a powerpoint
- Wk 5 dis intro to bus
