WEEK6 RESP DIS
SEE ATTACHED
2 years ago
10
GradDiscussionRubric.pdf
week6DISRESPMBA.docx
GradDiscussionRubric.pdf
TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric
Criteria No Submission
0 points
Novice (Criterion is missing or not
in evidence) 1-13 points
Basic (works towards meeting
expectations; performance needs
improvement) 14-16 points
Proficient (meets expectations;
performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points
Exemplary (exceeds expectations;
performance is outstanding) 19-20 points
Support of Week's Reading
No Student Submission (0 points)
Does not refer to the readings to support postings
(1-13 points)
Alludes to the readings to support postings
(14-16 points)
Refers to examples from the readings to support postings
(17-18 points)
Provides concrete examples from the readings to support postings;
integrates prior readings in postings
(19-20 points)
Observations No Student Submission (0 points)
Does not integrate personal observations or knowledge;
does not present new observations (1-13 points)
Integrates personal observations and
knowledge in a cursory manner; does not
present new observations
(14-16 points)
Integrates personal observations and knowledge in an accurate way; presents
new observations (17-18 points)
Integrates personal observations and knowledge in an accurate and
highly insightful way; presents new observations
(19-20 points)
Response to Classmates
No Student Submission
(0 points)
Responds in a cursory manner to classmates’
postings (1-13 points)
Constructively responds to classmates’ postings
(14-16 points)
Constructively responds to classmates’ postings; offers
insight that encourages other students to think critically
about their own work. (17-18 points)
Constructively responds to classmates’ postings; masterfully connects the material presented in classmates’ postings to their
responses; encourages classmates to think critically about their own
work. (19-20 points)
Organization, Word Choice, and Sentence
Structure
No Student Submission
(0 points)
Posts are disorganized and information is not presented in a logical sequence; word
choice and sentence structure are not suitable
(1-13 points)
Posts are somewhat disorganized, and information is not
presented in a logical sequence; word choice and sentence structure
are not suitable (14-16 points)
Posts are organized, and information is presented in a
logical sequence; word choice and sentence
structure are suitable; there are a few errors; however,
errors do not affect readability.
(17-18 points)
Posts are organized and information is presented in a
logical sequence; word choice and sentence structure are suitable;
no errors in the response. (19-20 points)
References No Student Submission
(0 points)
Includes no sources to support conclusions
(1-13 points)
Includes 1 outside source to support and enrich the discussion;
Includes 2 or more outside sources to support and enrich the discussion;
sources are properly cited in
Includes 2 or more outside sources to support and enrich the discussion; sources are cited using
APA format; style guidelines are
TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric
sources are not properly cited in APA format
(14-16 points)
APA format and are properly integrated into the discussion
response (17-18 points)
masterfully integrated into the discussion response.
(19-20 points)
week6DISRESPMBA.docx
Please respond (YOUR THOUGHTS) to the two PEER below discussions. Cite references in APA format.
1. MW.
What do you think your brand image is in terms of quality and value to your consumer? Are you high-end, low-end, or in-between? Explain as it relates to your major competitor. As far as branding is concerned our product would be more of a high-end brand in its perspective field. In terms of how it is viewed, its qualities and value would far exceed its competitors due to the nature of its effects on the body. Chemotherapy produces harmful effects on the body while in treatment, however. When it comes to our product there are no drawbacks.
Given the image you want to project and where you are in the Product Life Cycle (studied in previous modules), what type of pricing scheme do you think you should use (e.g., prestige pricing, penetration pricing, skimming pricing, bundle pricing, odd-even, value, etc.)? Why will this scheme work best for your target market? For our product, the best strategy would be penetration pricing—the reason why the long-term benefits would out way the cost. An example would be making it a cheaper alternative that undercuts the already established methods while reaching a wider audience. In addition, we can bill insurance companies to make up for the cheaper out-of-pocket cost.
What do you think your final price might be for this product? Provide a realistic range and discuss why. When it comes to pricing, we have to look at our competition and adjust from there. “Depending on the drug and type of cancer it treats, the average monthly cost of chemo drugs can range from $1,000 to $12,000. If a cancer patient requires four chemo sessions a year, it could cost them up to $48,000 total, which is beyond the average annual income” (Selby, 2019). To undercut the price of chemotherapy, I would say our price should range from $750- $10,000, with a total of $40,000. The reason why I’ve decided on this is due to the recoupment our company will receive in the future. Keeping the prices low will encourage more patients plus the added benefit of more advantageous health results.
References:
Selby, K. (2019, December 9). High Cost of Cancer Treatment. Asbestos. https://www.asbestos.com/featured-stories/high-cost-of-cancer-treatment/
2.EH. Brand image is essential when introducing a new product; it can evoke an emotional response from consumers if they are already familiar with the brand (Donnelly, 2018) . One way our product evokes a positive image is by brand storytelling. Brand storytelling is when consumers share their thoughts and times when they have played the game; happy times, including bonding exercise games for organizations, can evoke positive stories that are told to others or recanted with those who have played the game (Hong, Yang, Ross Wooldridge, & Bhappu, 2022). The brand storytelling further invites others to purchase the products to mimic the consumer's good time that they had. Cards Against Humanity's brand image is one that consumers know will have fun but with some corporate lingo humor. The value the game will bring to consumers is they can replay the game whenever they want; it is a work-appropriate version, so not only does the organization that purchased the game gain value due to the continuous usage and teambuilding to make more substantial teams, the players gain value by being able to enjoy time with their workmates. Cards Against Humanity is on the higher end of the spectrum than our competitors. One of our major competitors is Exploding Kittens; they sell its game for around $20, and our game will sell at $39 per edition (SkyPigGames, 2024). However, our game is marketed to corporations that need a game that has humor, is well-known, and can be used continuously; we are also offering a corporate pricing model that allows them to purchase in bulk at a discount, whereas other games do not.
Our product is in the introduction product life cycle, and penetration pricing strategies would be the most cost-effective for our product. Penetration pricing allows us to enter the market at a lower price, which would help to increase sales with consumers and help spread the product by word of mouth (Bertrand, Naila, & Georges, 2020). Penetration pricing would also allow us to increase the price over time to cover costs (Donnelly, 2018). Cards Against Humanity is a well-known name; however, this is a new product with the company that must be marketed to professional organizations that are only aware of the other games we manufacture, hence the penetration pricing model.
The final price for the product will be around $39. The price will cover the initial manufacturing and overhead costs. The product is in a high range compared with our competitors. Card games typically cost between $15 and $40 (SkyPigGames, 2024). What sets ours apart from the competitors and explains the price is that they are tailored to professional organizations that can purchase bundled products.
References
Bertrand, C., Naila, H., & Georges, Z. (2020). Existence and characterization of optimal dynamic pricing strategies with reference-price effects. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 28(2), 441-459. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-019-00645-w
Donnelly, J. (2018). A Preface to Marketing Management. (15th). U.S: McGraw-Hill Higher Education. Retrieved from https://reader2.yuzu.com/books/9781260300147
Hong, J., Yang, J., Ross Wooldridge, B., & Bhappu, A. D. (2022). Sharing consumers’ brand storytelling: influence of consumers’ storytelling on brand attitude via emotions and cognitions. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 31(2), 265-278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-07-2019-2485
SkyPigGames. (2024, February 4). Games Like Cards Against Humanity. Retrieved from Sky PIg Games: https://skypiggames.com/blogs/game-reviews/9-best-games-like-cards-against-humanity#:~:text=Exploding%20Kittens%20%E2%80%93%20Strategic%20Card%20Game%20with%20a%20Twist&text=The%20original%20edition%20is%20priced,suspense%20without%20a%20lengthy%20commitm