Week # 6

Use ERAS as the PICOT 

 
Rubric Introduction

Introduction missing many important aspects of the definition and descriptions of the topic. No definition or description is present = 0 points
0 points

Introduction missing some important aspects of the definition and descriptions of the topic. Minimal definition or description is present
6 points

Introduction is missing one important aspect of the definition and description of the topic
8 points

One page in length. Identify area of clinical interest based on professional expertise. Discuss PICO and frame clinical question.
10 points

Description of the practice problem & statistical relevancy

Does not elaborate on the statistical relevancy of the issue.
0 points

Elaborate on minimal statistical relevancy of the issue.
10 points

Some mentions of the statistical relevancy present but superficial.
19 points

Clearly identify the statistical relevance of the problem, including the demographic affected by the issue, the cost related with the issue, etc.
25 points

Annotated Bibliography

Either included only one or two professional resource; or scholarly references did not support the clinical problem completely. The annotated bibliography on each of original research articles that did not relate the research to the clinical problem. Summary was overall not adequate
0 points

Included minimal professional resource; or scholarly references did not support the clinical problem completely. The annotated bibliography on each of original research articles that did not relate the research to the clinical problem. Summary was overall not adequate
10 points

Either Included less than 5 professional resources or resources did not support the clinical problem completely. The annotated bibliography on each of 5 original research articles that did not clearly relate the research to the clinical problem. Summary was conducted but clarity was lacking is some aspects
13 points

Clearly and succinctly synthesize the literature related to the identified clinical problem in an annotated bibliography format (see example). Provide a summary of a minimum of 5 scholarly references in the annotated bibliography including at least one peer-reviewed regarding the proposed approaches to the identified clinical problem; includes one paragraph that briefly summarizes the reference, a second paragraph about the strengths and weaknesses of the reference, and a third paragraph about the potential importance and usefulness of this reference to your DNP project. Each entry should include: a. The citation of the reference in APA format (this is your level 2 heading for each entry) b. A brief summary of the reference related to the identified clinical problem and PICOT question c. Any statistical component found (sample size, cost, number of people affected, etc.) d. Strengths and weaknesses of the reference e. Potential importance and usefulness of this reference to your DNP project
17 points

References Page

Less than 4 resources correctly referenced.
0 points

Less than 5 resources correctly referenced.
3 points

A minimum of 6 resources correctly referenced.
4 points

All resources correctly referenced
5 points

APA format

APA formatting contains multiple errors and/or several citations are missing.
0 points

APA formatting contains some errors and/or several citations are missing.
5 points

3-5 errors in APA format and/or 1-2 citations are missing.
8 points

APA format correct with no more than 1-2 minor errors.
10 points