Week 4 ITM

dianarioza21

Main

Home >Homework Answsers >English homework help

Paper write

Include contact information so the designated agent can

6 hours ago
01.08.2026
10

Report issue

files (3)

week4.docx
Week4Assignment-ITMG371B001Summer2026-APEI.pdf
Week4Assignment-ITMG371B001Summer2026-APEI.pdf

week4.docx

Examine issues surrounding digital media and enforcing copyright protections on the Internet.

Week 4 Practical Application Assignment

Topic: After conducting independent research respond to the following:

You have discovered that your copyright digital media has been infringed upon. You will manufacture an infringement in which a website of your choice has violated. Write a takedown notice to the violator.

Your notification must:

• Be in writing (this includes both hardcopy or digital);

• Be signed (whether in writing or via electronic signature) by the copyright owner or agent;

• Identify the original copyrighted work (or works if there are multiple) you claim has been infringed;

• Identify the material that is infringing your copyrighted work;

• Include contact information so the designated agent can reach you.

• Include a statement your complaint is in “good faith;”

• Include a statement the information in the notification is accurate; and

• Include a statement that under penalty of perjury you are authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.

Refer to https://sarafhawkins.com/how-to-file-dmca-takedown/ for an example.

Week4Assignment-ITMG371B001Summer2026-APEI.pdf

ITMG371 Week 4 Assignment Course: ITMG371 B001 Summer 2026

Criteria Exemplary 10 points

Accomplished 8.5 points

Developing 7.5 points

Beginning 6.5 points

Did Not Attempt 0 points

Criterion Score

Create a take

down notice,

that was signed

(whether in

writing or via

electronic sig-

nature) by the

or agent

/ 10

Identify the vio-

lating website

/ 10

Notice is signed

(whether in

writing or via

electronic sig-

nature) by the

or agent

/ 10

Identify the

original copy-

righted work (or

works if there

are multiple)

you claim has

been infringed

/ 10

Identify the ma-

terial that is in-

fringing your

copyrighted

work

/ 10

Include contact

information so

the designated

agent can reach

you.

/ 10

Include a state-

ment that indi-

cates your com-

plaint is in

“good faith."

/ 10

The student effec-

tively created a

take down notice

that was signed by

the owner or agent.

The student cre-

ated a take down

notice that was not

signed by the

owner or agent.

The student par-

tially created a take

down notice that

was signed by the

owner or agent.

The student par-

tially created a take

down notice that

was not signed by

the owner or agent

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively identified the

violating website.

The student mostly

identified the vio-

lating website.

The student some-

what identified the

violating website.

The student pro-

vided limited and

meaningless sub-

stance addressing

the criterion.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively provided a

signature on the

take down notice.

The student mostly

provided a signa-

ture on the take

down notice.

The student some-

what provided a

signature on the

take down notice.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively identified the

original copyrighted

work or works you

claimed was in-

fringed upon.

The student mostly

identified the origi-

nal copyrighted

work or works you

claimed was in-

fringed upon.

The student some-

what identified the

original copyrighted

work or works you

claimed was in-

fringed upon.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively identified the

material that is in-

fringing your copy-

righted work.

The student mostly

identified the mate-

rial that is infringing

your copyrighted

work.

The student some-

what identified the

material that is in-

fringing your copy-

righted work.

The student pro-

vided limited and

meaningless sub-

stance addressing

the criterion.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively included con-

tact information so

the designated

agent can reach

you.

The student mostly

included contact in-

formation so the

designated agent

can reach you.

The student some-

what included con-

tact information so

the designated

agent can reach

you.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively included a

statement that the

complaint is in

“good faith."

The student mostly

included a state-

ment that the com-

plaint is in “good

faith."

The student some-

what included a

statement that the

complaint is in

“good faith."

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

Total / 100

Overall Score

Criteria Exemplary 10 points

Accomplished 8.5 points

Developing 7.5 points

Beginning 6.5 points

Did Not Attempt 0 points

Criterion Score

Include a state-

ment the infor-

mation in the

notification is

accurate.

/ 10

Include a state-

ment that under

penalty of per-

jury you are au-

thorized to act

on behalf of the

owner of an ex-

clusive right

that is allegedly

infringed.

/ 10

The student effec-

tively included a

statement the in-

formation in the

notification is

accurate.

The student mostly

included a state-

ment the informa-

tion in the notifica-

tion is accurate.

The student some-

what included a

statement the in-

formation in the

notification is

accurate.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively included a

statement that un-

der penalty of per-

jury you are autho-

rized to act on be-

half of the owner of

an exclusive right

that is allegedly

infringed.

The student mostly

included a state-

ment that under

penalty of perjury

you are authorized

to act on behalf of

the owner of an ex-

clusive right that is

allegedly infringed.

The student some-

what included a

statement that un-

der penalty of per-

jury you are autho-

rized to act on be-

half of the owner of

an exclusive right

that is allegedly

infringed.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

Criteria Exemplary 10 points

Did Not Attempt 0 points

Criterion Score

Timeliness / 10Submitted on time. All late submissions have a 10-

point (10%) deduction.

Exemplary 90 points minimum

Accomplished 80 points minimum

Developing 70 points minimum

Beginning 60 points minimum

Did Not Attempt 0 points minimum

Week4Assignment-ITMG371B001Summer2026-APEI.pdf

ITMG371 Week 4 Assignment Course: ITMG371 B001 Summer 2026

Criteria Exemplary 10 points

Accomplished 8.5 points

Developing 7.5 points

Beginning 6.5 points

Did Not Attempt 0 points

Criterion Score

Create a take

down notice,

that was signed

(whether in

writing or via

electronic sig-

nature) by the

or agent

/ 10

Identify the vio-

lating website

/ 10

Notice is signed

(whether in

writing or via

electronic sig-

nature) by the

or agent

/ 10

Identify the

original copy-

righted work (or

works if there

are multiple)

you claim has

been infringed

/ 10

Identify the ma-

terial that is in-

fringing your

copyrighted

work

/ 10

Include contact

information so

the designated

agent can reach

you.

/ 10

Include a state-

ment that indi-

cates your com-

plaint is in

“good faith."

/ 10

The student effec-

tively created a

take down notice

that was signed by

the owner or agent.

The student cre-

ated a take down

notice that was not

signed by the

owner or agent.

The student par-

tially created a take

down notice that

was signed by the

owner or agent.

The student par-

tially created a take

down notice that

was not signed by

the owner or agent

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively identified the

violating website.

The student mostly

identified the vio-

lating website.

The student some-

what identified the

violating website.

The student pro-

vided limited and

meaningless sub-

stance addressing

the criterion.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively provided a

signature on the

take down notice.

The student mostly

provided a signa-

ture on the take

down notice.

The student some-

what provided a

signature on the

take down notice.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively identified the

original copyrighted

work or works you

claimed was in-

fringed upon.

The student mostly

identified the origi-

nal copyrighted

work or works you

claimed was in-

fringed upon.

The student some-

what identified the

original copyrighted

work or works you

claimed was in-

fringed upon.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively identified the

material that is in-

fringing your copy-

righted work.

The student mostly

identified the mate-

rial that is infringing

your copyrighted

work.

The student some-

what identified the

material that is in-

fringing your copy-

righted work.

The student pro-

vided limited and

meaningless sub-

stance addressing

the criterion.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively included con-

tact information so

the designated

agent can reach

you.

The student mostly

included contact in-

formation so the

designated agent

can reach you.

The student some-

what included con-

tact information so

the designated

agent can reach

you.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively included a

statement that the

complaint is in

“good faith."

The student mostly

included a state-

ment that the com-

plaint is in “good

faith."

The student some-

what included a

statement that the

complaint is in

“good faith."

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

Total / 100

Overall Score

Criteria Exemplary 10 points

Accomplished 8.5 points

Developing 7.5 points

Beginning 6.5 points

Did Not Attempt 0 points

Criterion Score

Include a state-

ment the infor-

mation in the

notification is

accurate.

/ 10

Include a state-

ment that under

penalty of per-

jury you are au-

thorized to act

on behalf of the

owner of an ex-

clusive right

that is allegedly

infringed.

/ 10

The student effec-

tively included a

statement the in-

formation in the

notification is

accurate.

The student mostly

included a state-

ment the informa-

tion in the notifica-

tion is accurate.

The student some-

what included a

statement the in-

formation in the

notification is

accurate.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively included a

statement that un-

der penalty of per-

jury you are autho-

rized to act on be-

half of the owner of

an exclusive right

that is allegedly

infringed.

The student mostly

included a state-

ment that under

penalty of perjury

you are authorized

to act on behalf of

the owner of an ex-

clusive right that is

allegedly infringed.

The student some-

what included a

statement that un-

der penalty of per-

jury you are autho-

rized to act on be-

half of the owner of

an exclusive right

that is allegedly

infringed.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

Criteria Exemplary 10 points

Did Not Attempt 0 points

Criterion Score

Timeliness / 10Submitted on time. All late submissions have a 10-

point (10%) deduction.

Exemplary 90 points minimum

Accomplished 80 points minimum

Developing 70 points minimum

Beginning 60 points minimum

Did Not Attempt 0 points minimum

Week4Assignment-ITMG371B001Summer2026-APEI.pdf

ITMG371 Week 4 Assignment Course: ITMG371 B001 Summer 2026

Criteria Exemplary 10 points

Accomplished 8.5 points

Developing 7.5 points

Beginning 6.5 points

Did Not Attempt 0 points

Criterion Score

Create a take

down notice,

that was signed

(whether in

writing or via

electronic sig-

nature) by the

or agent

/ 10

Identify the vio-

lating website

/ 10

Notice is signed

(whether in

writing or via

electronic sig-

nature) by the

or agent

/ 10

Identify the

original copy-

righted work (or

works if there

are multiple)

you claim has

been infringed

/ 10

Identify the ma-

terial that is in-

fringing your

copyrighted

work

/ 10

Include contact

information so

the designated

agent can reach

you.

/ 10

Include a state-

ment that indi-

cates your com-

plaint is in

“good faith."

/ 10

The student effec-

tively created a

take down notice

that was signed by

the owner or agent.

The student cre-

ated a take down

notice that was not

signed by the

owner or agent.

The student par-

tially created a take

down notice that

was signed by the

owner or agent.

The student par-

tially created a take

down notice that

was not signed by

the owner or agent

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively identified the

violating website.

The student mostly

identified the vio-

lating website.

The student some-

what identified the

violating website.

The student pro-

vided limited and

meaningless sub-

stance addressing

the criterion.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively provided a

signature on the

take down notice.

The student mostly

provided a signa-

ture on the take

down notice.

The student some-

what provided a

signature on the

take down notice.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively identified the

original copyrighted

work or works you

claimed was in-

fringed upon.

The student mostly

identified the origi-

nal copyrighted

work or works you

claimed was in-

fringed upon.

The student some-

what identified the

original copyrighted

work or works you

claimed was in-

fringed upon.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively identified the

material that is in-

fringing your copy-

righted work.

The student mostly

identified the mate-

rial that is infringing

your copyrighted

work.

The student some-

what identified the

material that is in-

fringing your copy-

righted work.

The student pro-

vided limited and

meaningless sub-

stance addressing

the criterion.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively included con-

tact information so

the designated

agent can reach

you.

The student mostly

included contact in-

formation so the

designated agent

can reach you.

The student some-

what included con-

tact information so

the designated

agent can reach

you.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively included a

statement that the

complaint is in

“good faith."

The student mostly

included a state-

ment that the com-

plaint is in “good

faith."

The student some-

what included a

statement that the

complaint is in

“good faith."

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

Total / 100

Overall Score

Criteria Exemplary 10 points

Accomplished 8.5 points

Developing 7.5 points

Beginning 6.5 points

Did Not Attempt 0 points

Criterion Score

Include a state-

ment the infor-

mation in the

notification is

accurate.

/ 10

Include a state-

ment that under

penalty of per-

jury you are au-

thorized to act

on behalf of the

owner of an ex-

clusive right

that is allegedly

infringed.

/ 10

The student effec-

tively included a

statement the in-

formation in the

notification is

accurate.

The student mostly

included a state-

ment the informa-

tion in the notifica-

tion is accurate.

The student some-

what included a

statement the in-

formation in the

notification is

accurate.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively included a

statement that un-

der penalty of per-

jury you are autho-

rized to act on be-

half of the owner of

an exclusive right

that is allegedly

infringed.

The student mostly

included a state-

ment that under

penalty of perjury

you are authorized

to act on behalf of

the owner of an ex-

clusive right that is

allegedly infringed.

The student some-

what included a

statement that un-

der penalty of per-

jury you are autho-

rized to act on be-

half of the owner of

an exclusive right

that is allegedly

infringed.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

Criteria Exemplary 10 points

Did Not Attempt 0 points

Criterion Score

Timeliness / 10Submitted on time. All late submissions have a 10-

point (10%) deduction.

Exemplary 90 points minimum

Accomplished 80 points minimum

Developing 70 points minimum

Beginning 60 points minimum

Did Not Attempt 0 points minimum

week4.docx

Examine issues surrounding digital media and enforcing copyright protections on the Internet.

Week 4 Practical Application Assignment

Topic: After conducting independent research respond to the following:

Your notification must:

• Be in writing (this includes both hardcopy or digital);

• Be signed (whether in writing or via electronic signature) by the copyright owner or agent;

• Identify the original copyrighted work (or works if there are multiple) you claim has been infringed;

• Identify the material that is infringing your copyrighted work;

• Include contact information so the designated agent can reach you.

• Include a statement your complaint is in “good faith;”

• Include a statement the information in the notification is accurate; and

• Include a statement that under penalty of perjury you are authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.

Refer to https://sarafhawkins.com/how-to-file-dmca-takedown/ for an example.

Week4Assignment-ITMG371B001Summer2026-APEI.pdf

ITMG371 Week 4 Assignment Course: ITMG371 B001 Summer 2026

Criteria Exemplary 10 points

Accomplished 8.5 points

Developing 7.5 points

Beginning 6.5 points

Did Not Attempt 0 points

Criterion Score

Create a take

down notice,

that was signed

(whether in

writing or via

electronic sig-

nature) by the

or agent

/ 10

Identify the vio-

lating website

/ 10

Notice is signed

(whether in

writing or via

electronic sig-

nature) by the

or agent

/ 10

Identify the

original copy-

righted work (or

works if there

are multiple)

you claim has

been infringed

/ 10

Identify the ma-

terial that is in-

fringing your

copyrighted

work

/ 10

Include contact

information so

the designated

agent can reach

you.

/ 10

Include a state-

ment that indi-

cates your com-

plaint is in

“good faith."

/ 10

The student effec-

tively created a

take down notice

that was signed by

the owner or agent.

The student cre-

ated a take down

notice that was not

signed by the

owner or agent.

The student par-

tially created a take

down notice that

was signed by the

owner or agent.

The student par-

tially created a take

down notice that

was not signed by

the owner or agent

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively identified the

violating website.

The student mostly

identified the vio-

lating website.

The student some-

what identified the

violating website.

The student pro-

vided limited and

meaningless sub-

stance addressing

the criterion.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively provided a

signature on the

take down notice.

The student mostly

provided a signa-

ture on the take

down notice.

The student some-

what provided a

signature on the

take down notice.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively identified the

original copyrighted

work or works you

claimed was in-

fringed upon.

The student mostly

identified the origi-

nal copyrighted

work or works you

claimed was in-

fringed upon.

The student some-

what identified the

original copyrighted

work or works you

claimed was in-

fringed upon.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively identified the

material that is in-

fringing your copy-

righted work.

The student mostly

identified the mate-

rial that is infringing

your copyrighted

work.

The student some-

what identified the

material that is in-

fringing your copy-

righted work.

The student pro-

vided limited and

meaningless sub-

stance addressing

the criterion.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively included con-

tact information so

the designated

agent can reach

you.

The student mostly

included contact in-

formation so the

designated agent

can reach you.

The student some-

what included con-

tact information so

the designated

agent can reach

you.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively included a

statement that the

complaint is in

“good faith."

The student mostly

included a state-

ment that the com-

plaint is in “good

faith."

The student some-

what included a

statement that the

complaint is in

“good faith."

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

Total / 100

Overall Score

Criteria Exemplary 10 points

Accomplished 8.5 points

Developing 7.5 points

Beginning 6.5 points

Did Not Attempt 0 points

Criterion Score

Include a state-

ment the infor-

mation in the

notification is

accurate.

/ 10

Include a state-

ment that under

penalty of per-

jury you are au-

thorized to act

on behalf of the

owner of an ex-

clusive right

that is allegedly

infringed.

/ 10

The student effec-

tively included a

statement the in-

formation in the

notification is

accurate.

The student mostly

included a state-

ment the informa-

tion in the notifica-

tion is accurate.

The student some-

what included a

statement the in-

formation in the

notification is

accurate.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively included a

statement that un-

der penalty of per-

jury you are autho-

rized to act on be-

half of the owner of

an exclusive right

that is allegedly

infringed.

The student mostly

included a state-

ment that under

penalty of perjury

you are authorized

to act on behalf of

the owner of an ex-

clusive right that is

allegedly infringed.

The student some-

what included a

statement that un-

der penalty of per-

jury you are autho-

rized to act on be-

half of the owner of

an exclusive right

that is allegedly

infringed.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

Criteria Exemplary 10 points

Did Not Attempt 0 points

Criterion Score

Timeliness / 10Submitted on time. All late submissions have a 10-

point (10%) deduction.

Exemplary 90 points minimum

Accomplished 80 points minimum

Developing 70 points minimum

Beginning 60 points minimum

Did Not Attempt 0 points minimum

Week4Assignment-ITMG371B001Summer2026-APEI.pdf

ITMG371 Week 4 Assignment Course: ITMG371 B001 Summer 2026

Criteria Exemplary 10 points

Accomplished 8.5 points

Developing 7.5 points

Beginning 6.5 points

Did Not Attempt 0 points

Criterion Score

Create a take

down notice,

that was signed

(whether in

writing or via

electronic sig-

nature) by the

or agent

/ 10

Identify the vio-

lating website

/ 10

Notice is signed

(whether in

writing or via

electronic sig-

nature) by the

or agent

/ 10

Identify the

original copy-

righted work (or

works if there

are multiple)

you claim has

been infringed

/ 10

Identify the ma-

terial that is in-

fringing your

copyrighted

work

/ 10

Include contact

information so

the designated

agent can reach

you.

/ 10

Include a state-

ment that indi-

cates your com-

plaint is in

“good faith."

/ 10

The student effec-

tively created a

take down notice

that was signed by

the owner or agent.

The student cre-

ated a take down

notice that was not

signed by the

owner or agent.

The student par-

tially created a take

down notice that

was signed by the

owner or agent.

The student par-

tially created a take

down notice that

was not signed by

the owner or agent

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively identified the

violating website.

The student mostly

identified the vio-

lating website.

The student some-

what identified the

violating website.

The student pro-

vided limited and

meaningless sub-

stance addressing

the criterion.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively provided a

signature on the

take down notice.

The student mostly

provided a signa-

ture on the take

down notice.

The student some-

what provided a

signature on the

take down notice.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively identified the

original copyrighted

work or works you

claimed was in-

fringed upon.

The student mostly

identified the origi-

nal copyrighted

work or works you

claimed was in-

fringed upon.

The student some-

what identified the

original copyrighted

work or works you

claimed was in-

fringed upon.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively identified the

material that is in-

fringing your copy-

righted work.

The student mostly

identified the mate-

rial that is infringing

your copyrighted

work.

The student some-

what identified the

material that is in-

fringing your copy-

righted work.

The student pro-

vided limited and

meaningless sub-

stance addressing

the criterion.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively included con-

tact information so

the designated

agent can reach

you.

The student mostly

included contact in-

formation so the

designated agent

can reach you.

The student some-

what included con-

tact information so

the designated

agent can reach

you.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively included a

statement that the

complaint is in

“good faith."

The student mostly

included a state-

ment that the com-

plaint is in “good

faith."

The student some-

what included a

statement that the

complaint is in

“good faith."

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

Total / 100

Overall Score

Criteria Exemplary 10 points

Accomplished 8.5 points

Developing 7.5 points

Beginning 6.5 points

Did Not Attempt 0 points

Criterion Score

Include a state-

ment the infor-

mation in the

notification is

accurate.

/ 10

Include a state-

ment that under

penalty of per-

jury you are au-

thorized to act

on behalf of the

owner of an ex-

clusive right

that is allegedly

infringed.

/ 10

The student effec-

tively included a

statement the in-

formation in the

notification is

accurate.

The student mostly

included a state-

ment the informa-

tion in the notifica-

tion is accurate.

The student some-

what included a

statement the in-

formation in the

notification is

accurate.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively included a

statement that un-

der penalty of per-

jury you are autho-

rized to act on be-

half of the owner of

an exclusive right

that is allegedly

infringed.

The student mostly

included a state-

ment that under

penalty of perjury

you are authorized

to act on behalf of

the owner of an ex-

clusive right that is

allegedly infringed.

The student some-

what included a

statement that un-

der penalty of per-

jury you are autho-

rized to act on be-

half of the owner of

an exclusive right

that is allegedly

infringed.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

Criteria Exemplary 10 points

Did Not Attempt 0 points

Criterion Score

Timeliness / 10Submitted on time. All late submissions have a 10-

point (10%) deduction.

Exemplary 90 points minimum

Accomplished 80 points minimum

Developing 70 points minimum

Beginning 60 points minimum

Did Not Attempt 0 points minimum

week4.docx

Examine issues surrounding digital media and enforcing copyright protections on the Internet.

Week 4 Practical Application Assignment

Topic: After conducting independent research respond to the following:

Your notification must:

• Be in writing (this includes both hardcopy or digital);

• Be signed (whether in writing or via electronic signature) by the copyright owner or agent;

• Identify the original copyrighted work (or works if there are multiple) you claim has been infringed;

• Identify the material that is infringing your copyrighted work;

• Include contact information so the designated agent can reach you.

• Include a statement your complaint is in “good faith;”

• Include a statement the information in the notification is accurate; and

• Include a statement that under penalty of perjury you are authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.

Refer to https://sarafhawkins.com/how-to-file-dmca-takedown/ for an example.

Week4Assignment-ITMG371B001Summer2026-APEI.pdf

ITMG371 Week 4 Assignment Course: ITMG371 B001 Summer 2026

Criteria Exemplary 10 points

Accomplished 8.5 points

Developing 7.5 points

Beginning 6.5 points

Did Not Attempt 0 points

Criterion Score

Create a take

down notice,

that was signed

(whether in

writing or via

electronic sig-

nature) by the

or agent

/ 10

Identify the vio-

lating website

/ 10

Notice is signed

(whether in

writing or via

electronic sig-

nature) by the

or agent

/ 10

Identify the

original copy-

righted work (or

works if there

are multiple)

you claim has

been infringed

/ 10

Identify the ma-

terial that is in-

fringing your

copyrighted

work

/ 10

Include contact

information so

the designated

agent can reach

you.

/ 10

Include a state-

ment that indi-

cates your com-

plaint is in

“good faith."

/ 10

The student effec-

tively created a

take down notice

that was signed by

the owner or agent.

The student cre-

ated a take down

notice that was not

signed by the

owner or agent.

The student par-

tially created a take

down notice that

was signed by the

owner or agent.

The student par-

tially created a take

down notice that

was not signed by

the owner or agent

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively identified the

violating website.

The student mostly

identified the vio-

lating website.

The student some-

what identified the

violating website.

The student pro-

vided limited and

meaningless sub-

stance addressing

the criterion.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively provided a

signature on the

take down notice.

The student mostly

provided a signa-

ture on the take

down notice.

The student some-

what provided a

signature on the

take down notice.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively identified the

original copyrighted

work or works you

claimed was in-

fringed upon.

The student mostly

identified the origi-

nal copyrighted

work or works you

claimed was in-

fringed upon.

The student some-

what identified the

original copyrighted

work or works you

claimed was in-

fringed upon.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively identified the

material that is in-

fringing your copy-

righted work.

The student mostly

identified the mate-

rial that is infringing

your copyrighted

work.

The student some-

what identified the

material that is in-

fringing your copy-

righted work.

The student pro-

vided limited and

meaningless sub-

stance addressing

the criterion.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively included con-

tact information so

the designated

agent can reach

you.

The student mostly

included contact in-

formation so the

designated agent

can reach you.

The student some-

what included con-

tact information so

the designated

agent can reach

you.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively included a

statement that the

complaint is in

“good faith."

The student mostly

included a state-

ment that the com-

plaint is in “good

faith."

The student some-

what included a

statement that the

complaint is in

“good faith."

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

Total / 100

Overall Score

Criteria Exemplary 10 points

Accomplished 8.5 points

Developing 7.5 points

Beginning 6.5 points

Did Not Attempt 0 points

Criterion Score

Include a state-

ment the infor-

mation in the

notification is

accurate.

/ 10

Include a state-

ment that under

penalty of per-

jury you are au-

thorized to act

on behalf of the

owner of an ex-

clusive right

that is allegedly

infringed.

/ 10

The student effec-

tively included a

statement the in-

formation in the

notification is

accurate.

The student mostly

included a state-

ment the informa-

tion in the notifica-

tion is accurate.

The student some-

what included a

statement the in-

formation in the

notification is

accurate.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively included a

statement that un-

der penalty of per-

jury you are autho-

rized to act on be-

half of the owner of

an exclusive right

that is allegedly

infringed.

The student mostly

included a state-

ment that under

penalty of perjury

you are authorized

to act on behalf of

the owner of an ex-

clusive right that is

allegedly infringed.

The student some-

what included a

statement that un-

der penalty of per-

jury you are autho-

rized to act on be-

half of the owner of

an exclusive right

that is allegedly

infringed.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

Criteria Exemplary 10 points

Did Not Attempt 0 points

Criterion Score

Timeliness / 10Submitted on time. All late submissions have a 10-

point (10%) deduction.

Exemplary 90 points minimum

Accomplished 80 points minimum

Developing 70 points minimum

Beginning 60 points minimum

Did Not Attempt 0 points minimum

Week4Assignment-ITMG371B001Summer2026-APEI.pdf

ITMG371 Week 4 Assignment Course: ITMG371 B001 Summer 2026

Criteria Exemplary 10 points

Accomplished 8.5 points

Developing 7.5 points

Beginning 6.5 points

Did Not Attempt 0 points

Criterion Score

Create a take

down notice,

that was signed

(whether in

writing or via

electronic sig-

nature) by the

or agent

/ 10

Identify the vio-

lating website

/ 10

Notice is signed

(whether in

writing or via

electronic sig-

nature) by the

or agent

/ 10

Identify the

original copy-

righted work (or

works if there

are multiple)

you claim has

been infringed

/ 10

Identify the ma-

terial that is in-

fringing your

copyrighted

work

/ 10

Include contact

information so

the designated

agent can reach

you.

/ 10

Include a state-

ment that indi-

cates your com-

plaint is in

“good faith."

/ 10

The student effec-

tively created a

take down notice

that was signed by

the owner or agent.

The student cre-

ated a take down

notice that was not

signed by the

owner or agent.

The student par-

tially created a take

down notice that

was signed by the

owner or agent.

The student par-

tially created a take

down notice that

was not signed by

the owner or agent

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively identified the

violating website.

The student mostly

identified the vio-

lating website.

The student some-

what identified the

violating website.

The student pro-

vided limited and

meaningless sub-

stance addressing

the criterion.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively provided a

signature on the

take down notice.

The student mostly

provided a signa-

ture on the take

down notice.

The student some-

what provided a

signature on the

take down notice.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively identified the

original copyrighted

work or works you

claimed was in-

fringed upon.

The student mostly

identified the origi-

nal copyrighted

work or works you

claimed was in-

fringed upon.

The student some-

what identified the

original copyrighted

work or works you

claimed was in-

fringed upon.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively identified the

material that is in-

fringing your copy-

righted work.

The student mostly

identified the mate-

rial that is infringing

your copyrighted

work.

The student some-

what identified the

material that is in-

fringing your copy-

righted work.

The student pro-

vided limited and

meaningless sub-

stance addressing

the criterion.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively included con-

tact information so

the designated

agent can reach

you.

The student mostly

included contact in-

formation so the

designated agent

can reach you.

The student some-

what included con-

tact information so

the designated

agent can reach

you.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively included a

statement that the

complaint is in

“good faith."

The student mostly

included a state-

ment that the com-

plaint is in “good

faith."

The student some-

what included a

statement that the

complaint is in

“good faith."

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

Total / 100

Overall Score

Criteria Exemplary 10 points

Accomplished 8.5 points

Developing 7.5 points

Beginning 6.5 points

Did Not Attempt 0 points

Criterion Score

Include a state-

ment the infor-

mation in the

notification is

accurate.

/ 10

Include a state-

ment that under

penalty of per-

jury you are au-

thorized to act

on behalf of the

owner of an ex-

clusive right

that is allegedly

infringed.

/ 10

The student effec-

tively included a

statement the in-

formation in the

notification is

accurate.

The student mostly

included a state-

ment the informa-

tion in the notifica-

tion is accurate.

The student some-

what included a

statement the in-

formation in the

notification is

accurate.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

The student effec-

tively included a

statement that un-

der penalty of per-

jury you are autho-

rized to act on be-

half of the owner of

an exclusive right

that is allegedly

infringed.

The student mostly

included a state-

ment that under

penalty of perjury

you are authorized

to act on behalf of

the owner of an ex-

clusive right that is

allegedly infringed.

The student some-

what included a

statement that un-

der penalty of per-

jury you are autho-

rized to act on be-

half of the owner of

an exclusive right

that is allegedly

infringed.

Information has lit-

tle or nothing to do

with the main topic.

Student failed to

address the

criterion.

Criteria Exemplary 10 points

Did Not Attempt 0 points

Criterion Score

Timeliness / 10Submitted on time. All late submissions have a 10-

point (10%) deduction.

Exemplary 90 points minimum

Accomplished 80 points minimum

Developing 70 points minimum

Beginning 60 points minimum

Did Not Attempt 0 points minimum

other Questions(10)