week
2 years ago
125
reviewer-form.pdf
graduate-review-form.pdf
- TheDigitalDilemmaaa.docx
- TheDigitalDilemma1.pdf
- TheDigitalDilemma1.pdf
- ChristianLeadershipDoctoralPrograms-ResearchHandbook-CURRENTVERSION.pdf
reviewer-form.pdf
Fidei et Veritatis Reviewers Form
Part 1. Likert Scale Review
Excellent (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Poor (1) N/A
Subject The topic is appropriate for the journal. The topic is relevant to the scholarly milieu of the
day.
The topic is novel and unique. Needs a minimum of 10 points
Content
The author exhibits an in-depth understanding of the
topic.
The author exhibits a broad understanding of the
topic.
The author demonstrates that the topic is well
researched, cited and footnoted (according to its
respective format – APA, Turabian, AMA, MLA)
The article contributes something new to its
respective field of interest.
Needs a minimum of 13 points
Research There is adequate evidence supporting the premises.
Multiple, reliable sources were used to support
premises.
It is evident that the author is aware and understands
the literature on this topic.
Needs a minimum of 9 points
Reflections on the Research (Optional) – Depends on whether or not student wanted to include personal reflections The author explains how the conflict that arises from
this issue poses significant problems for Christianity.
The author reflects on how the topic or research has
challenged his/her faith.
The author explains how his/her research contributes
to Christian faith and thought.
The author describes the relevance of this research to
the Christianity today.
Needs a minimum of 14 points
Part 2. Narrative Review Please provide a narrative in regard to each of these topics to support your ratings above.
I. Content
II. Subject
III. Research
IV. Reflections on the Research
Part 3. Reviewer Recommendation (You will indicate your recommendation here and online via the “Submit Review” Link.)
Please indicate one of the recommendations below when submitting your report.
a. Accept with no revisions
b. Accept with minor revisions
c. Accept with major revisions
d. Not accepted
graduate-review-form.pdf
Fidei et Veritatis Graduate Writing Review Form
Part 1. Likert Scale Review
Excellent (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Poor (1) N/A
Format
The author has a minimum of 12 pages, not
including the title page, abstract, endnotes, and/or
references/bibliography.
Times New Roman style is used, and is in size 12
font.
Proper headings are used.
Single-spaced within each paragraph, and double-
spaced between headings. Please review template for
formatting requirements.
The author uses correct in-text citations or footnotes
depending on its respective style (APA, Turabian,
AMA, MLA).
The reference page, works cited page or bibliography
is accurate and has used the correct citation for its
respective style (APA, Turabian, AMA, MLA).
Needs a minimum of 20 points
Writing
The writing is clear and conveys the message of the
topic.
The author’s writing uses clear transitions between
paragraphs and sections, it flows, and is easy to read.
The author uses correct grammar, spelling,
punctuation, and verb tense.
The author reflects graduate level writing, grammar
and syntax.
The author’s writing is appropriate and professional,
and uses language of his/her respective field (no
unnecessary jargon, etc.).
Needs a minimum of 17 points
Argumentation
The significance of this research to the field is
explained.
The article interacts with scholarly and authoritative
sources to the issue presented.
The thesis, premises, and conclusions are clearly
stated.
The conclusions follow from the premises.
The argument is logically cohesive.
Needs a minimum of 16 points
Part 2. Narrative Review Please provide a narrative in regard to each of these topics to support your ratings above.
I. Format
II. Writing
III. Argumentation
Part 3. Reviewer Recommendation (You will indicate your recommendation here and online via the “Submit Review” Link.)
Please indicate one of the recommendations below when submitting your report.
a. Accept with no revisions
b. Accept with suggested revisions
c. Not accepted
- For Prof. Shaukat only
- Type 2 Diabetes*****Already A++ Rated Tutorial Use as Guide Paper*****
- Human Resource Legal Issues*****Already A++ Rated Tutorial Use as Guide Paper*****
- Week 9 Discussion 1
- Assignment
- Marketing Principles
- Week 5: Student Response to Discussion 1 and 2
- Soc 112 class
- Food Safety Due Feb 20, 11:59 PMNot SubmittedPOINTS 7 Paperno new messages Objectives: 5.2 InstructionsAssignment FilesGrading Review food safety scenarios and answer questions in relation to Food Safety. Consult the [Food Safety...
- Case Study #4: How can we improve global cooperation to respond to cybersecurity challenges in cyberspace?