Week 2 interview a1

Week2_Assignment1.pdfinterview.pdf

Due Dec 10 by 10:59pm Points 50 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2

Start Assignment

Back to Week at a Glance (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157567)

There is an old adage that “practice makes perfect,” which is particularly relevant to learning a new set of skills like those associated with motivational interviewing. Over the next several weeks, the Assignments are designed to give you opportunities to practice specific motivational interviewing skills that are introduced in the Discussions.

In this week’s Discussion, you practiced applying the spirit of motivational interviewing to a service user in the case study to which you were assigned. As you may remember, the spirit of motivational interviewing is a heart-set and mindset that encompasses four elements that are crucial for building a relationship with a service user: partnership, acceptance, compassion, and evocation (Miller & Rollnick, 2013). In this Assignment, you will review a series of practitioner statements to determine whether the statements reflect the spirit of motivational interviewing.

Reference: Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change(3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.

THE SPIRIT OF MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591)

https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157567

https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591

HUMN_6161_Week2_Assignment_Rubric

Review the Learning Resources on the spirit of motivational interviewing. Review the document entitled, “Rating Samples for MI Spirit.” Consider whether each of the exchanges is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Why, or why not?

Submit a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:

Explain whether each exchange in the “Rating Samples for MI Spirit” document is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Why, or why not? Be specific. In instances where you do not believe that the exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing, explain how the practitioner could have responded to be consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Again, be specific.

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK2Assgn1_LastName_Firstinitial.

2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page. 3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

TO PREPARE

BY DAY 7

SUBMISSION AND GRADING INFORMATION

https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591

Criteria Ratings Pts

20 pts

22.5 pts

7.5 pts

Explain whether each exchange in the “Rating Samples for MI Spirit” document is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Why, or why not? Be specific.

20 to >17.8 pts Exceeds Expectations Explanation of whether each exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing is accurate and complete. Specific and convincing justifications are provided.

17.8 to >15.8 pts Meets Expectations Explanation of whether each exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing is mostly accurate and complete. Relevant justifications are provided.

15.8 to >13.8 pts Fair

Explanation of whether each exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing is somewhat inaccurate and/or incomplete. Vague justifications are provided.

13.8 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Explanation of whether each exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing is inaccurate, incomplete, or missing altogether. No justifications are provided.

In instances where you do not believe that the exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing, explain how the practitioner could have responded to be consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Again, be specific.

22.5 to >20.02 pts Exceeds Expectations Explanation of how the practitioner could have responded is specific, appropriate, and consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing.

20.02 to >17.78 pts Meets Expectations Explanation of how the practitioner could have responded is mostly specific, appropriate, and consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing, although there may be minor errors, inaccuracies, or missing details.

17.78 to >15.52 pts Fair Explanation of how the practitioner could have responded is vague, somewhat inaccurate, or somewhat inconsistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. There may be errors, inaccuracies, or missing details.

15.52 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Explanation of how the practitioner could have responded is missing, inaccurate, or inconsistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. There may be major errors, inaccuracies, and missing details.

Scholarly Writing and APA Style

7.5 to >6.68 pts Exceeds Expectations

6.68 to >5.93 pts Meets Expectations

5.93 to >5.18 pts Fair

5.18 to >0 pts Needs Improvement

Total Points: 50

Criteria Ratings Pts

The paper is clear and coherent. Student writes with proper grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation to convey their scholarly message. Fewer than 5 errors occur in the paper. The paper displays proper scholarly voice, organization, and focus. Student paraphrases evidence from scholarly sources correctly and integrates and analyzes it effectively. Includes citations and a reference list that are mostly formatted correctly in APA Style. Headings and paper formatting reflect proper APA.

The paper is mostly clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor, minimal (5-8), and do not interfere with the scholarly message. The paper displays effective scholarly voice, organization, and focus. Student paraphrases evidence from scholarly sources correctly, but integration and analysis could be improved. Includes citations and a reference list, but they contain minor APA errors. Headings and paper formatting contain minor APA errors.

The paper is somewhat clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor but frequent (9-12) and occasionally interfere with the message. The paper has lapses in scholarly voice. The paper lacks clear organization or occasionally strays from the focus. Student occasionally paraphrases source information incorrectly. Includes citations and a reference list, but they contain major APA errors. Headings and paper formatting contain major APA errors.

The paper lacks clarity and coherence. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are major, pervasive (13+), and interfere with the message. The paper shows little or no attention to scholarly voice, organization, and focus. Student consistently paraphrases source information incorrectly (resulting in accidental plagiarism) and/or relies exclusively on direct quotes. Citations are infrequent or missing. Little or no attempt has been made to provide a reference list or to format

HUMN_6161_Week02_RatingSamplesForMISpirit.pdf

22

From Building Motivational Interviewing Skills: A Practitioner Workbook by David B. Rosengren. Copyright 2009 by The Guilford Press. Permission to photocopy this exercise is granted to purchasers of this book for personal use only (see copyright page for details).

(cont.)

ExErcisE 2.2 Rating Samples for MI Spirit

Here are examples of short client statements and prac ti tion er responses. Review these exchanges and then decide if the prac ti tion er’s response is consistent with the spirit of MI (thumbs up) or not (thumbs down). You might want to jot down a few notes as to why you rated each sample as you did. Then look at the discussion for each example at the end of this exercise.

1. Sarah’s husband (Richard) : I’m just furious that she lied to me and had this affair behind my back. I can’t believe I didn’t see it. I feel like such an idiot.

Prac ti tion er: In retrospect, what signs did you overlook?

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Why?

2. Arthur: I know my dad told you I’m depressed, but I’m not. Just because I don’t want to play football doesn’t mean I’m depressed.

Prac ti tion er: Your father is worrying needlessly. What do you think he’s seeing that makes him worry this way?

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Why?

3. Tanya : I need to come up with some sort of plan to help me get back on track now. This health crisis has thrown me for a loop. I can’t think about anything else. What do you think I should do?

Prac ti tion er: Well, I have some ideas about what might help, but first let me hear what you’ve already consid- ered.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Why?

4. Arthur: I’m not going to keep that stupid thought journal. How does it help me to monitor my “loser” thinking? I’m coming here to feel better, and paying attention to all that makes me feel worse.

Prac ti tion er: OK, Arthur, you might be right. This works for many folks, but not everyone. Maybe we need to try a different way to approach this. We’ve talked about other ways to approach this issue. What makes sense to you to practice instead?

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Why?

5. Tanya : They told me I have to have this surgery right away. But I don’t trust them, so I haven’t scheduled it yet.

23

Rating Samples for MI Spirit (p. 2 of 2)

Prac ti tion er: Why take the chance? They’re the experts, after all. Let’s call from this phone right now—maybe you can get in this week.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Why?

6. Sarah: I’ve had it with Richard’s guilt mongering. Okay, so I had an affair. I’m ready to end it and start working on our marriage, but I don’t think he’s ever going to let me forget it. Maybe we should just get a divorce.

Prac ti tion er: Sarah, you are the only one who can decide if you should stay in this marriage or leave it. I wonder what signs you would need to feel more optimistic about working on things with Richard.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Why?

7. Arthur’s mother (Peggy) : They had a little “surprise party” for me. Everyone showed up when I wasn’t looking and then spent the next 2 hours telling me how my drinking hurt them. They think I’m an alcoholic! I might have a drinking problem, but I’m damn sure not an alcoholic.

Prac ti tion er: (gently) Peggy, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it’s probably a duck. I think if all those people are telling you you’re an alcoholic, they’re probably right. You might be in denial, don’t you think?

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Why?

8. Arthur’s father (Lloyd) : I think Arthur is taking over too many of the household responsibilities. A boy his age ought to be playing sports and chasing girls. Instead, he’s worrying about his younger brother and how the house looks. He even does laundry. I can tell you I never did that at his age. But when I try to push him toward more normal things, like football, he just gets mad at me and says I don’t understand him. What am I supposed to do?

Prac ti tion er: In families where alcohol has been a problem, it often works like this. What if you tried the chess club or the school newspaper instead of pushing him toward football? I think he’d be more receptive to that. I don’t think you recognize how smart Arthur is. It could be that he will never be all that interested in football.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Why?

9. Tanya : My doctor gave me a long list of all the things I have to do to manage my care. It’s overwhelming. I have to take medication three times a day. I can’t even remember to feed my dog every single day. I just can’t do it. But I’m afraid I’ll die if I don’t.

Prac ti tion er: (encouraging) You can do this. You have to.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Why?

Week2_Assignment1.pdfinterview.pdf

Due Dec 10 by 10:59pm Points 50 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2

Start Assignment

Back to Week at a Glance (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157567)

There is an old adage that “practice makes perfect,” which is particularly relevant to learning a new set of skills like those associated with motivational interviewing. Over the next several weeks, the Assignments are designed to give you opportunities to practice specific motivational interviewing skills that are introduced in the Discussions.

In this week’s Discussion, you practiced applying the spirit of motivational interviewing to a service user in the case study to which you were assigned. As you may remember, the spirit of motivational interviewing is a heart-set and mindset that encompasses four elements that are crucial for building a relationship with a service user: partnership, acceptance, compassion, and evocation (Miller & Rollnick, 2013). In this Assignment, you will review a series of practitioner statements to determine whether the statements reflect the spirit of motivational interviewing.

Reference: Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change(3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.

THE SPIRIT OF MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591)

https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157567

https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591

HUMN_6161_Week2_Assignment_Rubric

Review the Learning Resources on the spirit of motivational interviewing. Review the document entitled, “Rating Samples for MI Spirit.” Consider whether each of the exchanges is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Why, or why not?

Submit a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:

Explain whether each exchange in the “Rating Samples for MI Spirit” document is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Why, or why not? Be specific. In instances where you do not believe that the exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing, explain how the practitioner could have responded to be consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Again, be specific.

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK2Assgn1_LastName_Firstinitial.

2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page. 3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

TO PREPARE

BY DAY 7

SUBMISSION AND GRADING INFORMATION

https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591

Criteria Ratings Pts

20 pts

22.5 pts

7.5 pts

Explain whether each exchange in the “Rating Samples for MI Spirit” document is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Why, or why not? Be specific.

20 to >17.8 pts Exceeds Expectations Explanation of whether each exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing is accurate and complete. Specific and convincing justifications are provided.

17.8 to >15.8 pts Meets Expectations Explanation of whether each exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing is mostly accurate and complete. Relevant justifications are provided.

15.8 to >13.8 pts Fair

Explanation of whether each exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing is somewhat inaccurate and/or incomplete. Vague justifications are provided.

13.8 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Explanation of whether each exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing is inaccurate, incomplete, or missing altogether. No justifications are provided.

In instances where you do not believe that the exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing, explain how the practitioner could have responded to be consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Again, be specific.

22.5 to >20.02 pts Exceeds Expectations Explanation of how the practitioner could have responded is specific, appropriate, and consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing.

20.02 to >17.78 pts Meets Expectations Explanation of how the practitioner could have responded is mostly specific, appropriate, and consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing, although there may be minor errors, inaccuracies, or missing details.

17.78 to >15.52 pts Fair Explanation of how the practitioner could have responded is vague, somewhat inaccurate, or somewhat inconsistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. There may be errors, inaccuracies, or missing details.

15.52 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Explanation of how the practitioner could have responded is missing, inaccurate, or inconsistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. There may be major errors, inaccuracies, and missing details.

Scholarly Writing and APA Style

7.5 to >6.68 pts Exceeds Expectations

6.68 to >5.93 pts Meets Expectations

5.93 to >5.18 pts Fair

5.18 to >0 pts Needs Improvement

Total Points: 50

Criteria Ratings Pts

The paper is clear and coherent. Student writes with proper grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation to convey their scholarly message. Fewer than 5 errors occur in the paper. The paper displays proper scholarly voice, organization, and focus. Student paraphrases evidence from scholarly sources correctly and integrates and analyzes it effectively. Includes citations and a reference list that are mostly formatted correctly in APA Style. Headings and paper formatting reflect proper APA.

The paper is mostly clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor, minimal (5-8), and do not interfere with the scholarly message. The paper displays effective scholarly voice, organization, and focus. Student paraphrases evidence from scholarly sources correctly, but integration and analysis could be improved. Includes citations and a reference list, but they contain minor APA errors. Headings and paper formatting contain minor APA errors.

The paper is somewhat clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor but frequent (9-12) and occasionally interfere with the message. The paper has lapses in scholarly voice. The paper lacks clear organization or occasionally strays from the focus. Student occasionally paraphrases source information incorrectly. Includes citations and a reference list, but they contain major APA errors. Headings and paper formatting contain major APA errors.

The paper lacks clarity and coherence. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are major, pervasive (13+), and interfere with the message. The paper shows little or no attention to scholarly voice, organization, and focus. Student consistently paraphrases source information incorrectly (resulting in accidental plagiarism) and/or relies exclusively on direct quotes. Citations are infrequent or missing. Little or no attempt has been made to provide a reference list or to format

HUMN_6161_Week02_RatingSamplesForMISpirit.pdf

22

From Building Motivational Interviewing Skills: A Practitioner Workbook by David B. Rosengren. Copyright 2009 by The Guilford Press. Permission to photocopy this exercise is granted to purchasers of this book for personal use only (see copyright page for details).

(cont.)

ExErcisE 2.2 Rating Samples for MI Spirit

Here are examples of short client statements and prac ti tion er responses. Review these exchanges and then decide if the prac ti tion er’s response is consistent with the spirit of MI (thumbs up) or not (thumbs down). You might want to jot down a few notes as to why you rated each sample as you did. Then look at the discussion for each example at the end of this exercise.

1. Sarah’s husband (Richard) : I’m just furious that she lied to me and had this affair behind my back. I can’t believe I didn’t see it. I feel like such an idiot.

Prac ti tion er: In retrospect, what signs did you overlook?

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Why?

2. Arthur: I know my dad told you I’m depressed, but I’m not. Just because I don’t want to play football doesn’t mean I’m depressed.

Prac ti tion er: Your father is worrying needlessly. What do you think he’s seeing that makes him worry this way?

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Why?

3. Tanya : I need to come up with some sort of plan to help me get back on track now. This health crisis has thrown me for a loop. I can’t think about anything else. What do you think I should do?

Prac ti tion er: Well, I have some ideas about what might help, but first let me hear what you’ve already consid- ered.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Why?

4. Arthur: I’m not going to keep that stupid thought journal. How does it help me to monitor my “loser” thinking? I’m coming here to feel better, and paying attention to all that makes me feel worse.

Prac ti tion er: OK, Arthur, you might be right. This works for many folks, but not everyone. Maybe we need to try a different way to approach this. We’ve talked about other ways to approach this issue. What makes sense to you to practice instead?

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Why?

5. Tanya : They told me I have to have this surgery right away. But I don’t trust them, so I haven’t scheduled it yet.

23

Rating Samples for MI Spirit (p. 2 of 2)

Prac ti tion er: Why take the chance? They’re the experts, after all. Let’s call from this phone right now—maybe you can get in this week.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Why?

6. Sarah: I’ve had it with Richard’s guilt mongering. Okay, so I had an affair. I’m ready to end it and start working on our marriage, but I don’t think he’s ever going to let me forget it. Maybe we should just get a divorce.

Prac ti tion er: Sarah, you are the only one who can decide if you should stay in this marriage or leave it. I wonder what signs you would need to feel more optimistic about working on things with Richard.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Why?

7. Arthur’s mother (Peggy) : They had a little “surprise party” for me. Everyone showed up when I wasn’t looking and then spent the next 2 hours telling me how my drinking hurt them. They think I’m an alcoholic! I might have a drinking problem, but I’m damn sure not an alcoholic.

Prac ti tion er: (gently) Peggy, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it’s probably a duck. I think if all those people are telling you you’re an alcoholic, they’re probably right. You might be in denial, don’t you think?

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Why?

8. Arthur’s father (Lloyd) : I think Arthur is taking over too many of the household responsibilities. A boy his age ought to be playing sports and chasing girls. Instead, he’s worrying about his younger brother and how the house looks. He even does laundry. I can tell you I never did that at his age. But when I try to push him toward more normal things, like football, he just gets mad at me and says I don’t understand him. What am I supposed to do?

Prac ti tion er: In families where alcohol has been a problem, it often works like this. What if you tried the chess club or the school newspaper instead of pushing him toward football? I think he’d be more receptive to that. I don’t think you recognize how smart Arthur is. It could be that he will never be all that interested in football.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Why?

9. Tanya : My doctor gave me a long list of all the things I have to do to manage my care. It’s overwhelming. I have to take medication three times a day. I can’t even remember to feed my dog every single day. I just can’t do it. But I’m afraid I’ll die if I don’t.

Prac ti tion er: (encouraging) You can do this. You have to.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Why?

Week2_Assignment1.pdfinterview.pdf

Due Dec 10 by 10:59pm Points 50 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2

Start Assignment

Back to Week at a Glance (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157567)

There is an old adage that “practice makes perfect,” which is particularly relevant to learning a new set of skills like those associated with motivational interviewing. Over the next several weeks, the Assignments are designed to give you opportunities to practice specific motivational interviewing skills that are introduced in the Discussions.

In this week’s Discussion, you practiced applying the spirit of motivational interviewing to a service user in the case study to which you were assigned. As you may remember, the spirit of motivational interviewing is a heart-set and mindset that encompasses four elements that are crucial for building a relationship with a service user: partnership, acceptance, compassion, and evocation (Miller & Rollnick, 2013). In this Assignment, you will review a series of practitioner statements to determine whether the statements reflect the spirit of motivational interviewing.

Reference: Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change(3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.

THE SPIRIT OF MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591)

https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157567

https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591

HUMN_6161_Week2_Assignment_Rubric

Review the Learning Resources on the spirit of motivational interviewing. Review the document entitled, “Rating Samples for MI Spirit.” Consider whether each of the exchanges is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Why, or why not?

Submit a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:

Explain whether each exchange in the “Rating Samples for MI Spirit” document is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Why, or why not? Be specific. In instances where you do not believe that the exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing, explain how the practitioner could have responded to be consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Again, be specific.

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK2Assgn1_LastName_Firstinitial.

2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page. 3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

TO PREPARE

BY DAY 7

SUBMISSION AND GRADING INFORMATION

https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591

Criteria Ratings Pts

20 pts

22.5 pts

7.5 pts

Explain whether each exchange in the “Rating Samples for MI Spirit” document is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Why, or why not? Be specific.

20 to >17.8 pts Exceeds Expectations Explanation of whether each exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing is accurate and complete. Specific and convincing justifications are provided.

17.8 to >15.8 pts Meets Expectations Explanation of whether each exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing is mostly accurate and complete. Relevant justifications are provided.

15.8 to >13.8 pts Fair

Explanation of whether each exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing is somewhat inaccurate and/or incomplete. Vague justifications are provided.

13.8 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Explanation of whether each exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing is inaccurate, incomplete, or missing altogether. No justifications are provided.

In instances where you do not believe that the exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing, explain how the practitioner could have responded to be consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Again, be specific.

22.5 to >20.02 pts Exceeds Expectations Explanation of how the practitioner could have responded is specific, appropriate, and consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing.

20.02 to >17.78 pts Meets Expectations Explanation of how the practitioner could have responded is mostly specific, appropriate, and consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing, although there may be minor errors, inaccuracies, or missing details.

17.78 to >15.52 pts Fair Explanation of how the practitioner could have responded is vague, somewhat inaccurate, or somewhat inconsistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. There may be errors, inaccuracies, or missing details.

15.52 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Explanation of how the practitioner could have responded is missing, inaccurate, or inconsistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. There may be major errors, inaccuracies, and missing details.

Scholarly Writing and APA Style

7.5 to >6.68 pts Exceeds Expectations

6.68 to >5.93 pts Meets Expectations

5.93 to >5.18 pts Fair

5.18 to >0 pts Needs Improvement

Total Points: 50

Criteria Ratings Pts

The paper is clear and coherent. Student writes with proper grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation to convey their scholarly message. Fewer than 5 errors occur in the paper. The paper displays proper scholarly voice, organization, and focus. Student paraphrases evidence from scholarly sources correctly and integrates and analyzes it effectively. Includes citations and a reference list that are mostly formatted correctly in APA Style. Headings and paper formatting reflect proper APA.

The paper is mostly clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor, minimal (5-8), and do not interfere with the scholarly message. The paper displays effective scholarly voice, organization, and focus. Student paraphrases evidence from scholarly sources correctly, but integration and analysis could be improved. Includes citations and a reference list, but they contain minor APA errors. Headings and paper formatting contain minor APA errors.

The paper is somewhat clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor but frequent (9-12) and occasionally interfere with the message. The paper has lapses in scholarly voice. The paper lacks clear organization or occasionally strays from the focus. Student occasionally paraphrases source information incorrectly. Includes citations and a reference list, but they contain major APA errors. Headings and paper formatting contain major APA errors.

The paper lacks clarity and coherence. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are major, pervasive (13+), and interfere with the message. The paper shows little or no attention to scholarly voice, organization, and focus. Student consistently paraphrases source information incorrectly (resulting in accidental plagiarism) and/or relies exclusively on direct quotes. Citations are infrequent or missing. Little or no attempt has been made to provide a reference list or to format

HUMN_6161_Week02_RatingSamplesForMISpirit.pdf

Week2_Assignment1.pdfinterview.pdf

HUMN_6161_Week02_RatingSamplesForMISpirit.pdf

Week2_Assignment1.pdfinterview.pdf

Week2_Assignment1.pdfinterview.pdf

HUMN_6161_Week02_RatingSamplesForMISpirit.pdf

Week2_Assignment1.pdfinterview.pdf

HUMN_6161_Week02_RatingSamplesForMISpirit.pdf

Week2_Assignment1.pdfinterview.pdf

Assignment 1: The Spirit of Motivational Interviewing