Week 2 assignment IN

1.Several executives at Hospital ABC decided to implement a new electronic health record system. Six directors were appointed to the selection committee. The committee solicited Request for Proposals (RFPs) from two different vendors. After review of the submitted RFP documents and vendor demonstrations, the committee held a vote. Three of the selection committee members chose Vendor 1 and the other three members of the committee chose Vendor 2. None of the committee members are willing to change their vote.

Who else should have been involved in this decision-making process? Name at least five other stakeholders. What is the rationale for the inclusion of these various stakeholders?

2. Several executives at Hospital ABC decided to implement a new electronic health record system. Six directors were appointed to the selection committee. The committee solicited Request for Proposals (RFPs) from two different vendors. After review of the submitted RFP documents and vendor demonstrations, the committee held a vote. Three of the selection committee members chose Vendor 1 and the other three members of the committee chose Vendor 2. None of the committee members are willing to change their vote.

Considering this scenario, what evaluation criteria should have been in place to prevent this situation?

3. executives at Hospital ABC decided to implement a new electronic health record system. Six directors were appointed to the selection committee. The committee solicited Request for Proposals (RFPs) from two different vendors. After review of the submitted RFP documents and vendor demonstrations, the committee held a vote. Three of the selection committee members chose Vendor 1 and the other three members of the committee chose Vendor 2. None of the committee members are willing to change their vote.

What is the main takeaway lesson learned from this scenario?