value of safety and quality agenda
Suzn
2 years ago
40
files (2)23assessment.pdf
23rubric.pdf
23assessment.pdf
Assessment 3: Instructions Attached Files:
HEAL5001 Assessment 3 Rubric.pdf HEAL5001 Assessment 3 Rubric.pdf - Alternative Formats (423.391 KB) Instructions
Imagine you are working as a safety and quality partner for a health care organisation. You have been
asked to prepare a report and presentation to the executive team to demonstrate the importance of a safety and quality agenda, emphasising the value of organisational culture. The approach has been set and it has been decided to show the value of a safety and quality agenda by examining a major failing in another health care service.
As such select one of the following public inquiries:
Bristol Royal Infirmary
Bundaberg Inquiry
King Edward Memorial Hospital
Royal Liverpool Children's NHS Trust Inquiry
Shipman Inquiry
The Allitt Inquiry
An inquiry of your choice that relates to a health service (check with Sharon if not sure) And summarise the inquiry in a 2,000 word report (+/- 10%), covering the following areas:
What happened?
How it happened?
Who was involved?
Why did it go undetected for a period of time?
What recommendations were made?
What group(s) of professionals were involved?
Who discovered the problem? This is not an exhaustive list of questions; the report can be tackled any way you feel will give the best overall summary and convey the quality and safety implications for health care services.
Once the report is prepared, create a supporting slide deck of no more than 12 slides (including a
title/introductory slide and a wrap up slide) to summarise the report, focusing on the key findings and recommendations. This slide deck will be presented to the executive to support the report, so it should be realistic, concise, clear and well formatted.
Support the slides with notes to include the detail that will be discussed and use the slide itself for the
simple key messages. Use supporting images and graphics where appropriate. See the section on structure below for more information on how to submit the report and presentation as single document.
Please ensure that appropriate APA 7th edition referencing, as per university standards, is included for both the report and presentation as needed.
Structure
A single document must be submitted to Turnitin, therefore the following outline structure is suggested:
1. Cover Page
2. Contents 3. Part A: Report 4. Part B: Presentation
5. References As such the slides will need to be added into the main document ensuring the transcript/slide notes are also copied/visible. The simplest approach will be to copy a slide from PowerPoint and paste it into Word and then copy the slide notes and manually paste them under the copied slide.
Questions
If you have questions about the assignment it is recommended that you post a question on the Discussion Board.
Marking
The marking rubric is attached to show how marks are allocated.
Grades
Grades will be available via Blackboard within three weeks of the submission date.
This assignment is worth 35% and is due by 9.00 am AWST on Friday the 18th October 2024.
23rubric.pdf
HEAL5001: Assessment 3 Rubric
Criteria No Response (0%) Unacceptable (20%) Acceptable (50%) Above Average (80%) Excellent (100%)
Report (50 Marks)
Introduction:
The topic and purpose of the paper are clearly defined in a brief introduction of your inquiry and the context in which the inquiry took place.
(5 marks)
No identifiable introduction.
Inadequate introduction providing little context.
Basic introduction provided.
Good introduction provided suitable context.
Good, concise introduction giving a clear context.
Structure:
Idea development is logical and orderly, with headings and subheadings, presenting a cohesive report.
(5 marks)
No submission made. Little evidence of a cohesive structure supporting idea development.
Some evidence of a cohesive structure supporting idea development.
Generally, a cohesive structure supporting idea development.
A good cohesive structure supporting idea development.
Understanding:
Demonstrates a clear understanding of the inquiry and related issues.
(15 marks)
No knowledge of the subject demonstrated.
Little understanding / knowledge demonstrated.
Attempt made to illustrate understanding.
Reasonably good understanding shown.
Good knowledge and understanding demonstrated.
Criteria No Response (0%) Unacceptable (20%) Acceptable (50%) Above Average (80%) Excellent (100%)
Argument Development and Critical Thinking:
Idea development is logical and orderly, presenting a cohesive argument.
(15 marks)
No argument development or critical thinking demonstrated.
Ideas and arguments are not clearly presented. Little evidence of critical thinking.
Idea and arguments are presented in a reasonably logical manner but could be more clearly articulated. Some evidence of critical thinking.
Idea and arguments are presented in a logical manner. Critical thinking demonstrated.
Idea and arguments are logically presented in a highly considered manner with critical thinking clearly demonstrated.
Conclusion.
(5 marks)
No identifiable conclusion.
Weak conclusion presented.
A few relevant points made in conclusion.
Reasonable summary of main points included in conclusion.
Clear conclusion including good summary of key points.
Formatting, language and grammar.
(5 marks)
No submission made. Contains many spelling, grammar or punctuation errors. Incomplete citations and/or inconsistent referencing. Presentation unacceptable for academic writing.
Contains several spelling, grammar or punctuation errors that distract from flow of the argument. Some citation errors. Reasonable presentation but some inconsistency in formatting.
Contains a few spelling, grammar or punctuation error but they do not distract from flow of the argument. Sources cited correctly. Presentation is neat and consistent.
Free of spelling, grammar and punctuation errors. All sources cited correctly using a consistent referencing style. Presentation is professional and ‘reader-friendly’.
Criteria No Response (0%) Unacceptable (20%) Acceptable (50%) Above Average (80%) Excellent (100%)
Presentation (50 Marks)
Content:
The presentation demonstrates a clear explanation of a health care inquiry, including what happened and why it happened.
(20 marks)
No submission made. The presentation fails to offer a clear explanation of the selected inquiry.
The presentation provides a reasonable explanation of the selected inquiry.
The presentation provides a good explanation of the subject addressing all key points.
The presentation provides an excellent explanation of the subject addressing all key points
Structure:
The presentation is well organised and the subject flows; the slide deck is no more than 12 slides with appropriate opening and closing slides included.
(15 marks)
No submission made. The presentation structure and supporting notes are poor, with key slides and notes missing.
The presentation structure and supporting notes are acceptable and most key slides and notes are present.
The presentation structure and supporting notes are good and all key slides and notes are present.
The presentation structure and supporting notes are excellent and all key slides and notes are present.
Style:
The presentation is clear, engaging and of an academic standard appropriate for the audience.
(15 marks)
No submission made. Basic style, with little engagement with the reader. Contains many spelling, grammar or punctuation errors.
Reasonable presentation and acceptable visual impact. Contains several spelling, grammar or punctuation errors.
Good style, with a level of visual impact that engages the reader. Contains a few spelling, grammar or punctuation error.
Excellent style, with a strong visual impact that engages the reader. Free of spelling, grammar and punctuation errors.
- Sir_Excellence
- Analyze the banking industry from a global and ethical posture. Be sure to be specific as to which ethical posture...
- HTM 421 Reading Assignment Questions “Fast Food Nation…the Dark Side of the all-American Meal” • Anaheim, California had been settled in the late nineteenth century by two different immigrant groups. Who were they and what did they hope to accomplish?
- excelPROF
- IT 205 Assignment Powerpoint ** ONLY IT SPECIALIST PLEASE**
- statistics questions 4
- Human Resource Management Paper
- MBA 6631 Test 5
- SCI250 Week 1 Chapter 3 Staining Lab Quiz
- essay 2 paged on reading an article
