Transforming nursing | Nursing homework help

wk.7.COMPUTERSCIENCEMETHODOLOGIESANDSOCIALDETERMINANTSOFHEALTHDATA.docx

Transforming Nursing

COMPUTER SCIENCE METHODOLOGIES AND SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH DATA

INTRODUCTION

Throughout this course you have delved into many advancements in nursing practice. From technologies for improved patient care to new ways to gather data, the sky seems to be the limit in what science can do and even where these advancements might continue to lead us. However, these advancements may be met with barriers for implementation based on social determinants to health data and care.

In this module, you will explore both innovative tools and the impact of social determinants in health data. Think about what areas of your practice might benefit from the use of technological advancements, and what areas might prove to be barriers for implementation. What experience or narrative might need further exploration to strengthen health literacy? How might social determinants affect the patients or care in your area of practice?

WHAT'S HAPPENING THIS MODULE?

Module 4: Computer Science Methodologies and Social Determinants of Health Data is a 2-week module—Weeks 7 and 8 of the course—in which you will consider the use of advancements in informatics tools on healthcare and clinical practice. As you engage with the resources for this module, you will consider when these types of tools might be useful, as well as consider barriers to implementation. In your Blog Assignments, you will explore these topics and consider your experiences.

COMPUTER SCIENCE METHODOLOGIES

INTRODUCTION

“Technology will change how nurses spend time delivering patient care, but the need for nurses will remain. Nursing experience, knowledge, and skills will transition to learning new ways of thinking about and processing information—the nurse will become the information integrator, health coach, and deliverer of human caring, supported by AI technologies, not replaced by them” (Robert, 2019).

How might advancements in technology impact your practice? Why are these advancements important, as a future DNP-prepared nurse, why is it important to consider the impact of current and future advancements?

This week, you will computer science methodologies, specifically exploring technology advancements as they relate to healthcare and nursing practice. You will analyze the benefits and challenges of the advancements, as well as the impact of use.

Reference: Robert, N. (2019). How artificial intelligence is changing nursing. Nursing Management, 50(9), 30–39. doi:10.1097/01.NUMA.0000578988.56622.21

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Students will:

· Analyze benefits and challenges of computer science methodologies

· Analyze how computer science methodologies may influence healthcare practice and outcomes

· Evaluate computer science methodologies and integration for Big Data

· Compare computer science methodologies

· Analyze how computer science methodologies contribute to Big Data

wk.7.BLOG.INNOVATIVEINFORMATICSTOOLSANDAPPLICATIONSTOCLINICALPRACTICE.docx

Transforming Nursing

DUE APRIL 8

his is a graded discussion: 100 points possible

Week 7: Blog

INNOVATIVE INFORMATICS TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

New technology and tools will undoubtedly shape nursing practice. “Research suggests that between 8% and 16% of nursing time is spent on non-nursing activities and tasks that should be delegated to others” (Robert, 2019). As a result, new innovations may minimize the time spent on these non-nursing activities and tasks to further support and strengthen patient care.

One such technology is the use of robots. While nursing robots are not yet readily available, researchers have earned millions in grants over the last decade researching and developing AI and robotic innovations to improve healthcare and nursing practice. From clinical practice to patient support, the future seems endless with possibilities.

For this Discussion, you will explore various topics associated with innovative technology and your healthcare organization or nursing practice. You will consider how you might utilize these advancements, as well as consider how these advancements might influence nursing informatics.

Reference: Robert, N. (2019). How artificial intelligence is changing nursing. Nursing Management, 50(9), 30–39. doi:10.1097/01.NUMA.0000578988.56622.21

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

TO PREPARE

· Review the Learning Resources associated with the topics: AI, Machine Learning, Genomics, Precision Health, and Robotics.

· Consider the role of these technologies in your healthcare organization or nursing practice.

· Analyze the differences of these technologies as they may impact healthcare delivery and nursing practice.

· Reflect on the potential use of each of these topics and your personal experiences with their implementation into practice.

Post a response to your blog for the following:

· Choose one of the five topics: AI, Machine Learning, Genomics, Precision Health, or Robotics, how has this technology been applied in your practice or in the lives of your patients

· How do you think this innovation will impact the future of your practice?

· Assignment Rubric Details Close

· Rubric

· NURS_8210_Week7_Blog_Rubric

NURS_8210_Week7_Blog_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting: Idea and Content

60 to >49.0 pts

Excellent

• Thoroughly responds to the blog prompt/s. • Post provides comprehensive insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are clearly related to the topic, activity or process identified in blog prompts. • The post reflects in-depth engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

49 to >38.0 pts

Good

• Responds to all of the blog prompt/s. • Post provides insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a reasonably focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are but not fully developed to align with blog prompts. • The post reflects moderate engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

38 to >27.0 pts

Fair

• Partially responds to the blog prompt/s. • Posts are typically short and may contain some irrelevant material. • The post is mostly description or summary without connections or analysis between ideas. • The post reflects minimal engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

27 to >0 pts

Poor

• Does not respond to the blog prompt/s or entries lack insight, depth or are superficial. • The entries are short and are frequently irrelevant to the events. • They do not express opinion clearly and show little understanding. • The post does not reflect engagement with the topic. • Does not post main blog by due date.

60 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response: Post to colleague's main blogpost shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic. NOTE: Responses to faculty are not counted as first or second colleague responses.

20 to >11.0 pts

Excellent

• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

11 to >6.0 pts

Good

• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

6 to >2.0 pts

Fair

• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. • Posts by due date.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The post does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. • Does not post by due date.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response: Post to second colleague blog post shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic.

20 to >11.0 pts

Excellent

• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

11 to >6.0 pts

Good

• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

6 to >2.0 pts

Fair

• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. • Posts by due date.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. • Does not post by due date.

20 pts

Total Points: 100

wk.7.COMPUTERSCIENCEMETHODOLOGIESANDSOCIALDETERMINANTSOFHEALTHDATA.docx

Transforming Nursing

COMPUTER SCIENCE METHODOLOGIES AND SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH DATA

INTRODUCTION

Throughout this course you have delved into many advancements in nursing practice. From technologies for improved patient care to new ways to gather data, the sky seems to be the limit in what science can do and even where these advancements might continue to lead us. However, these advancements may be met with barriers for implementation based on social determinants to health data and care.

In this module, you will explore both innovative tools and the impact of social determinants in health data. Think about what areas of your practice might benefit from the use of technological advancements, and what areas might prove to be barriers for implementation. What experience or narrative might need further exploration to strengthen health literacy? How might social determinants affect the patients or care in your area of practice?

WHAT'S HAPPENING THIS MODULE?

Module 4: Computer Science Methodologies and Social Determinants of Health Data is a 2-week module—Weeks 7 and 8 of the course—in which you will consider the use of advancements in informatics tools on healthcare and clinical practice. As you engage with the resources for this module, you will consider when these types of tools might be useful, as well as consider barriers to implementation. In your Blog Assignments, you will explore these topics and consider your experiences.

COMPUTER SCIENCE METHODOLOGIES

INTRODUCTION

“Technology will change how nurses spend time delivering patient care, but the need for nurses will remain. Nursing experience, knowledge, and skills will transition to learning new ways of thinking about and processing information—the nurse will become the information integrator, health coach, and deliverer of human caring, supported by AI technologies, not replaced by them” (Robert, 2019).

How might advancements in technology impact your practice? Why are these advancements important, as a future DNP-prepared nurse, why is it important to consider the impact of current and future advancements?

This week, you will computer science methodologies, specifically exploring technology advancements as they relate to healthcare and nursing practice. You will analyze the benefits and challenges of the advancements, as well as the impact of use.

Reference: Robert, N. (2019). How artificial intelligence is changing nursing. Nursing Management, 50(9), 30–39. doi:10.1097/01.NUMA.0000578988.56622.21

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Students will:

· Analyze benefits and challenges of computer science methodologies

· Analyze how computer science methodologies may influence healthcare practice and outcomes

· Evaluate computer science methodologies and integration for Big Data

· Compare computer science methodologies

· Analyze how computer science methodologies contribute to Big Data

wk.7.BLOG.INNOVATIVEINFORMATICSTOOLSANDAPPLICATIONSTOCLINICALPRACTICE.docx

Transforming Nursing

DUE APRIL 8

his is a graded discussion: 100 points possible

Week 7: Blog

INNOVATIVE INFORMATICS TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

New technology and tools will undoubtedly shape nursing practice. “Research suggests that between 8% and 16% of nursing time is spent on non-nursing activities and tasks that should be delegated to others” (Robert, 2019). As a result, new innovations may minimize the time spent on these non-nursing activities and tasks to further support and strengthen patient care.

One such technology is the use of robots. While nursing robots are not yet readily available, researchers have earned millions in grants over the last decade researching and developing AI and robotic innovations to improve healthcare and nursing practice. From clinical practice to patient support, the future seems endless with possibilities.

For this Discussion, you will explore various topics associated with innovative technology and your healthcare organization or nursing practice. You will consider how you might utilize these advancements, as well as consider how these advancements might influence nursing informatics.

Reference: Robert, N. (2019). How artificial intelligence is changing nursing. Nursing Management, 50(9), 30–39. doi:10.1097/01.NUMA.0000578988.56622.21

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

TO PREPARE

· Review the Learning Resources associated with the topics: AI, Machine Learning, Genomics, Precision Health, and Robotics.

· Consider the role of these technologies in your healthcare organization or nursing practice.

· Analyze the differences of these technologies as they may impact healthcare delivery and nursing practice.

· Reflect on the potential use of each of these topics and your personal experiences with their implementation into practice.

Post a response to your blog for the following:

· Choose one of the five topics: AI, Machine Learning, Genomics, Precision Health, or Robotics, how has this technology been applied in your practice or in the lives of your patients

· How do you think this innovation will impact the future of your practice?

· Assignment Rubric Details Close

· Rubric

· NURS_8210_Week7_Blog_Rubric

NURS_8210_Week7_Blog_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting: Idea and Content

60 to >49.0 pts

Excellent

• Thoroughly responds to the blog prompt/s. • Post provides comprehensive insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are clearly related to the topic, activity or process identified in blog prompts. • The post reflects in-depth engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

49 to >38.0 pts

Good

• Responds to all of the blog prompt/s. • Post provides insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a reasonably focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are but not fully developed to align with blog prompts. • The post reflects moderate engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

38 to >27.0 pts

Fair

• Partially responds to the blog prompt/s. • Posts are typically short and may contain some irrelevant material. • The post is mostly description or summary without connections or analysis between ideas. • The post reflects minimal engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

27 to >0 pts

Poor

• Does not respond to the blog prompt/s or entries lack insight, depth or are superficial. • The entries are short and are frequently irrelevant to the events. • They do not express opinion clearly and show little understanding. • The post does not reflect engagement with the topic. • Does not post main blog by due date.

60 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response: Post to colleague's main blogpost shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic. NOTE: Responses to faculty are not counted as first or second colleague responses.

20 to >11.0 pts

Excellent

• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

11 to >6.0 pts

Good

• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

6 to >2.0 pts

Fair

• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. • Posts by due date.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The post does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. • Does not post by due date.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response: Post to second colleague blog post shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic.

20 to >11.0 pts

Excellent

• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

11 to >6.0 pts

Good

• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

6 to >2.0 pts

Fair

• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. • Posts by due date.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. • Does not post by due date.

20 pts

Total Points: 100