Threat Modeling Paper

Seton Hill University MBA Cybersecurity Risk Management Written Assignments Requirements and Grading Rubric

Written Assignments Requirements ● Discussion Posts and Replies

○ Participate in online forums as you would in constructive, face-to-face discussions. ○ Postings should continue a conversation and provide avenues for additional continuous dialogue. ○ Do not post “I agree,” or similar, statements. Expand by bringing in related examples, concepts, and experiences.

■ Posts ● 250 words minimum

■ Replies ● At least 1 student’s post ● 150 words minimum

● Papers ○ 3-5 page length (including title page, does not include reference page) ○ Fonts: 11-point Calibri, 11-point Arial, 10-point Lucida Sans Unicode, 12-point Times New Roman, 11-point Georgia, 10-point

Computer Modern ○ Your paper should include four major sections:

■ Title Page (included in 3-5 pages) ● Your Name ● Class Name ● Date ● Title of Assignment

■ Abstract ● Summary of assignment in 3-5 sentences

■ Main Body ● Supporting details and paragraphs

■ References (not included in 3-5 pages) ● APA Formatting and Style ● https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_autho

r_authors.html ● Grading Rubric for Written Assignments

Grading Rubric

Criteria Inadequate=D (Below Standard)

Adequate=C (Meets Standard)

Above Average=B (Exceeds Standard)

Exemplary=A (Far Exceeds Standard)

Organization Writing lacks logical organization. It shows some coherence but ideas lack unity. Serious errors.

Writing is coherent and logically organized. Some points remain misplaced and stray from the topic. Transitions evident but not used throughout the essay.

Writing is coherent and logically organized with transitions used between ideas and paragraphs to create coherence. Overall unity of ideas is present.

Writing shows a high degree of attention to logic and reasoning of points. Unity clearly leads the reader to the conclusion and stirs thought regarding the topic.

Topic focus The topic is not clearly defined. The topic is too broad for the

The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment.

The topic is focused but lacks direction. The paper is about a specific topic but the writer has not established a position.

The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by statement of a position or hypothesis.

Depth of discussion and focus

Cursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections.

The writer has omitted pertinent content or content runs-on excessively. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s own ideas excessively.

In-depth discussion & elaboration in most sections of the paper.

In-depth discussion & elaboration in all sections of the paper

Level of Content Shows some thinking and reasoning but most ideas are underdeveloped and unoriginal.

Content indicates thinking and reasoning applied with original thought on a few ideas.

Content indicates original thinking and develops ideas with sufficient and firm evidence.

Content indicates synthesis of ideas, in depth analysis and evidence, original thought and support for the topic.

Style Mostly in elementary form with little or no variety in sentence structure, diction, rhetorical devices or emphasis.

Approaches college level usage of some variety in sentence patterns, diction, and rhetorical devices.

Attains college level style; tone is appropriate and rhetorical devices used to enhance content; sentence variety used effectively.

Shows outstanding style going beyond usual college level; rhetorical devices and tone used effectively; creative use of sentence structure and coordination

Cohesiveness Does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate understanding any relationships

Sometimes ties together information from all sources. Paper does not flow - disjointedness is apparent. Author's writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.

For the most part, ties together information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. Author's writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.

Ties together information from all sources. Paper flows from one issue to the next without the need for headings. Author's writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.

Sources Not all web sites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current/scientific

All web sites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current/scientific

All web sites utilized are authoritative, and/or sources are current/not scientific

All web sites utilized are authoritative, and/or sources are current and scientific

Grammar & Mechanics

Spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors create distraction, making reading difficult; fragments, comma splices, run-ons evident. Errors are frequent.

Most spelling, punctuation, and grammar are correct allowing the reader to progress through the essay. Some errors remain.

Essay has few spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors allowing the reader to follow ideas clearly. Very few fragments or run-ons.

Essay is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; absent of fragments, comma splices, and run-ons.

Seton Hill University MBA Cybersecurity Risk Management Written Assignments Requirements and Grading Rubric

Written Assignments Requirements ● Discussion Posts and Replies

○ Participate in online forums as you would in constructive, face-to-face discussions. ○ Postings should continue a conversation and provide avenues for additional continuous dialogue. ○ Do not post “I agree,” or similar, statements. Expand by bringing in related examples, concepts, and experiences.

■ Posts ● 250 words minimum

■ Replies ● At least 1 student’s post ● 150 words minimum

● Papers ○ 3-5 page length (including title page, does not include reference page) ○ Fonts: 11-point Calibri, 11-point Arial, 10-point Lucida Sans Unicode, 12-point Times New Roman, 11-point Georgia, 10-point

Computer Modern ○ Your paper should include four major sections:

■ Title Page (included in 3-5 pages) ● Your Name ● Class Name ● Date ● Title of Assignment

■ Abstract ● Summary of assignment in 3-5 sentences

■ Main Body ● Supporting details and paragraphs

■ References (not included in 3-5 pages) ● APA Formatting and Style ● https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_autho

r_authors.html ● Grading Rubric for Written Assignments

Grading Rubric

Criteria Inadequate=D (Below Standard)

Adequate=C (Meets Standard)

Above Average=B (Exceeds Standard)

Exemplary=A (Far Exceeds Standard)

Organization Writing lacks logical organization. It shows some coherence but ideas lack unity. Serious errors.

Writing is coherent and logically organized. Some points remain misplaced and stray from the topic. Transitions evident but not used throughout the essay.

Writing is coherent and logically organized with transitions used between ideas and paragraphs to create coherence. Overall unity of ideas is present.

Writing shows a high degree of attention to logic and reasoning of points. Unity clearly leads the reader to the conclusion and stirs thought regarding the topic.

Topic focus The topic is not clearly defined. The topic is too broad for the

The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment.

The topic is focused but lacks direction. The paper is about a specific topic but the writer has not established a position.

The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by statement of a position or hypothesis.

Depth of discussion and focus

Cursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections.

The writer has omitted pertinent content or content runs-on excessively. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s own ideas excessively.

In-depth discussion & elaboration in most sections of the paper.

In-depth discussion & elaboration in all sections of the paper

Level of Content Shows some thinking and reasoning but most ideas are underdeveloped and unoriginal.

Content indicates thinking and reasoning applied with original thought on a few ideas.

Content indicates original thinking and develops ideas with sufficient and firm evidence.

Content indicates synthesis of ideas, in depth analysis and evidence, original thought and support for the topic.

Style Mostly in elementary form with little or no variety in sentence structure, diction, rhetorical devices or emphasis.

Approaches college level usage of some variety in sentence patterns, diction, and rhetorical devices.

Attains college level style; tone is appropriate and rhetorical devices used to enhance content; sentence variety used effectively.

Shows outstanding style going beyond usual college level; rhetorical devices and tone used effectively; creative use of sentence structure and coordination

Cohesiveness Does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate understanding any relationships

Sometimes ties together information from all sources. Paper does not flow - disjointedness is apparent. Author's writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.

For the most part, ties together information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. Author's writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.

Ties together information from all sources. Paper flows from one issue to the next without the need for headings. Author's writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.

Sources Not all web sites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current/scientific

All web sites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current/scientific

All web sites utilized are authoritative, and/or sources are current/not scientific

All web sites utilized are authoritative, and/or sources are current and scientific

Grammar & Mechanics

Spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors create distraction, making reading difficult; fragments, comma splices, run-ons evident. Errors are frequent.

Most spelling, punctuation, and grammar are correct allowing the reader to progress through the essay. Some errors remain.

Essay has few spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors allowing the reader to follow ideas clearly. Very few fragments or run-ons.

Essay is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; absent of fragments, comma splices, and run-ons.