Social Science - Sociology assignment 1

SOCW_6336_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEmail: Identify two or three examples of areas for improvement... Describe what characteristics or skills could be developed to improve these areas. Explain why these characteristics and skills are important in crisis treatment... Identify one or two areas of strength that the mentee shows in the session. Explain what makes these characteristics or skills important in crisis treatment.

20 to >18.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsResponse meets expectations and exceeds through insightful explanation.

18 to >16.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsResponse identifies two or three areas for improvement. Response describes the characteristics or skills that could be developed to improve the areas for improvement and explains why those characteristics and skills are important in crisis treatment... Response identifies one or two areas of strength... Response explains what makes those characteristics or skills important in crisis treatment.

16 to >14.0 ptsFairResponse identifies areas for improvement and/or areas of strength in an incomplete or vague way. Or the response identifies fewer than the required number of areas... Response provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed description of the characteristics or skills that could be developed to improve the areas for improvement and/or response provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed explanation of why characteristics and skills are important in crisis treatment.

14 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementResponse makes little or no attempt to identify areas for improvement and/or areas of strength, or response makes little or no attempt to describe the characteristics or skills that could be developed to improve the areas for improvement and/or explain why characteristics are important in crisis treatment.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection: Briefly describe why you chose the strengths and areas for improvement that you did in your email to the mentee.

5 to >4.5 ptsExceeds ExpectationsResponse meets expectations and exceeds through insightful explanation.

4.5 to >4.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsResponse identifies two or three areas for improvement. Response describes the characteristics or skills that could be developed to improve the areas for improvement and explains why those characteristics and skills are important in crisis treatment... Response identifies one or two areas of strength... Response explains what makes those characteristics or skills important in crisis treatment.

4 to >3.5 ptsFairResponse identifies areas for improvement and/or areas of strength in an incomplete or vague way. Or the response identifies fewer than the required number of areas... Response provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed description of the characteristics or skills that could be developed to improve the areas for improvement and/or response provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed explanation of why characteristics and skills are important in crisis treatment.

3.5 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementResponse makes little or no attempt to identify areas for improvement and/or areas of strength, or response makes little or no attempt to describe the characteristics or skills that could be developed to improve the areas for improvement and/or explain why characteristics are important in crisis treatment.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection: Explain any insights you gained or conclusions you drew about your own characteristics and skills from completing the interactive media and hypothetical mentoring experience... Explain what steps you can take to develop the characteristics and/or skills that you should acquire or improve.

20 to >18.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsResponse meets expectations and exceeds through insightful explanation.

18 to >16.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsResponse explains insights gained or conclusions drawn about students’ own characteristics and skills... Response explains what steps the student can take to develop the characteristics and/or skills that they should acquire or improve.

16 to >14.0 ptsFairResponse provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed explanation about insights gained or conclusions drawn and/or response provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed explanation of what steps the student can take to develop characteristics or skills.

14 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementResponse makes little or no attempt to explain insights gained or conclusions drawn and/or makes little to no attempt to explain what steps the student can take to develop characteristics or skills.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse the Learning Resources to support your assignment. Make sure to provide APA citations and a reference list.

6 to >5.4 ptsExceeds ExpectationsResponse meets expectations and exceeds through insightful explanation.

5.4 to >4.8 ptsMeets ExpectationsResponse is supported with specific references to resources.

4.8 to >4.2 ptsFairResponse is somewhat supported, but specific references to resources are vague or poorly connected.

4.2 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementResponse is not supported with specific references.

6 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

9 to >8.1 ptsExceeds ExpectationsPaper meets length requirements. Meets expectations, is generally error free (two or fewer), and further exceeds by showcasing an exemplary scholarly voice to develop its message or communicate ideas... Paper appropriately paraphrases sources, using one or less quotes... Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.

8.1 to >7.2 ptsMeets ExpectationsPaper meets length requirements. The paper is clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor, minimal (three to five), and do not interfere with the scholarly message. The paper displays effective organization and focus to communicate ideas... Paper appropriately paraphrases sources. Paper may use two to three short quotes but provides appropriate reference... Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.

7.2 to >6.3 ptsFairPaper does not meet length requirements either somewhat too short or too long. The paper is somewhat clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor but frequent (five to 10) and occasionally interfere with the message. The paper lacks clear organization or occasionally strays from the focus... Paper may rely on four short quotes or one to two long quotes (over 40 words) and/or does not sufficiently paraphrase material from other resources into student's own words... Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.

6.3 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementPaper does not meet length requirements either significantly too short or too long. The paper lacks clarity and coherence. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are major, pervasive (11+), and interfere with the message. The paper is not organized or lacks focus... Paper rely excessively on quoting (five or more quotes) or three or more long quotes (over 40 words), and/or uses quoted material with paraphrasing or referencing the source of the material... Tone and presentation of ideas reveal bias and subjectivity.

9 pts

SOCW_6336_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEmail: Identify two or three examples of areas for improvement... Describe what characteristics or skills could be developed to improve these areas. Explain why these characteristics and skills are important in crisis treatment... Identify one or two areas of strength that the mentee shows in the session. Explain what makes these characteristics or skills important in crisis treatment.

20 to >18.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsResponse meets expectations and exceeds through insightful explanation.

18 to >16.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsResponse identifies two or three areas for improvement. Response describes the characteristics or skills that could be developed to improve the areas for improvement and explains why those characteristics and skills are important in crisis treatment... Response identifies one or two areas of strength... Response explains what makes those characteristics or skills important in crisis treatment.

16 to >14.0 ptsFairResponse identifies areas for improvement and/or areas of strength in an incomplete or vague way. Or the response identifies fewer than the required number of areas... Response provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed description of the characteristics or skills that could be developed to improve the areas for improvement and/or response provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed explanation of why characteristics and skills are important in crisis treatment.

14 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementResponse makes little or no attempt to identify areas for improvement and/or areas of strength, or response makes little or no attempt to describe the characteristics or skills that could be developed to improve the areas for improvement and/or explain why characteristics are important in crisis treatment.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection: Briefly describe why you chose the strengths and areas for improvement that you did in your email to the mentee.

5 to >4.5 ptsExceeds ExpectationsResponse meets expectations and exceeds through insightful explanation.

4.5 to >4.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsResponse identifies two or three areas for improvement. Response describes the characteristics or skills that could be developed to improve the areas for improvement and explains why those characteristics and skills are important in crisis treatment... Response identifies one or two areas of strength... Response explains what makes those characteristics or skills important in crisis treatment.

4 to >3.5 ptsFairResponse identifies areas for improvement and/or areas of strength in an incomplete or vague way. Or the response identifies fewer than the required number of areas... Response provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed description of the characteristics or skills that could be developed to improve the areas for improvement and/or response provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed explanation of why characteristics and skills are important in crisis treatment.

3.5 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementResponse makes little or no attempt to identify areas for improvement and/or areas of strength, or response makes little or no attempt to describe the characteristics or skills that could be developed to improve the areas for improvement and/or explain why characteristics are important in crisis treatment.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection: Explain any insights you gained or conclusions you drew about your own characteristics and skills from completing the interactive media and hypothetical mentoring experience... Explain what steps you can take to develop the characteristics and/or skills that you should acquire or improve.

20 to >18.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsResponse meets expectations and exceeds through insightful explanation.

18 to >16.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsResponse explains insights gained or conclusions drawn about students’ own characteristics and skills... Response explains what steps the student can take to develop the characteristics and/or skills that they should acquire or improve.

16 to >14.0 ptsFairResponse provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed explanation about insights gained or conclusions drawn and/or response provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed explanation of what steps the student can take to develop characteristics or skills.

14 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementResponse makes little or no attempt to explain insights gained or conclusions drawn and/or makes little to no attempt to explain what steps the student can take to develop characteristics or skills.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse the Learning Resources to support your assignment. Make sure to provide APA citations and a reference list.

6 to >5.4 ptsExceeds ExpectationsResponse meets expectations and exceeds through insightful explanation.

5.4 to >4.8 ptsMeets ExpectationsResponse is supported with specific references to resources.

4.8 to >4.2 ptsFairResponse is somewhat supported, but specific references to resources are vague or poorly connected.

4.2 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementResponse is not supported with specific references.

6 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

9 to >8.1 ptsExceeds ExpectationsPaper meets length requirements. Meets expectations, is generally error free (two or fewer), and further exceeds by showcasing an exemplary scholarly voice to develop its message or communicate ideas... Paper appropriately paraphrases sources, using one or less quotes... Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.

8.1 to >7.2 ptsMeets ExpectationsPaper meets length requirements. The paper is clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor, minimal (three to five), and do not interfere with the scholarly message. The paper displays effective organization and focus to communicate ideas... Paper appropriately paraphrases sources. Paper may use two to three short quotes but provides appropriate reference... Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.

7.2 to >6.3 ptsFairPaper does not meet length requirements either somewhat too short or too long. The paper is somewhat clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor but frequent (five to 10) and occasionally interfere with the message. The paper lacks clear organization or occasionally strays from the focus... Paper may rely on four short quotes or one to two long quotes (over 40 words) and/or does not sufficiently paraphrase material from other resources into student's own words... Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.

6.3 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementPaper does not meet length requirements either significantly too short or too long. The paper lacks clarity and coherence. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are major, pervasive (11+), and interfere with the message. The paper is not organized or lacks focus... Paper rely excessively on quoting (five or more quotes) or three or more long quotes (over 40 words), and/or uses quoted material with paraphrasing or referencing the source of the material... Tone and presentation of ideas reveal bias and subjectivity.

9 pts