Social Science GERO320 ASSIGNMENT HELP
HELP PLEASE
3 years ago
11
GERO320FeedbackforResearchPaperStep5.docx
GERO320ResearchPaperStep6.docx
- GERO320INLINEFEEDBACK.pdf
GERO320FeedbackforResearchPaperStep5.docx
Feedback for Research Paper Step 5 - First Draft
Top of Form
|
Submission Feedback |
|
|
|
|
|
Overall Feedback |
|
|
Lauren, This draft is solid. My suggestions are to use age inclusive language (avoid elderly - see note) and to include a discussion on a theoretical framework that helps us understand loneliness and social connection. |
GERO320ResearchPaperStep6.docx
Research Paper Step 6 - Final Draft
Top of Form
|
Hide Assignment Information |
|
|
Turnitin™ |
|
|
|
|
|
Instructions |
|
|
Refer to the syllabus for detailed instructions about this assignment. |
|
|
Due Date |
|
|
Dec 6, 2023 07:59 |
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Research Paper Step 6 - Final Draft
|
Criteria |
Excellent 18 points |
Very Good 17 points |
Good 15 points |
Fair 13 points |
Poor 9 points |
Not Acceptable or Missing 0 points |
Criterion Score |
|
Introduction and Thesis |
Excellent introduction and thesis statement. |
Very good introduction and thesis statement. Missing 1 or 2 minor details. |
Good introduction and thesis statement. Missing several minor details. |
Fair introduction and thesis statement. Missing some major details. |
Poor introduction and thesis statement. Many major details missing. |
Introduction and/or thesis statement is not understandable -or- No introduction or thesis statement |
Score of Introduction and Thesis, / 18 |
|
Significance of the Topic |
Excellent statement of the significance and relevance of the topic. |
Very good statement of the significance and relevance of the topic. Missing 1 or 2 minor details. |
Good statement of the significance and relevance of the topic, with several minor details missing. |
Fair statement of the significance and relevance of the topic, with some major details missing. |
Difficult to understand or insufficient statement of the significance and relevance of the topic. |
Significance of the topic is not addressed. |
Score of Significance of the Topic, / 18 |
|
Theoretical Background |
Excellent and comprehensive discussion of theoretical background related to the topic |
Very good discussion of the theoretical background related to the topic, with 1-2 minor details missing |
Good discussion of the theoretical background related to the topic, with several minor details missing |
Fair discussion of the theoretical background related to the topic, with several major details missing |
Poor discussion of the theoretical background related to the topic, with many minor details missing |
Response is not understandable -or- No discussion of theoretical background |
Score of Theoretical Background, / 18 |
|
Current Research |
Excellent incorporation of at least 10 recent, credible and relevant sources which examine current research. Sources are primarily scholarly academic sources and examine social determinant effects. |
Effectively incorporates 8-9 recent, credible and relevant sources which examine current research. May have 1 or 2 nonacademic sources, but uses a number of scholarly academic sources. |
Effectively incorporates 6-7 recent, credible and relevant sources which examine current research. May have 1 or 2 nonacademic sources, but uses a few scholarly academic sources. |
Effectively incorporates 4-5 recent, credible and relevant sources which examine current research. May have 1 or 2 nonacademic sources, but uses a few scholarly academic sources. |
Effectively incorporates 1-3 recent, credible and relevant sources which examine current research. May rely almost exclusively on nonacademic sources. |
Does not incorporate any recent, credible, and relevant sources that examine current research -or- No discussion of current research |
Score of Current Research, / 18 |
|
Role of Public Policy |
Excellent and comprehensive discussion of the role that public policy plays in relation to the topic |
Very good discussion of the role that public policy plays in relation to the topic, with 1-2 minor details missing |
Good discussion of the role that public policy plays in relation to the topic, with several minor details missing |
Fair discussion of the role that public policy plays in relation to the topic, with several major details missing |
Poor discussion of the role that public policy plays in relation to the topic, with major details missing |
Response is not understandable -or- No discussion of the role of public policy |
Score of Role of Public Policy, / 18 |
|
Proposal of an Evidence-Based Policy |
Excellent and comprehensive proposal for an evidence-based policy related to the topic that will serve older adults |
Very good proposal for an evidence-based policy related to the topic that will serve older adults, with 1-2 minor details missing |
Good proposal for an evidence-based policy related to the topic that will serve older adults, with several minor details missing |
Fair proposal for an evidence-based policy related to the topic that will serve older adults, with several major details missing |
Poor proposal for an evidence-based policy related to the topic that will serve older adults, with many major details missing |
Response is not understandable -or- No proposal presented |
Score of Proposal of an Evidence-Based Policy, / 18 |
|
Conclusion |
Excellent conclusion that effectively summarizes the main points of the paper, highlights the importance of the work and suggests future directions. |
Very good conclusion that effectively summarizes the main points of the paper and highlights the importance of the work and suggests future directions. Missing 1 or 2 minor details. |
Good conclusion that summarizes the main points of the paper and highlights the importance of the work and suggests future directions. Missing several minor details. |
Fair conclusion that summarizes the main points of the paper but is missing several major details. |
Poor conclusion that does not effectively summarize the main points of the paper and is missing many major details. |
Response is not understandable -or- No conclusion |
Score of Conclusion, / 18 |
|
Criteria |
Excellent 12 points |
Very Good 11 points |
Good 10 points |
Fair 8 points |
Poor 6 points |
Not Acceptable or Missing 0 points |
Criterion Score |
|
Writing Quality |
Very well-written. There are no mechanical or grammatical errors. |
There are very few mechanical or grammatical errors. |
There are several minor mechanical or grammatical errors. |
There are several major mechanical or grammatical errors. |
There are many major mechanical or grammatical errors that impact readability. |
Response is not understandable -or- No submission |
Score of Writing Quality, / 12 |
|
APA Citations and Formatting |
There are no errors in APA citation or formatting. |
There are 1-2 minor errors in citation or formatting. |
There are several minor errors in citation or formatting. |
There are several major errors in citation or formatting. |
There are many major errors in citation or formatting. |
Citations are missing -and/or- No attempt at formatting |
Score of APA Citations and Formatting, / 12 |
Total
Score of Research Paper Step 6 - Final Draft,
/ 150
Overall Score
Excellent
135 points minimum
Good
120 points minimum
Fair
105 points minimum
Poor
0 points minimum
|
|
image1.gif
- marketing discussion
- NR 305 All Discussions Week 1 - 7
- NRS-427V Week 4 CLC: Community Assessment and Analysis Presentation [27 Slides + Speaker Notes]
- Case Study Analysis I
- Assignment 2: Exploring Interests to Identify Research Problems
- STR 581 Week 5 Learning Team Peer Evaluation. Get an A++.
- Final paper needs to be completed based upon instructors instructions.
- Yeung Analysis
- Immigration: Face of America HTY-110
- Quasi-Experimental Designs/Due Sunday 5 pm