Scientific method

The Nature of Knowing: The Scientific Method

The scientific method is not limited to laboratory experiments. It is a systematic

way of thinking that applies to all fields of study, including the social sciences. Scholars

agree that rigorous research follows similar steps no matter the discipline (Kunisch et al.,

2023). Understanding these steps helps readers make sense of research reports and judge

their quality. This paper reviews the main stages of the scientific method, explains how

we use it to understand “how we know,” and describes the two main research paradigms:

quantitative and qualitative research.

(a) Main Steps in the Scientific Method and Their Link to Research Reports

The scientific method begins with identifying a problem or question. In social

research, this step involves reviewing existing literature and defining a clear research

problem (Creswell & Guetterman, 2025). Researchers then develop hypotheses or

guiding questions to focus the study (McGregor, 2018). The next step is designing the

study. This includes choosing the methods, participants, and instruments to gather data.

After that, researchers collect and analyze data to test their hypotheses or answer their

research questions (Dane & Carhart, 2022). The process ends with interpreting the results

and drawing conclusions, which are then shared publicly.

These steps match the structure of most research reports. The introduction states

the problem and reviews relevant literature. The methods section explains the design and

data collection processes. The results section presents the data analysis, and the

discussion interprets the findings and relates them back to the original problem. Finally,

conclusions and recommendations point to future research or practical applications

2

(Ahmadin, 2022). This format allows readers to follow the scientific reasoning behind the

study and decide whether the evidence is credible.

(b) “How We Know” Through the Scientific Method

The phrase “how we know” refers to the process by which humans move from

personal opinions to evidence-based understanding. The scientific method offers a

systematic way to do so. By stating research questions clearly, being systematic, and

reporting findings openly, researchers reduce bias and enhance reliability (Kunisch et al.,

2023). For example, a social scientist studies attitudes on community health approaches

with assumptions, but must get actual data to test, validate, or invalidate them. The

process transforms subjective notions into objectifiable knowledge (McGregor, 2018).

Therefore, the scientific approach establishes a mutually accessible foundation of

evidence that others may test, question, and use, supporting people's confidence in

research findings (Creswell & Guetterman, 2025).

(c) Quantitative and Qualitative Research Paradigms

Quantitative research is the application of figures and statistics to measure

variables. Quantitative research tests hypotheses, looks for patterns, and enables one to

make generalized results to larger groups (Dane & Carhart, 2022). Quantitative research

is perfect when one wants to measure the number of a phenomenon, for example, the

proportion of individuals who favor a policy. Qualitative research examines meaning,

experience, and context. Qualitative research applies interviews, observation, and

document analysis to generate rich descriptive data, not figures (Creswell & Guetterman,

2025). Researchers use it when they want to understand why or how something happens,

3

such as how teachers adapt new curricula. Both paradigms are important, and many

studies combine them to gain a fuller picture (Ahmadin, 2022).

Conclusion

The scientific method provides a universal means to produce knowledge across

disciplines. Through its steps, researchers produce reports that are understandable and

credible. Understanding "how we know" using the method enhances our competence in

quality research appraisal. Finally, both number-based and description-based methods are

valuable tools that, if correctly utilized, answer a wide array of questions in the social

sciences.

References

Ahmadin, M. (2022). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.

Jurnal Kajian Sosial Dan Budaya: Tebar Science, 6(1), 104–113.

https://ejournal.tebarscience.com/index.php/JKSB/article/view/103

Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2025). Educational research: Planning,

conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (7th ed.).

Pearson.

Dane, F. C., & Carhart, E. (2022). Evaluating research: Methodology for people who

need to read research (3rd ed.). Sage.

Kunisch, S., Denyer, D., Bartunek, J. M., Menz, M., & Cardinal, L. B. (2023). Review

research as scientific inquiry. Organizational Research Methods, 26(1), 3–45.

https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281221127292

McGregor, S. L. T. (2018). Understanding and evaluating research: A critical guide.

Sage.