Scholarly Reflective
2 years ago
8
SOWK910AssessmentTwoGuidelinesandRubric_24.docx
- AASW-Practice-Standards-FEB2023-1.pdf
SOWK910AssessmentTwoGuidelinesandRubric_24.docx
SOWK910 Scholarly Reflective Essay- Assessment Two Guidelines and Rubric
|
Detailed information |
Students are to identify a current issue for a vulnerable population group and to reflect on their opinion on this issue. They are to refer to the AASW Practice Standards to justify their opinion and to use a range of scholarly references to support their argument. |
|
Marking Criteria |
· A current issue for a vulnerable population is identified and justified using the AASW Practice Standards · The student’s opinion is argued critically and draws on scholarly references to support the argument · Social work theory and critical social work concepts such as power and social injustice are draw on to further the argument · UOW Harvard referencing style is used consistently and the content is in line with social work ethics and professional conduct (including spelling, punctuation, grammar and word count) |
|
Length |
Essay format- 1500 words |
|
Weighting |
30% |
|
Assessment Due |
10 May 2024 Final submission time: 11:59pm |
|
Type of Collaboration |
Individual assessment |
|
Assessment submission |
Online via Moodle This assessment has been set up to be checked by Turnitin, a tool which helps you check whether you have referenced correctly. You can submit your assessment task to Turnitin prior to the due date and Turnitin will give you an originality report. You may then make any changes that may be required and resubmit your final version by the due date. |
|
Assessment return |
Marks will be posted on Moodle following the due date. |
The Scholarly Reflective Essay for Assessment Two is to:
· Be 1500 words long (+/- 10%)
· Scholarly references and set readings from SOWK910 need to be included, such as journal articles and books. Websites that cannot directly source the author (such as Wikipedia) should not be included. News articles where the author can be directly referenced can be included.
· UOW Harvard refencing style is to be used.
· The writing style should use first person voice as the central argument is the student’s opinion. The opinion though must be justified using the AASW Practice Standards and scholarly references and must be in line with social work ethics and professional conduct.
SOWK910 Assessment Two Marking Rubric
|
Criteria
|
Fail (0-49%) |
Pass (50-64%) |
Credit (65-74%) |
Distinction (75-84%) |
High Distinction (85-100%) |
|
A current issue for a vulnerable population is identified and justified using the AASW Practice Standards (eg. the student has picked a vulnerable group, explained why they are considered vulnerable, and used the Practice Standards to argue why social work should work with them).
|
A current issue for a vulnerable population is not clearly identified AND/OR is not justified using the AASW Practice Standards |
A current issue for a vulnerable population is identified AND makes reference to the AASW Practice Standards |
A current issue for a vulnerable population is clearly identified AND there is adequate justification using the AASW Practice Standards |
A current issue for a vulnerable population is clearly identified AND there is strong justification using the AASW Practice Standards |
A current issue for a vulnerable population is clearly identified AND there is strong and in-depth justification using the AASW Practice Standards |
|
The student’s opinion is written in first person voice and is both argued critically and draws on scholarly references and set readings from SOWK910 to support the argument.
|
The student’s opinion is not evident AND/OR: · It is not written in first person voice · It is not argued critically · It does not draw on scholarly references and set readings from SOWK910 to support the argument
|
The student’s opinion is evident AND/OR: · Is written in first person voice · Is somewhat argued critically · Draws minimally on scholarly references and set readings from SOWK910 to support the argument |
The student’s opinion is evident AND: · Is written in first person voice · Is adequately argued critically · Draws adequately on scholarly references and set readings from SOWK910 to support the argument |
The student’s opinion is clearly presented AND: · Is written in first person voice · Is strongly argued critically · Draws strongly on scholarly references and set readings from SOWK910 to support the argument
|
The student’s opinion is clearly presented AND: · Is written in first person voice · Is thoroughly argued critically · Draws strongly on scholarly references and set readings from SOWK910 to support the argument
|
|
Social work theory from SOWK910 and critical social work concepts such as power and social injustice are draw on to further the argument.
|
There is no evidence of social work theory from SOWK910 and critical social work concepts such as power and social injustice in the argument
|
There is some but minimal evidence that social work theory from SOWK910 and critical social work concepts such as power and social injustice have been draw on to further the argument |
There is some evidence that social work theory from SOWK910 and critical social work concepts such as power and social injustice have been draw on to further the argument |
There is consistent evidence that social work theory from SOWK910 and critical social work concepts such as power and social injustice have been draw on to further the argument
|
There is in-depth evidence that social work theory from SOWK910 and critical social work concepts such as power and social injustice have been draw on to further the argument |
|
UOW Harvard referencing style is used consistently and the content is in line with social work ethics and professional conduct (including spelling, punctuation, grammar and word count).
|
· The content is not in line with social work ethics and professional conduct (including spelling, punctuation, grammar and word count) · The content does not use UOW Harvard referencing style |
· The content uses UOW Harvard referencing style, however inconsistently |
· The content is largely in line with social work ethics and professional conduct (including spelling, punctuation, grammar and word count) · The content uses UOW Harvard referencing style across the majority of the essay |
· The content is completely in line with social work ethics and professional conduct (including spelling, punctuation, grammar and word count) · The content uses UOW Harvard referencing style consistently across the essay
|
· The content is completely in line with social work ethics and professional conduct (including spelling, punctuation, grammar and word count) · The content uses UOW Harvard referencing style consistently across the essay |
- Medicare
- bp
- Creating a Child Health, Safety, and Nutrition Blog
- Paraphrase Sentences
- Consider the ANOVA table that follows
- 1.a hypothesis test analysis to determine if there is a statistical difference between the
- Some information about auto theft rates (number of auto thefts per 100,000 population) for a
- According to data collected, 0.6% of Facebook users are under 13
- Missing table 1-4
- 500words essay about music