Risk Management in Health Care
Minicaa
7 months ago
20
files (2)RiskManagementAssignment.docx
Rubric-RiskManagementinHealthCare.pdf
RiskManagementAssignment.docx
Trends are heavily informed by local, state, and federal health care legislation. Write a 750-1,000 word paper that compares the effect of local, state, and federal health care legislation within organizations by identifying trends. Be sure to address the following:
1. Describe the role of risk management in healthcare operations.
2. Discuss general trends in healthcare legislation over the past 5 years.
3. Discuss the trends of legislation on health care overall in the United States.
Support your essay by including two sources.
Rubric-RiskManagementinHealthCare.pdf
Risk Management in Health Care - Rubric Total 90 points
Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Less than
Satisfactory 3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent
Risk Management in Health
Care
Risk Management in Health
Care
0 points
A description of the role of
risk management in health
care operations is not
included or is inaccurate. The
description lacks an
understanding of the
content.
8.78 points
A description of the role of
risk management in health
care operations is unclear
and demonstrates a lack of
understanding of the
content.
10.13 points
The essay includes a basic
description of the role of risk
management in health care
operations.
11.48 points
A description of the role of
risk management in health
care operations is clear and
contains the major points
with details.
13.5 points
A description of the role of
risk management in health
care operations is detailed
and demonstrates a deep
understanding of the
content.
Trends in Health Care
Legislation
Trends in Health Care
Legislation
0 points
A description of the trends in
health care legislation is
absent, inappropriate, or
irrelevant.
8.78 points
A description of the trends in
health care legislation is
weak or marginal with gaps.
The trends are not within the
last 5 years. Some supporting
sources are present but do
not show an understanding
of the content.
10.13 points
A description of the trends in
health care legislation is at
the cursory level and
contains minimal gaps. Some
of the trends are within the
last 5 years. Supporting
sources show some
understanding of the
content.
11.48 points
A description of the trends in
health care legislation is clear
and integrated and contains
no gaps. Most trends are
within the last 5 years.
Supporting sources illustrate
an understanding of the
content.
13.5 points
A description of the trends in
health care legislation is
thorough and well integrated
and contains no gaps. The
trends are within the last 5
years. Supporting sources
illustrate a deep
understanding of the
content.
Specific Legislation
Specific Legislation
0 points
A description of a specific
piece of legislation and how
it governs a long trending
health care concern is
absent, inappropriate, or
irrelevant.
8.78 points
A description of a specific
piece of legislation and how
it governs a long trending
health care concern is weak
or marginal and contains
gaps. Motivating factors that
have influenced this
particular legislation show an
understanding of the
content.
10.13 points
A description of a specific
piece of legislation and how
it governs a long trending
health care concern is at the
cursory level and contains
minimal gaps. Motivating
factors that have influenced
this particular legislation
show some understanding of
the content.
11.48 points
A description of a specific
piece of legislation and how
it governs a long trending
health care concern is clear
and integrated and contains
no gaps. Motivating factors
that have influenced this
particular legislation
illustrate an understanding
of the content.
13.5 points
A description of a specific
piece of legislation and how
it governs a long trending
health care concern is
thorough and well integrated
and contains no gaps.
Motivating factors that have
influenced this particular
legislation illustrate a deep
understanding of the
content.
Trending Legislation on the
Health Care Setting
Trending Legislation on the
Health Care Setting
0 points
A description of the trending
legislation on health care in
the United States is absent,
inappropriate, or irrelevant.
A description of how a
selected piece of legislation
affects one type of health
care setting is absent,
inappropriate, or irrelevant.
8.78 points
A description of the trending
legislation on health care in
the United States is weak or
marginal with gaps. A
description of how a selected
piece of legislation affects
one type of health care
setting is weak or marginal
and contains gaps. A
description of changes in a
selected health care setting
that have occurred in order
to meet the requirement or
needs of this legislation
trend is weak or marginal
and contains gaps.
Motivating factors that have
influenced this legislation
show an understanding of
the content.
10.13 points
A description of the trending
legislation on health care in
the United States is at the
cursory level and contains
minimal gaps. A description
of how a selected piece of
legislation affects one type of
health care setting is at the
cursory level and contains
minimal gaps. A description
of changes in a selected
health care setting that have
occurred in order to meet
the requirement or needs of
this legislation trend is at the
cursory level and contains
minimal gaps. Motivating
factors that have influenced
this legislation show some
understanding of the
content.
11.48 points
A description of the trending
legislation on health care in
the United States is clear and
integrated and contains no
gaps. A description of how a
selected piece of legislation
affects one type of health
care setting is clear and
integrated and contains no
gaps. A description of
changes in a selected health
care setting that have
occurred in order to meet
the requirement or needs of
this legislation trend is clear
and integrated and contains
no gaps. Motivating factors
that have influenced this
legislation illustrate an
understanding of the
content.
13.5 points
A description of the trending
legislation on health care in
the United States is thorough
and well integrated and
contains no gaps. A
description of how a selected
piece of legislation affects
one type of health care
setting is thorough and well
integrated and contains no
gaps. A description of
changes in a selected health
care setting that have
occurred in order to meet
the requirement or needs of
this legislation trend contain
is thorough and well
integrated and contains no
gaps. Motivating factors that
have influenced this
legislation illustrate a deep
understanding of the
content.
Stakeholders
Stakeholders
0 points
A description of how
stakeholders have been
affected by the trending
legislation is absent,
inappropriate, or irrelevant.
5.85 points
A description of how
stakeholders have been
affected by the trending
legislation is weak or
marginal and contains gaps.
6.75 points
A description of how
stakeholders have been
affected by the trending
legislation is at the cursory
7.65 points
A description of how
stakeholders have been
affected by the trending
legislation is clear and
9 points
A description of how
stakeholders have been
affected by the trending
legislation is thorough and
© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Less than
Satisfactory 3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent
level and contains minimal
gaps.
integrated and contains no
gaps.
well integrated and contains
no gaps.
Thesis Development and
Purpose
Thesis Development and
Purpose
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible
overall purpose or organizing
claim.
4.1 points
Thesis is insufficiently
developed or vague. Purpose
is not clear.
4.73 points
Thesis is apparent and
appropriate to purpose.
5.35 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts
the development of the
paper. Thesis is descriptive
and reflective of the
arguments and appropriate
to the purpose.
6.3 points
Thesis is comprehensive and
contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement
makes the purpose of the
paper clear.
Argument Logic and
Construction
Argument Logic and
Construction
0 points
Statement of purpose is not
justified by the conclusion.
The conclusion does not
support the claim made.
Argument is incoherent and
uses noncredible sources.
4.68 points
Sufficient justification of
claims is lacking. Argument
lacks consistent unity. There
are obvious flaws in the logic.
Some sources have
questionable credibility.
5.4 points
Argument is orderly, but may
have a few inconsistencies.
The argument presents
minimal justification of
claims. Argument logically,
but not thoroughly, supports
the purpose. Sources used
are credible. Introduction
and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
6.12 points
Argument shows logical
progression. Techniques of
argumentation are evident.
There is a smooth
progression of claims from
introduction to conclusion.
Most sources are
authoritative.
7.2 points
Clear and convincing
argument presents a
persuasive claim in a
distinctive and compelling
manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing
(includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar,
language use)
Mechanics of Writing
(includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar,
language use)
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive
enough that they impede
communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is
used.
2.93 points
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors distract
the reader. Inconsistencies in
language choice (register) or
word choice are present.
Sentence structure is correct
but not varied.
3.38 points
Some mechanical errors or
typos are present, but they
are not overly distracting to
the reader. Correct and
varied sentence structure
and audience-appropriate
language are employed.
3.82 points
Prose is largely free of
mechanical errors, although
a few may be present. The
writer uses a variety of
effective sentence structures
and figures of speech.
4.5 points
Writer is clearly in command
of standard, written,
academic English.
Paper Format (use of
appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
Paper Format (use of
appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
0 points
Template is not used
appropriately, or
documentation format is
rarely followed correctly.
2.93 points
Appropriate template is
used, but some elements are
missing or mistaken. A lack
of control with formatting is
apparent.
3.38 points
Appropriate template is
used. Formatting is correct,
although some minor errors
may be present.
3.82 points
Appropriate template is fully
used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
4.5 points
All format elements are
correct.
Documentation of Sources
Documentation of Sources
(citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc.,
as appropriate to assignment
and style)
0 points
Sources are not documented.
2.93 points
Documentation of sources is
inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment
and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
3.38 points
Sources are documented, as
appropriate to assignment
and style, although some
formatting errors may be
present.
3.82 points
Sources are documented, as
appropriate to assignment
and style, and format is
mostly correct.
4.5 points
Sources are completely and
correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment
and style, and format is free
of error.
© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
- psychology hw
- for speech class/ speech preparation
- CF Unit 5 P11-2 Witt Corporation received its charter during January 2014. The charter authorized the following capital stock
- The firm manufactures a global positioning system (GPS) that sells for $2,000, with cost of goods sold (hardware 30% and software 70%) of 55% of sales. Compared to the United States, China offers a 7% cost reduction in electronics manufacturing hardware a
- onnne
- FOR A-PLUS WRITER ONLy
- We study several personality models this week and learn how personality shapes the workplace environment. Last week you discovered your KTS-II personality type. Share with your colleagues in this forum what your personality type is (Guardian/Rational/Idea
- Discussion 5
- Saima and jack are looking into a wishing well. Saima says that she can almost reach the money in it....
- Write a two-page paper describing a basic experimental design for the proposal. Design a basic experiment to assess a cause and effect relationship based on your research question. Include the following information: 1. Research the objective.
