Response two Colleagues

Due Friday May 1 by 7pm Central Standard Time

Respond to two colleagues

Reading

1. Dudley, J. R. (2014). Social work evaluation: Enhancing what we do. (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books.

· Chapters 9, “Is the Intervention Effective?” (pp. 213–250)

· Chapter 10, “Analyzing Evaluation Data” (pp. 255–275)

2. . McNamara, C. (2006a). Contents of an evaluation plan. In Basic guide to program evaluation (including outcomes evaluation). Retrieved from http://managementhelp.org/evaluation/program-evaluation-guide.htm#anchor1586742

3. McNamara, C. (2006b). Reasons for priority on implementing outcomes-based evaluation.In Basic guide to outcomes-based evaluation for nonprofit organizations with very limited resources. Retrieved from http://managementhelp.org/evaluation/outcomes-evaluation-guide.htm#anchor30249

Colleague Marla Attached Document

Colleague Joy Attached Document

Respond to at least two colleagues from the perspective of an interested stakeholder for the program by doing the following:

· Provide a brief description of the role that you are taking. 

· Provide an evaluation of the group research design that they have chosen, and criteria that your colleagues have generated (choice of outcome and method of evaluation) from the perspective of the stakeholder whom you have chosen.

· Provide support based on your evaluation

· Ask questions about the plan for research design and the questions that the evaluation plan will address from your chosen perspective.

APA format intext citations and references