response to discussion questions

You stated, "Therefore, the obscenity of the act does not lie so much in its nature as in its eventual transcendence to third parties, giving the example of that person who makes "waters" that is not obscene at all, but who becomes when it is done in the presence of third parties which they have not consented to witness it."

If you were asked at a community meeting to explain this statement in simple terms, how might you do that?

150 words