Research due in 4 days

Grading Rubric for Research Question Paper

NAME & ID#:

Awarded

Possible 100%

Research Question reflects an aspect of HRM in a global economy.

(25)

Research question and background has strong correlations to HRM in global economy. Clear evidence that sources relevant to research question. Elements are supported by references from the appropriate sources and properly cited. ((25)

Research question and background has adequate correlations to HRM in global economy. Most of the content is presented and described adequately.

Some elements may lack coherence or details necessary for further analysis.

Some references for content may

be missing. (20)

The research question and background is partially presented and not well described.

Elements are missing and not supported by sources.

(15)

The research question does not correlate to HRM in a global economy. No background to the question provided. There are many missing elements and/or the elements presented are not sourced .

(10)

Final analysis.

(30)

Excellent discussion and final analysis to the research question. Well written and logical progression of thought in own words.

Clear evidence that sources are referred to in analysis and properly cited.

Demonstrated excellent level of understanding of course material. (30)

Adequate discussion and final analysis to the research question.

Statements are moderately well written with room for improvement. Demonstrated average level of understanding of course material. (25)

The research question and background are partially presented and not well described.

The understanding of course material is less than expectations. (20)

The paper includes poorly written reasoning and analysis. Most elements of the writing are not sourced.

(15)

Scholarly

Reference/Sources

(15)

Minimum of 5 academic/scholarly sources used for paper.

References from reliable and credible academic and scholarly sources and

properly cited. (15)

3 – 4 academic/scholarly sources used for paper.

Some sources not from scholarly source. (10)

References questionable as scholarly/academic. References not cited in paper. (7.5)

Poor references not obtained from scholarly/academic source. (5)

Formatting, &

Referencing

(20)

Includes:

Title page, Page numbers, Table of

Contents, Headings/Titles, Citations,

References

Clean and professional looking. Any graphics presented were done professionally. Quotations and works cited conform to APA style. (20)

Some elements of proper formatting missing. Citations done properly.

Mostly clean and professional looking.

Any graphics presented were done professionally.

(15)

Demonstrated lack of proofreading. Included some proper formatting but elements missing. Citations missing or not included.

No page numbers. (10)

No cover page or page numbers.

References are not cited correctly according to APA style, nor listed correctly on the reference page or missing. (5)

Demonstration of

writing skills

(10)

Excellent grammar, spelling and punctuation. The writing was clear and logical. Excellent use of sources cited as per APA style.

Length of paper reasonable.

(10)

A few errors in grammar, spelling, syntax, or punctuation, and citations, but not many. Some sources not cited. Length of paper too short or too long

(7.5)

Shows pattern of errors in spelling, grammar, syntax, or punctuation and citations. Many sources not cited. Length of paper too short or too long. (5)

Continuous spelling, grammar, syntax, or punctuation errors. Unprofessional. Length of paper not acceptable.

Rare citation of original source.(2)

100