Reflection 2

profileI am me

 Look through everything correctly from the "what to do" attachment.

There is chapter 10 attached as well.

  • 3 years ago
  • 7
files (2)

Whattodo.pdf

The Reflections, which will occur after our readings and review, are designed to evaluate your understanding of and facility with the critical perspective introduced and discussed during the week.

Reflection Paper will be in a one-page single spaced typed word document (400-500 words). In each reflection paper you must include at least 4 terms from the textbook that are embolden or underlined.

In the reflection paper, you must define and explain those terms in your own words, and must be able to provide examples that would demonstrate your understanding of those concepts. Please DO NOT copy from the book, the reflection paper is supposed to be written in your own words.

The terms for this reflection paper come from Chapter 10 of the book which is about Small Group Communication.

To make your lives easier, I have made the list of the terms for you:

Grouphate

Primary Groups

Secondary Groups

Group Roles

Individual Role

Task Roles

Relational Roles

Trait Theory

Functional Theory

Shared Leadership

Style Theory

Authoritarian Theory

Democratic Leader

Laissez-faire

Transformational Leadership

Charismatic Leadership

Servant Leadership

Analysis Paralysis

Primary Tension

Secondary Tension

Emergence Phase

Reinforcement Phase

Groupthink

The criteria for evaluation of this paper is as follows:

Total: 30 Points

Criterion Mediocre/ Does not meet the standards

Average/Improvements are needed

Expectations are Met

The length of the paper (400- 500 words)

0 (Paper is less than 350 words)

2.5 (Paper is 350-400 words)

5 (Paper is 400-500 words)

Paper is free of Typos and horrendous grammatical errors

0 (Paper is difficult to read/comprehend due to numerous typos and grammatical errors)

2.5 (There are some grammatical errors and typos)

5 (Paper has very few ,if any,grammatical errors and typos)

Term #1 - explanation and example provided indicate fair understanding of the term/concept.

0 (Definition/example comes from the textbook and/or the lecture and/or PowerPoint uploaded by the instructor)

2.5 (Either the definition or the example of the term or concept is flawed)

5 (Both definition and the example of the term are clear, concise and written in the student's words)

Term #2 - explanation and example provided indicate fair understanding of the term/concept.

0 (Definition/example comes from the textbook and/or the lecture and/or PowerPoint uploaded by the instructor)

2.5 (Either the definition or the example of the term or concept is flawed)

5 (Both definition and the example of the term are clear, concise and written in the student's words)

Term #3 - explanation and example provided indicate fair understanding of the term/concept.

0 (Definition/example comes from the textbook and/or the lecture and/or PowerPoint uploaded by the instructor)

2.5 (Either the definition or the example of the term or concept is flawed)

5 (Both definition and the example of the term are clear, concise and written in the student's words)

Term #4 - explanation and example provided indicate fair understanding of the term/concept.

0 (Definition/example comes from the textbook and/or the lecture and/or PowerPoint uploaded by the instructor)

2.5 (Either the definition or the example of the term or concept is flawed)

5 (Both definition and the example of the term are clear, concise and written in the student's words)