redo
2 years ago
30
ResourcesAssess2.docx
Assess2.docx
- AnalysisofPositionPapersforVulnerablePopulations.docx
- ExampleAssess2.pdf
ResourcesAssess2.docx
Use the resources linked below to help complete this assessment.
Collapse All
Assessment
Assessment
· Kiekens, A., Dierckx de Casterlé, D. & Vandamme, A. (2022). Qualitative systems mapping for complex public health problems: A practical guide. PLoS One, 17(2). http://dx.doi.org.library.capella.edu/10.1371/journal.pone.0264463
· Iglesias, F. H., Celada, C. A., Navarro, C. B., Morales, L. P., Visus, N. A., Valverde, C. C., Dorado, V. M., Martínez Muñoz, M. L., Pueyo, C. B., Ramírez, E. L., Villaroel, R. M., Jordana, N. M., Bonet Simó, J. M., & SABCOMP group. (2018). Complex care needs in multiple chronic conditions: Population prevalence and characterization in primary care. A study protocol. International Journal of Integrated Care, 18(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.3292
Genomics
· McCarthy, M. I. (2017). Painting a new picture of personalised medicine for diabetes. Diabetologia, 60(5), 793–799. http://dx.doi.org.library.capella.edu/10.1007/s00125-017-4210-x
Pathophysiology
· Ford, S. H., Hodges, E., Thoyre, S., Baker, M., & Bartlett, R. (2021). Can understanding gut-brain axis biopsychosocial pathways improve clinical reasoning? The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 17(10), 1208–1213.
· Gansevoort Ron, T., & Hilbrands, L. B. (2020). CKD is a key risk factor for COVID-19 mortality. Nature Reviews. Nephrology, 16(12), 705–706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41581-020-00349-4
Pharmacology
· Siafis, S., & Papazisis, G. (2018). Detecting a potential safety signal of antidepressants and type 2 diabetes: A pharmacovigilance‐pharmacodynamic study. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 84(10), 2405–2414. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13699
Access to Care
· Yearby, R. (2018). Racial disparities in health status and access to healthcare: The continuation of inequality in the United States due to structural racism . The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 77(3-4), 1113–1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12230
· Zegeye, B., El-Khatib, Z., Ameyaw, E. K., Seidu, A., Ahinkorah, B. O., Keetile, M., & Yaya, S. (2021). Breaking barriers to healthcare access: A multilevel analysis of individual- and community-level factors affecting women's access to healthcare services in Benin . International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 750. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020750
Technology
· Archibald, M. M., & Barnard, A. (2018;2017). Futurism in nursing: Technology, robotics and the fundamentals of care . Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(11–12), 2473–2480. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14081
· Ying, Y., Ji, Y., Kong, F., Chen, Q., Lv, Y., Hou, Y., Zhu, L., Miao, P., Yu, L., Li, L., Kuang, W., Jiang, L., Zhu, X., Liu, X., Xu, L., Mi, Y., Lou, Z., & Ruan, L. (2021). Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for psychological distress in older adults without cognitive impairment living in nursing homes during the COVID-19 pandemic: A feasibility study . Internet Interventions: The Application of Information Technology in Mental and Behavioural Health, 26, 100461–100461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2021.100461
Policy
· Blendon, R. J., Benson, J. M., & Schneider, E. C. (2021). The future of health policy in a partisan United States: Insights from public opinion polls . JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 325(13), 1253–1254. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.1147
· Buerhaus, P. I. (2020). Demystifying national healthcare reform proposals: Implications for nurses . Nursing Economic$, 38(2), 58–64
· Franckle, R. L., Polacsek, M., Bleich, S. N., Thorndike, A. N., Findling, M. T. G., Moran, A. J., & Rimm, E. B. (2019). Support for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) policy alternatives among US adults, 2018 . American Journal of Public Health, 109(7), 993–995. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305112
· Park, J., Erikson, C., Han, X., & Iyer, P. (2018). Are state telehealth policies associated with the use of telehealth services among underserved populations? Health Affairs, 37(12), 2060–2068. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05101
· Silveira Silva, L., Gonçalves Nitschke, R., Machado Verdi, M. I., Dutra Tholl, A., Moura Lanza, F., Peres de Oliveira, P., & da Fonseca Viegas, S. M. (2022). Being ethical and bioethical in daily life of primary health care: nurses’ perceptions . Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 75(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0093
Assess2.docx
Develop a 2-4 page policy proposal that seeks to improve the outcomes for your chosen health care issue and target population.
Collapse All
Introduction
Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.
Cost and access to care continue to be main concerns for patients and providers. As technology improves our ability to care for and improve outcomes in patients with chronic and complex illnesses, questions of cost and access become increasingly important. As a master’s-prepared nurse, you must be able to develop policies that will ensure the delivery of care that is effective and can be provided in an ethical and equitable manner.
As a master's-prepared nurse, you have a valuable viewpoint and voice with which to advocate for policy developments. As a nurse leader and health care practitioner, often on the front lines of helping individuals and populations, you are able to articulate and advocate for the patient more than any other professional group in health care. This is especially true of populations that may be underserved, underrepresented, or are otherwise lacking a voice. By advocating for and developing policies, you are able to help drive improvements in outcomes for specific populations. The policies you advocate for could be internal ones (just within a specific department or health care setting) that ensure quality care and compliance. Or they could be external policies (local, state, or federal) that may have more wide-ranging effects on best practices and regulations.
Professional Context
As a master's-prepared nurse, you have a valuable viewpoint and voice with which to advocate for policy developments. As a nurse leader and health care practitioner, often on the front lines of helping individuals and populations, you are able to articulate and advocate for the patient more than any other professional group in health care. This is especially true of populations that may be underserved, underrepresented, or are otherwise lacking a voice. By advocating for and developing policies, you are able to help drive improvements in outcomes for specific populations. The policies you advocate for could be internal ones (just within a specific department or health care setting) that ensure quality care and compliance. Or they could be external policies (local, state, or federal) that may have more wide-ranging effects on best practices and regulations.
Scenario
The analysis of position papers that your interprofessional team presented to the committee has convinced them that it would be worth the time and effort to develop a new policy to address your specific issue in the target population. To that end, your interprofessional team has been asked to submit a policy proposal that outlines a specific approach to improving the outcomes for your target population. This proposal should be supported by evidence and best practices that illustrate why the specific approaches are likely to be successful. Additionally, you have been asked to address the ways in which applying your policy to interprofessional teams could lead to efficiency or effectiveness gains.
This assessment will build upon your previous Analysis of Position Papers for Vulnerable Populations assessment. If, for some reason, you wish to change your specific issue or target population, contact your faculty for approval.
Instructions
For this assessment, you will develop a policy proposal that seeks to improve the outcomes for your chosen health care issue and target population. The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your assessment submission addresses all of them. You may also want to read the Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal Scoring Guide and Guiding Questions: Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal [DOC] Download Guiding Questions: Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal [DOC] to better understand how each grading criterion will be assessed.
· Propose a policy and guidelines that will lead to improved outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
· Advocate the need for a proposed policy in the context of current outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
· Analyze the potential for an interprofessional approach to implementing a proposed policy to increase the efficiency or effectiveness of the care setting to achieve high-quality outcomes.
· Communicate proposal in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
· Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Example assessment: You may use the Assessment 2 Example [PDF] Download Assessment 2 Example [PDF] to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.
Submission Requirements
· Length of proposal: 2–4 double-spaced, typed pages, not including title page or reference list. Your proposal should be succinct yet substantive. No abstract is required.
· Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support the relevance of or need for your policy, as well as interprofessional considerations. Resources should be no more than five years old.
· APA formatting: Use the APA Style Paper Template [DOCX] . An APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] is also provided to help you in writing and formatting your proposal.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
· Competency 1: Design evidence-based advanced nursing care for achieving high-quality population outcomes.
· Propose a policy and guidelines that will lead to improved outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
· Competency 2: Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of interprofessional interventions in achieving desired population health outcomes.
· Analyze the potential for an interprofessional approach to implementing a proposed policy to increase the efficiency or effectiveness of the care setting to achieve high-quality outcomes.
· Competency 3: Analyze population health outcomes in terms of their implications for health policy advocacy.
· Advocate the need for a proposed policy in the context of current outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
· Competency 4: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
· Communicate in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
· Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.