quick check 5
nteasleyplease follow all directions
3 years ago
5
files (3)quickCheck.docx
quickCheck.docx
ModuleFiveProjectPreparationGuidelinesandRubric-IHP-604-Q1480HealthcareQualityImprovement23TW1.pdf
quickCheck.docx
2
IHP 604 Module Three Project Preparation Quick Check
Precious Teasley
Southern New Hampshire University
IHP-604-Q1480 Healthcare Quality Improvement 23TW1
Professor Barbara Brophy
September 29th, 2023
IHP 604 Module Three Project Preparation
Healthcare Organization
The healthcare organisation chosen is Mass General Brigham. Mass General Brigham is in the state of Massachusetts in Boston and is considered the biggest healthcare facility based on the number of employees. The hospital has more than 74,000 employees working as physicians, nurses, support staff, researchers, and carers (Mass General Brigham, 2023). The healthcare institutions under Mass General Brigham like the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) have also excelled, as they are the largest private hospitals in the US to receive money from the National Institutes of Health. The Mass General Brigham institutions maintain a combined research budget of more than $1.7 billion (Mass General Brigham, 2023). The healthcare institution has more than 200 residency and fellowship programmes, making it one of the most extensive and competitive medical education programmes in the nation. Medical students and residents often rotate between academic medical centers, community hospitals, and specialty hospitals.
Public-facing data
The healthcare institution has in the past shown its desire to work with communities surrounding the hospital. In its 2022 community assessment report, the institution highlighted various challenges facing surrounding communities, like mental health and drug misuse. The community assessment report for 2022 has the information that will be needed for the project to establish a clear quality improvement initiative.
Why the Organisation and Public Facing Data
The choice of the organisation is based on its size, the expenditure that goes towards research, and its work with communities. Previous work with communities for the organisation has been successful, with the organisation initiating projects that have helped the communities. The public-facing data is readily available on the internet and on the organization’s website. This makes it easier to access the data that will be effective for the project.
References
Mass General Brigham. (2023). About Mass General Brigham. retrieved from https://innovation.massgeneralbrigham.org/about/about-mass-general-brigham
Mass General Hospital. (2022). Community Health Needs Assessment Report 2022. Retrieved from https://www.massgeneral.org/assets/mgh/pdf/community-health/cchi/2022_chna_rreport.pdf
quickCheck.docx
2
IHP 604 Module Three Project Preparation Quick Check
Precious Teasley
Southern New Hampshire University
IHP-604-Q1480 Healthcare Quality Improvement 23TW1
Professor Barbara Brophy
September 29th, 2023
IHP 604 Module Three Project Preparation
Healthcare Organization
The healthcare organisation chosen is Mass General Brigham. Mass General Brigham is in the state of Massachusetts in Boston and is considered the biggest healthcare facility based on the number of employees. The hospital has more than 74,000 employees working as physicians, nurses, support staff, researchers, and carers (Mass General Brigham, 2023). The healthcare institutions under Mass General Brigham like the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) have also excelled, as they are the largest private hospitals in the US to receive money from the National Institutes of Health. The Mass General Brigham institutions maintain a combined research budget of more than $1.7 billion (Mass General Brigham, 2023). The healthcare institution has more than 200 residency and fellowship programmes, making it one of the most extensive and competitive medical education programmes in the nation. Medical students and residents often rotate between academic medical centers, community hospitals, and specialty hospitals.
Public-facing data
The healthcare institution has in the past shown its desire to work with communities surrounding the hospital. In its 2022 community assessment report, the institution highlighted various challenges facing surrounding communities, like mental health and drug misuse. The community assessment report for 2022 has the information that will be needed for the project to establish a clear quality improvement initiative.
Why the Organisation and Public Facing Data
The choice of the organisation is based on its size, the expenditure that goes towards research, and its work with communities. Previous work with communities for the organisation has been successful, with the organisation initiating projects that have helped the communities. The public-facing data is readily available on the internet and on the organization’s website. This makes it easier to access the data that will be effective for the project.
References
Mass General Brigham. (2023). About Mass General Brigham. retrieved from https://innovation.massgeneralbrigham.org/about/about-mass-general-brigham
Mass General Hospital. (2022). Community Health Needs Assessment Report 2022. Retrieved from https://www.massgeneral.org/assets/mgh/pdf/community-health/cchi/2022_chna_rreport.pdf
ModuleFiveProjectPreparationGuidelinesandRubric-IHP-604-Q1480HealthcareQualityImprovement23TW1.pdf
IHP 604 Module Five Project Preparation Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
For your course project, you will be creating a healthcare quality improvement initiative in which you will describe the issue at the outset, the setting, the problem to be solved, the parties
affected, and the importance of addressing the issue. You will recommend a concise implementation plan and describe in detail how you plan to evaluate if your implementation was successful.
The �rst step to completing your course project is to select a healthcare organization that releases public-facing data. In Module Three, you selected an organization and identi�ed a publicly
available set of data. For this assignment, you will need to choose an area that needs to be improved, a way to improve it, and a framework to utilize in your quality improvement initiative. You
may change your selection of the initiative or the framework in your �nal project submission, which is due in Module Nine. This assignment helps you focus on this aspect of the �nal project
and also maps to the second learning objective of this module.
Prompt
Speci�cally, you must address the following rubric criteria:
1. Selection of area of improvement: Describe an area of improvement related to your previously selected healthcare organization and its public-facing data that you will utilize for your
course project.
2. Selection of method of improvement: Describe the method of improvement that you will utilize in your course project.
3. Selection of framework to use in improvement initiative: Identify which of the four problem-solving frameworks (tracers, root cause analyses [RCA], failure mode effect analysis [FMEA]
studies, or plan-do-study-act [PDSA]) you will utilize for your course project by applying it to your improvement initiative.
4. Discuss your selections: Discuss why you selected the area of improvement, method of improvement, and framework.
5. Report sections: Describe the report sections you will include in your course project to describe your healthcare quality improvement initiative in a compelling and informative way.
Throughout your paper, provide speci�c evidence from at least two scholarly sources.
What to Submit
Submit this assignment as a 1-page Microsoft Word document. You should cite at least two sources. Sources should be cited according to APA style. You must also include an APA-style title
page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. If you need writing support, you can access the Online Writing Center through the Academic Support module
of your course.
Module Five Project Preparation Rubric
Criteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Selection of Area of
Improvement
Exceeds pro�ciency in an
exceptionally clear and
insightful manner, using
industry-speci�c language
Describes area of improvement
related to previously selected
healthcare organization and its
public-facing data that will be
utilized for the course project
Shows progress toward
pro�ciency, but with errors or
omissions
Does not attempt criterion 15
Selection of Method of
Improvement
Exceeds pro�ciency in an
exceptionally clear and
insightful manner, using
industry-speci�c language
Describes method of
improvement that will be
utilized in the course project
Shows progress toward
pro�ciency, but with errors or
omissions
Does not attempt criterion 15
Selection of Framework to
Use in Improvement
Initiative
Exceeds pro�ciency in an
exceptionally clear and
insightful manner, using
industry-speci�c language
Identi�es which of the four
problem-solving frameworks
[tracers, root cause analyses
(RCA), failure mode effect
analysis (FMEA) studies, or
plan-do-study-act (PDSA)] will
be utilized in the course project
by applying it to the
improvement initiative
Shows progress toward
pro�ciency, but with errors or
omissions
Does not attempt criterion 15
Discuss Selections Exceeds pro�ciency in an
exceptionally clear and
insightful manner, using
industry-speci�c language
Discusses why area of
improvement, method of
improvement, and framework
were selected, and how a
healthcare quality
improvement initiative report
that is cogent and informative
for the course project is being
developed
Shows progress toward
pro�ciency, but with errors or
omissions
Does not attempt criterion 15
Report Sections Exceeds pro�ciency in an
exceptionally clear and
insightful manner, using
industry-speci�c language
Describes report sections to be
included in course project to
describe healthcare quality
improvement initiative in a
compelling and informative way
Shows progress toward
pro�ciency, but with errors or
omissions
Does not attempt criterion 15
Criteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Articulation of Response Exceeds pro�ciency in an
exceptionally clear and
insightful manner
Clearly conveys meaning with
correct grammar, sentence
structure, and spelling,
demonstrating an
understanding of audience and
purpose
Shows progress toward
pro�ciency, but with errors in
grammar, sentence structure,
and spelling, negatively
impacting readability
Submission has critical errors in
grammar, sentence structure,
and spelling, preventing
understanding of ideas
15
Scholarly Sources Incorporates more than two
scholarly, current (within the
last �ve years) sources, or use
of sources is exceptionally
insightful
Incorporates two scholarly,
current (within the last �ve
years) sources that support
claims
Incorporates fewer than two
scholarly, current (within the
last �ve years) sources, or not
all sources support claims
Does not incorporate sources 5
APA Style Formats in-text citations and
reference list according to APA
style with no errors
Formats in-text citations and
reference list according to APA
style with fewer than �ve
errors
Formats in-text citations and
reference list according to APA
style with �ve or more errors
Does not format in-text
citations and reference list
according to APA style
5
Total: 100%
- FIN 534 Homework Set #4
- "GE Citizenship Case Study"
- BSHS 332 Week 3 Individual Assignment Update on Agency Visit Paper
- PROF XAVIER - Competitive Advantages Paper
- READ SHORT STORY, ANSWER 6 QUESTIONS - IN 2 HOURS TUTOR FLAKED!!!
- Pavlov's and Skinner's theories
- Crisis Speech
- Exicutive memo to the board
- Help with a java program problem
- The Application paper 5
