Question

3. A paralegal, an attorney, a witness, and opposing counsel are present for a deposition.

This is a violation of discovery rules because A. the deposition is conducted without opposing counsel

being present.

B. an officer of the court must be present to take the

deposition testimony.

C. a paralegal isn't allowed to be present for a deposition.

D. a judge must be present to settle evidence objections

during the deposition.

Question 4 of 20 : Select the best answer for

the question.

4. An attorney for a party requests discovery information. The other party claims that the information wouldn't be admissible at trial and refuses to provide the evidence. Which one of the following arguments can the attorney requesting the information use to get the other party to disclose? The attorney can claim that A. the party is required to disclose the information under the Freedom of Information Act.

B. the information doesn't have to be admissible if it's likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. C. there are no requirements for admissibility during discovery, only at trial.

D. admissibility is a factor only when the information is relevant.

Question 5 of 20 : Select the best answer

for the question.

5. A court limits discovery because it's unreasonably cumulative and obtainable from another source that's more convenient. This would be an example of which type of discovery exception?

A. Unduly burdensome discovery B. Experts employed in anticipation of litigation C. Physician-patient privilege D. Trade secrets