QSO 321 Module Two Journal Guidelines and Rubric

profilemsmeka291

Attached 

  • 4 months ago
  • 20
files (1)

QSO321ModuleTwoJournalGuidelinesandRubric.html.zip

QSO 321 Module Two Journal Guidelines and Rubric.html

QSO 321 Module Two Journal Guidelines and Rubric

Overview

In Module Two, you learned about the ways organizations support their people, whether it be within the workplace or the local community. For this journal entry, you will evaluate business practices that are not considerate of employees and communities, brainstorm reasons why the practices may have been established, and consider how they can be improved.

Directions

For this journal, select and evaluate one of the following practices:

  • Employee pay is low.
  • Employee training is limited.
  • Employee benefits are minimal; there is little paid time off or sick time available.
  • Employees describe the workplace culture as stressful, competitive, or alienating.
  • A business does not give back to the local community in any way.
  • A business outsources many of its suppliers, even though many local suppliers are available.

Then evaluate your selected practice by addressing the following rubric criteria:

  • General Factors: Describe general factors that may have contributed to an organization or business implementing this practice.
  • Potential Negative Repercussions: Identify potential negative repercussions of the practice on employees, the local community, or the business or organization.
  • Benefits: Explain benefits for employees, the local community, or the business or organization experience that might occur if a more people-friendly practice were incorporated.

What to Submit

Submit your assignment as a Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.

AI Usage

If you use gen AI tools to support your work on this assignment, be sure to follow these AI usage guidelines. You must acknowledge your use of these tools in your work. Guidelines on how to cite AI tools can be found in this Shapiro Library guide.

Module Two Journal Rubric

Criteria Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Partially Meets Expectations Does Not Meet Expectations Value
General Factors Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner by providing examples of general factors contributing to an organization or business implementing the selected practice Describes general factors that may have contributed to an organization or business implementing the selected practice Describes some general factors with limited relevant personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process Does not attempt to describe general factors 25
Potential Negative Repercussions Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner by providing examples of repercussions associated with applying the practice Identifies potential negative repercussions of the practice on employees, the local community, or the business or organization Shows limited depth of knowledge, indicating a need to explore the module’s content further Does not attempt to identify potential negative repercussions, reflecting that the module’s content was not read 25
Benefits Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner by providing examples of benefits that were produced by incorporating more people-friendly practices Explains benefits for employees, the local community, or the business or organization experience that might occur if a more people-friendly practice were incorporated Explains some benefits with limited detail, demonstrating limited incorporation of the module’s content Does not attempt to explain the benefits 25
Clear Communication Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understanding Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication 25
Total: 100%