Q1 WK5 2023

HSE 400 Critical Thinking

Week 5

Listed below are topics I would like you to discuss. Refer to the textbook, weekly materials when researching the topics for this Discussion Forum.  Put your writing into your own words, do not copy directly from the source. Lastly, review how to paraphrase and quote resources before you begin posting.

In the essence of secession discussed in chapter 5 and using information about critical thinking learned in chapter 2, complete the following exercise concerning hate crimes.

Think of a recent article or current event where a state has mentioned seceding from the United States. The textbook is also an option to use for guidance.

· What caused the discussion to secede?

· What are the political consequences or advantages for both conservatives and liberals?

· Explain what the outside influences might have been for the discussion of secession.

· In your opinion, do states have the right to secede and are there national security consequences to secession? Justify your stance.

This exercise should be at  least 250 words. This is not a research paper exercise. This is a critical thinking exercise. Use your own thinking to write up the exercise.

The following optional learning resources contain approved external websites that may be used to assist you in gaining a deeper understanding of the material presented in this weeks lesson. They are categorized by the student learning objectives in this week. Please take advantage of this opportunity to expand your knowledge with the material provided. 

Laguardia, F. (2020).  Vol 114, No. 4 Online Essay: Considering a Domestic Terrorism Statute and Its Alternatives. Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Scholarly Commons. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1403&context=nulr. 

Click  https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1403&context=nulr link to open resource.

How the USA PATRIOT Act redefines "Domestic Terrorism". American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). (n.d.). https://www.aclu.org/other/how-usa-patriot-act-redefines-domestic-terrorism. 

Click  https://www.aclu.org/other/how-usa-patriot-act-redefines-domestic-terrorism link to open resource.

Domestic Terrorism and the Attack on the US Capitol. Congressional Research Service (CRS). (2021, January 13). https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN11573. 

Click  https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN11573 link to open resource.

HSE 350

Week 5 Essay: Rough Draft

This week, your draft of this paper is due. Your paper should be  8-10 pages in length. At least  4 references should be used to support your main points.  Quoted material should be avoided. Instead, please provide paraphrased research to support your main points that are accompanied with in-text references.

Be sure to follow APA formatting guidelines. Your paper should contain section headings. Ensure that you provide a full overview of the topic that you selected. Your paper should reflect the amount of research that you conducted to learn everything possible about this topic. Please see HSE350WEEK4ESSAY ATTACHED

Wk Draft Paper Rubric

Draft/Final Paper Rubric (100 points):

Criteria	15 points	20 points
Word Count and Title Page	Conforms to word count (800-899 words in the body of the essay). Title page may or may not be included.	Conforms to word count (900-1000 words in the body of the essay). Title page included.
Introduction and Conclusion	Introduction mostly previews subject and expected outcome; conclusion mostly reviews subject and comes to a logical conclusion.	Introduction previews subject and expected outcome. Conclusion reviews subject and comes to a logical conclusion.
Content	Mostly describes the selected issue/topic and relative theories pertaining to selected issue/topic.	Thoroughly describes the selected issue/topic and discusses relative theories pertaining to selected issue/topic
In-Text Citations and References	In-text citations are used in essay showing all 3 primary/scholarly sources cited. References page included with most of the sources cited properly.	In-text citations are used in essay showing all 4 primary/scholarly sources cited. References page cites all 4 sources properly.
APA Format and Grammar	APA format applied mostly correct in both in-text citations and references and/or hardly any major grammatical errors throughout.	APA format correctly applied in both in-text citations and references. No major grammatical errors throughout.

HSE 350

Week 5 Essay: Rough Draft

Your rough draft is due this week.  Build upon your Week 2, Week 3, and Week 4 assignments.  From the topic you selected in Week 2, you will complete your rough draft. Your paper should be  8-10 pages  in length. At  least  4 references  should be used to support your main points.  Quoted material should be avoided.  Instead, please provide paraphrased research to support your main points that are accompanied with in-text references. Please see HSE400WEEK4ESSAY ATTACHED

Be sure to follow  APA formatting guidelines. Your paper should contain  section headings. Ensure that you provide a full overview of the topic that you selected. Your paper should reflect the amount of research that you conducted to learn everything possible about this topic.

Wk 5 & 7 Draft/Final Paper Rubric

Draft/Final Paper Rubric (100 points):

Criteria	15 points	20 points
Word Count and Title Page	Conforms to word count (800-899 words in the body of the essay). Title page may or may not be included.	Conforms to word count (900-1000 words in the body of the essay). Title page included.
Introduction and Conclusion	Introduction mostly previews subject and expected outcome; conclusion mostly reviews subject and comes to a logical conclusion.	Introduction previews subject and expected outcome. Conclusion reviews subject and comes to a logical conclusion.
Content	Mostly describes the selected issue/topic and relative theories pertaining to selected issue/topic.	Thoroughly describes the selected issue/topic and discusses relative theories pertaining to selected issue/topic
In-Text Citations and References	In-text citations are used in essay showing all 3 primary/scholarly sources cited. References page included with most of the sources cited properly.	In-text citations are used in essay showing all 4 primary/scholarly sources cited. References page cites all 4 sources properly.
APA Format and Grammar	APA format applied mostly correct in both in-text citations and references and/or hardly any major grammatical errors throughout.	APA format correctly applied in both in-text citations and references. No major grammatical errors throughout.

2

HSE 400 Week 4 Essay

Student’s Name

Institutional Affiliation

Course Name

Instructor’s Name

Date

Captured Individual Who Has Filed a Lawsuit Against the Government for Wrongful Detention Introduction

The legal ramifications of illegal detention have attracted attention in recent years. People who believe they were wrongfully detained by the government regularly sue the agencies responsible. This study explores the fascinating and challenging topic of government detainee litigation. Wrongful detention occurs when the government wrongfully holds someone. Mistaken identification, administrative errors, or government agent misbehavior can cause this. Wrongful detention can cause personal freedom, reputation damage, emotional pain, and financial hardship. This study examines the legal and ethical issues in wrongful detention lawsuits against the government. We'll analyze the causes, plaintiffs' challenges, the government's defense, and case results. We will also examine how these lawsuits affect government accountability and individual rights.

Outline

I. Introduction

· Definition and significance of wrongful detention cases against the government

II. Reasons for Lawsuits

· Mistaken identity and errors in the justice system

· Allegations of misconduct by government agents

· Seeking accountability and justice

III. Challenges Faced by Plaintiffs

· Burden of proving wrongful detention

· Government immunity and legal obstacles

· Psychological and emotional toll on plaintiffs

IV. Government Defense Strategies

· Legal justifications for detention

· Immunity claims and qualified immunity

· Settlement negotiations

V. Outcomes of Lawsuits

· Successful cases and compensation

· Dismissals and lack of accountability

· Impact on government policies and practices

VI. Broader Implications

· Government accountability and transparency

· Protection of individual rights and civil liberties

· Potential reforms in the criminal justice system

Closing

In conclusion, wrongful detention actions against the government are complicated. Legal conflicts show the delicate balance between national security, individual rights, and government accountability. Some plaintiffs receive justice and recompense, but others struggle to hold accountable.

Bibliography

Butler, J. (2020). Indefinite Detention. Qui Parle, 29(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1215/10418385-8241890

Butler (2020) thoroughly examines indefinite detention's legal and ethical issues in this thought-provoking article. The author discusses the national security risks of holding people without a defined endpoint. This article sheds light on government unjust detention cases by addressing core civil liberties and government authority issues. Butler's detailed research highlights the conflict between national security and due process and individual rights. The article challenges the premise of indefinite detention using a multitude of legal precedents and ethical frameworks to explain its effects. Butler's work also emphasizes the necessity for a sophisticated strategy that balances national security and justice, stimulating important discussions about how to achieve a just society.

Davis, A. J. (2019). Reimagining Prosecution: A Growing Progressive Movement. UCLA Criminal Justice Law Review, 3(1). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2rq8t137

From criminal justice reform through prosecution, Davis (2019) provides a complete critique. While not directly about wrongful detention cases, this article examines legal system changes that may affect them. It covers the progressive movement's impact on prosecution techniques and the necessity for a fair and reasonable legal process, which is important for those challenging the government for wrongful detention. Davis discusses how these changes in prosecution techniques can boost justice system scrutiny and accountability, potentially lowering wrongful detention. This examination shows how the criminal justice system's components affect justice and individual rights.

Green, B. (2022). The flaws of policies requiring human oversight of government algorithms. Computer Law & Security Review, 45, 105681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105681

Green (2022) provides a fresh perspective on algorithms in government decision-making, particularly in detention and security matters. It covers the risks of using algorithms in such situations, but not in government cases. Understanding the limitations of automated decision-making systems is essential to assessing the government's detention reasons, making this essay a significant addition to the conversation on unlawful detention and government transparency and accountability.

Uzoma, I. (2023, May 18). Rethinking US Foreign Policy Strategy on Wrongful Detention. Policycommons.net; New York University. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/3817614/rethinking-us-foreign-policy-strategy-on-wrongful-detention/4623531/

Uzoma (2023) suggests reassessing the US' wrongful detention foreign policy. This Policycommons.net and New York University policy research examines the intricacies and repercussions of unlawful detentions in U.S. international relations. The author suggests rethinking diplomatic techniques and using sanctions and dialogue to address this vital issue. Readers learn about wrongful detentions and how foreign policy might better safeguard the rights and well-being of those detained overseas by reading the article.

References

Butler, J. (2020). Indefinite Detention. Qui Parle, 29(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1215/10418385-8241890

Davis, A. J. (2019). Reimagining Prosecution: A Growing Progressive Movement. UCLA Criminal Justice Law Review, 3(1). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2rq8t137

Green, B. (2022). The flaws of policies requiring human oversight of government algorithms. Computer Law & Security Review, 45, 105681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105681

Uzoma, I. (2023, May 18). Rethinking US Foreign Policy Strategy on Wrongful Detention. Policycommons.net; New York University. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/3817614/rethinking-us-foreign-policy-strategy-on-wrongful-detention/4623531/

HSE 301 WEEK 5 DISCUSSION FORUM

Post your response to the following information and come up with a consensus.

Review the scenario presented below.

1. Identify which command staff positions would be assigned.

1. Next, if you were the incident commander, what specific activities would you delegate to each command staff member?

Scenario: An unexpected flash flood has struck a small community. As a result:

1. Homes, schools, the business district and the community college are being evacuated.

1. Damage to critical infrastructure includes contamination of the water supply, downed power lines, and damaged roads.

2. Perimeter control and security in the business district are needed.

3. Mutual aid is arriving from several surrounding communities.

4. Media representatives are arriving at the scene.

SEE ATTACHEMENTS:

NASP PREPaRE School ICS Roles and Responsibilities_0

ICS - Unit 3

ISC 100 Student Manual - Lesson 3

Command Staff Overview Transcript

You’ve now learned that the Incident Commander has overall authority and responsibility for conducting incident operations. An Incident Commander may assign staff to assist with managing the incident.

The Command Staff consists of the Public Information Officer, Safety Officer, and Liaison Officer, who all report directly to the Incident Commander.

Let’s look at the roles of each member of the Command Staff. The Public Information Officer serves as the conduit for information to internal and external stakeholders, including the media and the public.

Accurate information is essential. The Public Information Officer serves as the primary contact for anyone who wants information about the incident and the response to it.

Another member of the Command Staff is the Safety Officer, who monitors conditions and develops measures for assuring the safety of all personnel.

The Safety Officer is responsible for advising the Incident Commander on issues regarding incident safety, conducting risk analyses, and implementing safety measures.

The final member of the Command Staff is the Liaison Officer, who serves as the primary contact for supporting agencies assisting at an incident.

Additionally, the Liaison Officer responds to requests from incident personnel for contacts among the assisting and cooperating agencies, and monitors incident operations in order to identify any current or potential problems between response agencies.

A Command Staff may not be necessary at every incident, but every incident requires that certain management functions be performed. An effective Command Staff frees the Incident Commander to assume a leadership role.