Psychology Discussion/Assignment/Project
YoyobabaPlease read the instructions and No AI or ChatGPT
2 months ago
1
files (2)Topic_Week1_Discussion9.pdf
Week1_Assignment12.pdf
Topic_Week1_Discussion9.pdf
p g g y g g stick or are you dangling a carrot? In other words, is what you are saying or doing forceful or enticing? Awareness of everyday use of influence, and understanding characteristics of different forms of social influence, are important for maintaining standards of behavior in both personal and professional interactions.
For this Discussion, you will recall a time when you influenced another adult’s thoughts or actions in a positive way. You will analyze and evaluate the aspects of influence you employed.
To prepare:
Review Chapters 1 and 2 of the text. Pay particular attention to the meaning and differences between persuasion and coercion , propaganda , and manipulation . Recall a situation when you influenced another adult in a positive way (e.g., addressed negative or harmful thinking or behavior). Reflect on the language and/or actions you used to influence the other adult and which aspect of social influence (i.e., persuasion, coercion, propaganda, or manipulation), or a combination, most accurately characterizes your approach to the other adult. Consider to what degree you were aware of the type(s) of influence you were using and whether you would employ the same or different aspect(s) of social influence today.
Of Week 1 post responses to the following:
Describe the situation and the language and/or actions you used to influence the other adult. Explain the aspect(s) of social influence most evident in your language/actions, and to what degree you were aware of using persuasion, coercion, propaganda, and/or manipulation at the time. Explain the outcome and your degree of success in influencing the other adult. Based on what you know now, explain whether you would use the same aspect(s) of social influence with this adult today, or what type of influence you would employ instead, and give your reasoning.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834)
BY DAY 3
Week1_Assignment12.pdf
Due May 31 by 10:59pm Points 100 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2
Start Assignment
Back to Week at a Glance (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673801)
ANALYZING PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATIONS
Recall that your text defines persuasion as “an attempt to convince others to change their attitudes or behavior” (Perloff, 2023, p. 28). For the Discussion this week, you analyzed your own approach to influencing another person in a positive way. You also considered whether, based on your current understanding of different forms of persuasion, you are comfortable with the methods you used.
For your Assignment this week, you will continue to focus on approaches used to persuade by considering the ethics of persuasion and, particularly, techniques used by people in work situations. In evaluating specific interactions where someone influenced you (be sure you use adults as the influencer in this assignment), you will apply normative theories of ethics. Keep in mind that normative theories are the “ought to” ideas of what people ought to do based upon moral philosophy. Normative ethics involve the person’s character and how we judge them. Do we call them honest? Are they trustworthy?
For this Assignment, you will analyze the four scenarios you indicted in your chart when someone influenced you in your everyday communications with others.
To prepare:
Review the Week 1 Assignment Instructions handout from the Learning Resources. Use the Week 1 Assignment Template document from the Learning Resources to record the persuasive communications you encounter in a 24-hour period. Record four entries noting when another adult
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/modules/items/9673834)
tried to influence you. Write the narrative to address the prompts directly under the Chart. Review Chapters 1, 2, and 3 in the textbook; review also the codes of ethics that correlate most closely to your current work or the profession you want to enter. URLs for the codes of ethics are located in the Week 1 Learning Resources. This sample chart (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132?wrap=1) (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/224961/files/19481132/download?download_frd=1) provides guidance for the assignment. Select one organization’s code of ethics to use in evaluating the behavior of the person influencing you in each communication you record. For communications that are more personal than professional, identify specific guidelines within the code of ethics you chose that could logically be used to evaluate personal interactions. Reflect on the entries in your completed Chart. For each entry, consider what you were thinking at the time and how you felt. Were the strategies used by the influencer ethical?
Of Week 1 submit a 3- to 5-page paper that includes your completed chart, followed by your narrative that addresses the following.
Use a normative theory to analyze how each person tried to influence you. Give your reasoning for choosing this theory. Use a Standard/Principle from the professional code of ethics you have selected to evaluate each of the four required episodes from your chart as "ethical" or "unethical" when the person tried to influence you. Summarize insights you have gained about persuasive communication that you would apply to your current job or the future work you want to do.
Use the Assignment Template to record your chart and write your analysis directly under the Chart in a Word document. Be sure to rename the document following the instructions.
Although this Assignment has elements of a personal reflection, you must also demonstrate your understanding of the week’s topics. Be specific and provide examples.
Note: Support the information in your Assignment with evidence from the assigned Learning Resources, including in-text citations. Provide a reference list for all resources you use for this Assignment.
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
BY DAY 7
SUBMISSION INFORMATIO
PSYC_3007_Week1_Assignment_Rubric
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK1Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page. 3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Criteria Ratings Pts
Submit chart (20 points)
20 pts
Analyze by explaining the normative theory that best describes the persuader's intentions/behaviors (20 points)
20 pts
20 pts A
Response is complete and accurate; contains sufficient details and/or explanation; includes supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
17 pts B
Response is complete and mostly accurate; contains some details and/or explanation; includes supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
15 pts C
Response is somewhat complete and/or is somewhat inaccurate; and/or does not contain sufficient details and/or explanation; includes some supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
13 pts D
Response is incomplete or is mostly inaccurate; lacks sufficient details and/or explanation; does not include supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
0 pts F
Response is incomplete; answers are inaccurate and/or not explained; no supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
20 pts A Response is complete and accurate; contains sufficient details and/or explanation; includes supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
17 pts B Response is complete and mostly accurate; contains some details and/or explanation; includes supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
15 pts C Response is somewhat complete and/or is somewhat inaccurate; and/or does not contain sufficient details and/or explanation; includes some supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
13 pts D Response is incomplete or is mostly inaccurate; lacks sufficient details and/or explanation; does not include supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
0 pts F Response is incomplete; answers are inaccurate and/or not explained; no supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
Criteria Ratings Pts
Apply the professional code of ethics to how the persuader influenced you (20 points)
20 pts
Summarize insights about persuasive communication related to work situations (20 points)
20 pts
20 pts A
Response is complete and accurate; contains sufficient details and/or explanation; includes supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
17 pts B
Response is complete and mostly accurate; contains some details and/or explanation; includes supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
15 pts C
Response is somewhat complete and/or is somewhat inaccurate; and/or does not contain sufficient details and/or explanation; includes some supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
13 pts D
Response is incomplete or is mostly inaccurate; lacks sufficient details and/or explanation; does not include supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
0 pts F
Response is incomplete; answers are inaccurate and/or not explained; no supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
20 pts A Response is complete and accurate; contains sufficient details and/or explanation; includes supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
17 pts B Response is complete and mostly accurate; contains some details and/or explanation; includes supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
15 pts C Response is somewhat complete and/or is somewhat inaccurate; and/or does not contain sufficient details and/or explanation; includes some supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
13 pts D Response is incomplete or is mostly inaccurate; lacks sufficient details and/or explanation; does not include supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
0 pts F Response is incomplete; answers are inaccurate and/or not explained; no supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
Criteria Ratings Pts
Quality of Writing (15 points)
15 pts
Information documentation (5 points)
5 pts
Total Points: 100
15 pts A
Writing is clear and organized with few or no errors in mechanics, usage, grammar, or spelling (MUGS). There is a preponderance of original writing (i.e., use of own words and proper paraphrasing).
12 pts B
Writing is mostly clear and organized with few MUGS errors. Writing is original (i.e., use of own words and proper paraphrasing).
10.5 pts C
Writing is somewhat clear and organized with some MUGS errors. Most writing is original (i.e., use of own words and proper paraphrasing).
9 pts D
Writing is somewhat unclear and disorganized and/or contains many MUGS errors. There is an overuse of direct quotations and/or ineffective paraphrasing.
0 pts F
Writing is unclear and/or disorganized and/or contains many MUGS errors. There is an underuse of original writing and an overuse of directly quoted content.
5 pts A Information from the Learning Resources is properly documented with citation(s) and reference(s) in correct APA style.
3.5 pts B Information from the Learning Resources is partially documented with citation(s) and/or reference(s), and / or does not follow correct APA style.
0 pts C Information from the Learning Resources is not cited or referenced in any way.
0 pts D
0 pts F
- Healing Hands Hospital is preparing
- Paper and presentation
- personal strategic plan
- Case Assignment 4
- Math Expert Only
- Calculations Shown
- Omar Haaris
- QNT 561
- ECO 372 Week 2 Learning Team Weekly Reflection - Economic Forecasting Paper
- HRM 531 Week 4 Individual Assignment Career Development Plan Part III Performance and Career Management.
