Psychology Assignment
Please follow the instructions , No Ai Or chatsgpt
5 months ago
1
Week3_Assignment10.pdf
Week3_Assignment9.pdf
Week3_Assignment10.pdf
Due Sunday by 10:59pm Points 90 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2
Start Assignment
Back to Week at a Glance (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/205473/modules/items/8688368
PERCEPTIONS OF SOCIAL CLASS In Week 1, you considered the way that people perceive themselves in terms of social class. This week, you are examining how people perceive others in terms of social class. As a reminder, social class ranks people according to their importance in society. People may perceive different ranks of social class based on race, power, wealth, and other characteristics. Ranking people as low class, middle class, and high class is called stratification.
Some of the authors of the Readings in the course text suggest that the United States is developing a tri- racial stratification system which ties social class to race. According to these authors, a preliminary map of the tri-racial system identifies "whites" as high, "honorary whites" in the middle, and "collective black" as low. This stratification is based primarily on skin tone. Therefore, if you look white you will be perceived as high in the stratification. The darker your skin tone, the lower your rank in the stratification system.
In other Readings, the authors tie social class to power and wealth. People who are perceived as having a great deal of authority in their jobs are considered to be powerful. Powerful people hold a high rank in social class. Additionally, people who are financially well off are considered to be in a high rank because of their wealth. Perceptions of social class can be complex since they can be based on race, power, and wealth.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/205473/modules/items/8688380)
PSYC_3005_Week3_Assignment_Rubric
To prepare for this Assignment:
Review this week’s Learning Resources. Pay particular attention to the definitions of wealth, power, and the tri-racial stratification system in the article, “From Bi-racial to Tri-racial: Towards a New System of Racial Stratification in the USA.” Consider the impact of the tri-racial stratification system on perceptions of race and ethnicity. Think about how race, power, and wealth might influence people's perception of social class Reflect on whether race, power, or wealth might have the most influence and why.
The Assignment (3–4 pages):
Explain the impact of a tri-racial system on societal perceptions of race and ethnicity. Provide specific examples. Separately analyze the impact of race, power, and wealth on people's perceptions of social class. Provide specific examples for each. Explain which you believe has the greatest influence on people's perceptions of social class and justify your response.
Support your Assignment with specific references to all resources used in its preparation.
Submit your Assignment.
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK3Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page. 3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
BY DAY 7
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Criteria Ratings Pts
Explain the impact of a tri- racial system on societal perceptions of race and ethnicity with examples. (25 points)
25 pts
Analyze with examples the impact of race, power, and wealth on people's perceptions of social class. (25 points)
25 pts
25 pts A
Response is complete and accurate; contains sufficient details and/or explanation; includes supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
21 pts B
Response is complete and mostly accurate; contains some details and/or explanation; includes supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
17.5 pts C
Response is somewhat complete and/or is somewhat inaccurate; and/or does not contain sufficient details and/or explanation; includes some supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
15 pts D
Response is incomplete or is mostly inaccurate; lacks sufficient details and/or explanation; does not include supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
0 pts F
Response is incomplete; answers are inaccurate and/or not explained; no supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
25 pts A Response is complete and accurate; contains sufficient details and/or explanation; includes supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
21 pts B Response is complete and mostly accurate; contains some details and/or explanation; includes supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
17.5 pts C Response is somewhat complete and/or is somewhat inaccurate; and/or does not contain sufficient details and/or explanation; includes some supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
15 pts D Response is incomplete or is mostly inaccurate; lacks sufficient details and/or explanation; does not include supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
0 pts F Response is incomplete; answers are inaccurate and/or not explained; no supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
Criteria Ratings Pts
Explain and justify which you believe has the greatest influence on people's perceptions of social class. (20 points)
20 pts
Quality of Writing. (15 points)
15 pts
20 pts A
Response is complete and accurate; contains sufficient details and/or explanation; includes supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
17 pts B
Response is complete and mostly accurate; contains some details and/or explanation; includes supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
15 pts C
Response is somewhat complete and/or is somewhat inaccurate; and/or does not contain sufficient details and/or explanation; includes some supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
13 pts D
Response is incomplete or is mostly inaccurate; lacks sufficient details and/or explanation; does not include supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
0 pts F
Response is incomplete; answers are inaccurate and/or not explained; no supporting information from the Learning Resources when necessary.
15 pts A Writing is clear and organized with few or no errors in mechanics, usage, grammar, or spelling (MUGS). There is a preponderance of original writing (i.e., use of own words and proper paraphrasing).
12 pts B Writing is mostly clear and organized with few MUGS errors. Writing is original (i.e., use of own words and proper paraphrasing).
10.5 pts C Writing is somewhat clear and organized with some MUGS errors. Most writing is original (i.e., use of own words and proper paraphrasing).
9 pts D Writing is somewhat unclear and disorganized and/or contains many MUGS errors. There is an overuse of direct quotations and/or ineffective paraphrasing.
0 pts F Writing is unclear and/or disorganized and/or contains many MUGS errors. There is an underuse of original writing and an overuse of directly quoted content.
Criteria Ratings Pts
Information Documentation. (5 points)
5 pts
Total Points: 90
5 pts A
Information from the Learning Resources is properly documented with citation(s) and reference(s) in correct APA style.
3.5 pts C
Information from the Learning Resources is partially documented with citation(s) and/or reference(s), and / or does not follow correct APA style.
0 pts F
Information from the Learning Resources is not cited or referenced in any way.
Week3_Assignment9.pdf
Due Sunday by 10:59pm Points 95 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2
Start Assignment
Back to Week at a Glance (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/205594/modules/items/8688453
MEMORY
In this Assignment, you will take a closer look at how memories are encoded, stored, and retrieved – often with surprising gaps or distortions. By connecting real-life experiences to key cognitive psychology concepts, you will deepen your understanding of how memory works. Through this lens, the assignment highlights the fallibility of memory and the formation of false memories, which are essential for understanding how cognitive processes shape our daily life.
(https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/OrigImage- LgRendition/GettyLicense_611076268.jpg)
RESOURCES Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Review the following readings from this week’s Discussion:
Readings
Submit a 500- to 900-word paper in which you:
Describe a personal memory that you have, either from childhood or more recently, and reflect on how this memory was encoded, stored, and retrieved. Explain how encoding specificity and levels of processing relate to your memory. Be sure to provide specific details of how these processes occurred based on the processes noted in the Learning Resources this week. Explain how this assignment has changed your understanding of memory and introduced you to its limitations.
To demonstrate what you learned this week, be sure to support your work by referring to specific information from the learning resources. Cite and reference the sources you used.
Be sure to review the Week 3 Assignment Rubric to understand the specific grading criteria your Instructor will use to evaluate your work.
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for originality. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
Klein, C. (2023). Chapter 5: Long-term memory. (https://una.pressbooks.pub/essentials-cognitive- psychology/chapter/chapter-5-long-term-memory/) In Essentials of cognitive psychology. University of North Alabama Digital Press at Collier Library. https://una.pressbooks.pub/essentials-cognitive- psychology/chapter/chapter-5-long-term-memory/
Time Estimate: 19 minutes
McDermott, K.B. & Roediger, H.L. (2025). Memory (encoding, storage, retrieval). (https://nobaproject.com/modules/memory- encoding-storage-retrieval) In R. Biswas-Diener & E. Diener (Eds), Noba textbook series: Psychology. Champaign, IL: DEF publishers. https://nobaproject.com/modules/memory-encoding-storage-retrieval
Time Estimate: 33 minutes
BY DAY 7
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
PSYC_3001_Week3_Assignment_Rubric
To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment.
1. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page. 2. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Criteria Ratings Pts
Described a personal memory and reflected on how the memory was encoded, stored, and retrieved.
25 pts
Explained how encoding specificity and levels of processing relate to their memory. Provided specific details of how the processes occurred based on the Learning Resources.
20 pts
Explained how the assignment changed their understanding of memory and its limitations.
20 pts
Format and Writing
15 pts
25 to >23.0 pts Exemplary (Exceeds Expectations) This component is fully addressed and logically presented.
23 to >17.0 pts Proficient (Meets Expectations) This component is addressed. Further development would strengthen this component.
17 to >0 pts Developing (Does Not Fully Meet Expectations)
This component is not present or not clearly addressed.
20 to >18.0 pts Exemplary (Exceeds Expectations) This component is fully addressed and logically presented.
18 to >14.0 pts Proficient (Meets Expectations) This component is addressed. Further development would strengthen this component.
14 to >0 pts Developing (Does Not Fully Meet Expectations)
This component is not present or not clearly addressed.
20 to >18.0 pts Exemplary (Exceeds Expectations) This component is fully addressed and logically presented.
18 to >14.0 pts Proficient (Meets Expectations) This component is addressed. Further development would strengthen this component.
14 to >0 pts Developing (Does Not Fully Meet Expectations)
This component is not present or not clearly addressed.
15 to >13.0 pts Exemplary (Exceeds Expectations) Any spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation deviations from Standard Academic English are minor and do not affect clear communication. Work includes multiple
13 to >10.0 pts Proficient (Meets Expectations) Work contains few spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation deviations from Standard Academic English, OR these deviations do not affect clear
10 to >0 pts Developing (Does Not Fully Meet Expectations)
Multiple spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation deviations from Standard Academic English affect clear communication. Work
Criteria Ratings Pts
Timeliness
15 pts
Total Points: 95
explicit mentions of concepts or ideas from the required resources. Citations are included and mostly properly formatted. A reference section is included and mostly properly formatted.
communication. Work includes one or more explicit mentions of a concept or idea from the required sources. An attempt has been made to cite the source(s). A reference section is included but might contain some errors.
does not include any explicit mention of concepts or ideas from the required resources, OR it contains one or more explicit mention of a concept or idea from the required sources, but without attempting to cite the source. A reference section is not included.
15 to >13.0 pts Exemplary (Exceeds Expectations) The assignment was submitted on time unless there was a prior agreement with the instructor.
13 to >10.0 pts Proficient (Meets Expectations) The assignment was submitted within 7 days of the due date.
10 to >0 pts Developing (Does Not Fully Meet Expectations) The assignment was not submitted within 7 days of the due date.
- ethical and legal essay
- Lead-Disc10
- Please respond to the following:
- Prohect Scheduling
- PAPER
- ACC 291 Week 3 Summary
- What is the importance of exchange rates?
- LTC 315 Week 4 Individual Assignment Making Choices Guide Part II (A Guide to Help with Lifestyle Ch (1)
- OPS 571 WEEK 2 ASSIGNMENT Week 2 Process Design & Supply Chain Evaluation
- EXPERT_RESEARCHER