Psychology assignment

Rosi_226

Main

Home >Homework Answsers >Psychology homework help

No Plagiarism

3 years ago
02.10.2023
12

Report issue

files (2)

assignmentduein4hours.docx
UNV-103Rubric-Reflection_GCUCodeofConduct-Online.pdf

assignmentduein4hours.docx

Assessment Traits

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, using the attached APA Style template. https://halo.gcu.edu/resource/f9e45f90-d7e2-42a5-806a-98427a1eda3e

Reflect on the topic of GCU Code of Conduct and Academic Standards and in 400-500 words address the following prompts in four paragraphs:

1. Review the Code of Conduct and Academic Standards in the university policy handbook. Go to https://www.gcu.edu/academics/academic-policies.php#h-university-policy-handbook and click on the University Policy Handbook link. Find the Code of Conduct and Academic Standards section. In your own words, explain one academic integrity violation, other than plagiarism, and one code of conduct violation. Give a specific example of what the two identified violations could be and describe why these standards are in place.

2. The academic integrity section discusses academic dishonesty. One area of dishonesty is plagiarism. Define plagiarism in your own words and explain why you think students plagiarize?

3. Describe how students can avoid academic dishonesty in group work or as an individual?

4. How do you hold yourself and your peers accountable to the GCU Code of Conduct and Academic Integrity standards?

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

UNV-103Rubric-Reflection_GCUCodeofConduct-Online.pdf

Reflection: GCU Code of Conduct - Online - Rubric

Academic Integrity Violation 13 points

Criteria Description

Academic Integrity Violation

5. Target 13 points

Explanation and example of one academic integrity violation is thorough and

includes substantial explanation and relevant supporting details.

4. Acceptable 11.05 points

Explanation and example of one academic integrity violation is complete and

includes relevant details.

3. Approaching 9.75 points

Explanation and example of one academic integrity violation is provided but lacks

relevant detail.

2. Insufficient 8.45 points

Explanation and example of one academic integrity violation is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Code of Conduct Violation 13 points

Criteria Description

Code of Conduct Violation

5. Target 13 points

Explanation and example of one code of conduct violation is thorough and includes

substantial explanation and relevant supporting details.

4. Acceptable 11.05 points

Explanation and example of one code of conduct violation is complete and includes

relevant details.

Collapse All

3. Approaching 9.75 points

Explanation and example of one code of conduct violation is provided but lacks

relevant detail.

2. Insufficient 8.45 points

Explanation and example of one code of conduct violation is incomplete.

Plagiarism De�nition 6.5 points

Criteria Description

Plagiarism Definition

5. Target 6.5 points

Definition of plagiarism in own words is thorough and includes substantial

explanation and relevant supporting details.

4. Acceptable 5.52 points

Definition of plagiarism in own words is complete and includes relevant details.

3. Approaching 4.88 points

Definition of plagiarism in own words is provided but lacks relevant detail.

2. Insufficient 4.23 points

Definition of plagiarism in own words is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Definition of plagiarism in own words is not provided.

Plagiarism Rationale 6.5 points

Criteria Description

Plagiarism Rationale

5. Target 6.5 points

Reason for why students plagiarize is thorough and includes substantial

explanation and relevant supporting details.

4. Acceptable 5.52 points

Reason for why students plagiarize is complete and includes relevant details.

3. Approaching 4.88 points

Reason for why students plagiarize is provided but lacks relevant detail.

2. Insufficient 4.23 points

Reason for why students plagiarize is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Plagiarism Avoidance 13 points

Criteria Description

Plagiarism Avoidance

5. Target 13 points

Description of how students can avoid academic dishonesty in both group work or

as an individual is thorough and includes substantial explanation and relevant

supporting details.

4. Acceptable 11.05 points

Description of how students can avoid academic dishonesty in both group work or

as an individual is complete and includes relevant details.

3. Approaching 9.75 points

Description of how students can avoid academic dishonesty in both group work or

as an individual is provided but lacks relevant detail.

2. Insufficient 8.45 points

Description of how students can avoid academic dishonesty in both group work or

as an individual is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Paragraph Development and Transitions 3.25 points

Criteria Description

Paragraph Development and Transitions

5. Target 3.25 points

There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress

and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader.

Paragraph structure is seamless.

4. Acceptable 2.76 points

A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit

a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are

appropriate to purpose.

3. Approaching 2.44 points

Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in

organization or in their relationship to each other.

2. Insufficient 2.11 points

Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity,

coherence, or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

h d i i i l l k i d h

Mechanics of Writing 6.5 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 6.5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 5.52 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 4.88 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 4.23 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

Format/Documentation 3.25 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 3.25 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 2.76 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 2.44 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 2.11 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Total 65 points

UNV-103Rubric-Reflection_GCUCodeofConduct-Online.pdf

Reflection: GCU Code of Conduct - Online - Rubric

Academic Integrity Violation 13 points

Criteria Description

Academic Integrity Violation

5. Target 13 points

Explanation and example of one academic integrity violation is thorough and

includes substantial explanation and relevant supporting details.

4. Acceptable 11.05 points

Explanation and example of one academic integrity violation is complete and

includes relevant details.

3. Approaching 9.75 points

Explanation and example of one academic integrity violation is provided but lacks

relevant detail.

2. Insufficient 8.45 points

Explanation and example of one academic integrity violation is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Code of Conduct Violation 13 points

Criteria Description

Code of Conduct Violation

5. Target 13 points

Explanation and example of one code of conduct violation is thorough and includes

substantial explanation and relevant supporting details.

4. Acceptable 11.05 points

Explanation and example of one code of conduct violation is complete and includes

relevant details.

Collapse All

3. Approaching 9.75 points

Explanation and example of one code of conduct violation is provided but lacks

relevant detail.

2. Insufficient 8.45 points

Explanation and example of one code of conduct violation is incomplete.

Plagiarism De�nition 6.5 points

Criteria Description

Plagiarism Definition

5. Target 6.5 points

Definition of plagiarism in own words is thorough and includes substantial

explanation and relevant supporting details.

4. Acceptable 5.52 points

Definition of plagiarism in own words is complete and includes relevant details.

3. Approaching 4.88 points

Definition of plagiarism in own words is provided but lacks relevant detail.

2. Insufficient 4.23 points

Definition of plagiarism in own words is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Definition of plagiarism in own words is not provided.

Plagiarism Rationale 6.5 points

Criteria Description

Plagiarism Rationale

5. Target 6.5 points

Reason for why students plagiarize is thorough and includes substantial

explanation and relevant supporting details.

4. Acceptable 5.52 points

Reason for why students plagiarize is complete and includes relevant details.

3. Approaching 4.88 points

Reason for why students plagiarize is provided but lacks relevant detail.

2. Insufficient 4.23 points

Reason for why students plagiarize is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Plagiarism Avoidance 13 points

Criteria Description

Plagiarism Avoidance

5. Target 13 points

Description of how students can avoid academic dishonesty in both group work or

as an individual is thorough and includes substantial explanation and relevant

supporting details.

4. Acceptable 11.05 points

Description of how students can avoid academic dishonesty in both group work or

as an individual is complete and includes relevant details.

3. Approaching 9.75 points

Description of how students can avoid academic dishonesty in both group work or

as an individual is provided but lacks relevant detail.

2. Insufficient 8.45 points

Description of how students can avoid academic dishonesty in both group work or

as an individual is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Paragraph Development and Transitions 3.25 points

Criteria Description

Paragraph Development and Transitions

5. Target 3.25 points

There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress

and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader.

Paragraph structure is seamless.

4. Acceptable 2.76 points

A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit

a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are

appropriate to purpose.

3. Approaching 2.44 points

Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in

organization or in their relationship to each other.

2. Insufficient 2.11 points

Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity,

coherence, or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

h d i i i l l k i d h

Mechanics of Writing 6.5 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 6.5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 5.52 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 4.88 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 4.23 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

Format/Documentation 3.25 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 3.25 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 2.76 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 2.44 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 2.11 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Total 65 points

assignmentduein4hours.docx

Assessment Traits

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, using the attached APA Style template. https://halo.gcu.edu/resource/f9e45f90-d7e2-42a5-806a-98427a1eda3e

Reflect on the topic of GCU Code of Conduct and Academic Standards and in 400-500 words address the following prompts in four paragraphs:

2. The academic integrity section discusses academic dishonesty. One area of dishonesty is plagiarism. Define plagiarism in your own words and explain why you think students plagiarize?

3. Describe how students can avoid academic dishonesty in group work or as an individual?

4. How do you hold yourself and your peers accountable to the GCU Code of Conduct and Academic Integrity standards?

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

UNV-103Rubric-Reflection_GCUCodeofConduct-Online.pdf

Reflection: GCU Code of Conduct - Online - Rubric

Academic Integrity Violation 13 points

Criteria Description

Academic Integrity Violation

5. Target 13 points

Explanation and example of one academic integrity violation is thorough and

includes substantial explanation and relevant supporting details.

4. Acceptable 11.05 points

Explanation and example of one academic integrity violation is complete and

includes relevant details.

3. Approaching 9.75 points

Explanation and example of one academic integrity violation is provided but lacks

relevant detail.

2. Insufficient 8.45 points

Explanation and example of one academic integrity violation is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Code of Conduct Violation 13 points

Criteria Description

Code of Conduct Violation

5. Target 13 points

Explanation and example of one code of conduct violation is thorough and includes

substantial explanation and relevant supporting details.

4. Acceptable 11.05 points

Explanation and example of one code of conduct violation is complete and includes

relevant details.

Collapse All

3. Approaching 9.75 points

Explanation and example of one code of conduct violation is provided but lacks

relevant detail.

2. Insufficient 8.45 points

Explanation and example of one code of conduct violation is incomplete.

Plagiarism De�nition 6.5 points

Criteria Description

Plagiarism Definition

5. Target 6.5 points

Definition of plagiarism in own words is thorough and includes substantial

explanation and relevant supporting details.

4. Acceptable 5.52 points

Definition of plagiarism in own words is complete and includes relevant details.

3. Approaching 4.88 points

Definition of plagiarism in own words is provided but lacks relevant detail.

2. Insufficient 4.23 points

Definition of plagiarism in own words is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Definition of plagiarism in own words is not provided.

Plagiarism Rationale 6.5 points

Criteria Description

Plagiarism Rationale

5. Target 6.5 points

Reason for why students plagiarize is thorough and includes substantial

explanation and relevant supporting details.

4. Acceptable 5.52 points

Reason for why students plagiarize is complete and includes relevant details.

3. Approaching 4.88 points

Reason for why students plagiarize is provided but lacks relevant detail.

2. Insufficient 4.23 points

Reason for why students plagiarize is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Plagiarism Avoidance 13 points

Criteria Description

Plagiarism Avoidance

5. Target 13 points

Description of how students can avoid academic dishonesty in both group work or

as an individual is thorough and includes substantial explanation and relevant

supporting details.

4. Acceptable 11.05 points

Description of how students can avoid academic dishonesty in both group work or

as an individual is complete and includes relevant details.

3. Approaching 9.75 points

Description of how students can avoid academic dishonesty in both group work or

as an individual is provided but lacks relevant detail.

2. Insufficient 8.45 points

Description of how students can avoid academic dishonesty in both group work or

as an individual is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Paragraph Development and Transitions 3.25 points

Criteria Description

Paragraph Development and Transitions

5. Target 3.25 points

There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress

and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader.

Paragraph structure is seamless.

4. Acceptable 2.76 points

A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit

a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are

appropriate to purpose.

3. Approaching 2.44 points

Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in

organization or in their relationship to each other.

2. Insufficient 2.11 points

Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity,

coherence, or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

h d i i i l l k i d h

Mechanics of Writing 6.5 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 6.5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 5.52 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 4.88 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 4.23 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

Format/Documentation 3.25 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 3.25 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 2.76 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 2.44 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 2.11 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Total 65 points

assignmentduein4hours.docx

Assessment Traits

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, using the attached APA Style template. https://halo.gcu.edu/resource/f9e45f90-d7e2-42a5-806a-98427a1eda3e

Reflect on the topic of GCU Code of Conduct and Academic Standards and in 400-500 words address the following prompts in four paragraphs:

2. The academic integrity section discusses academic dishonesty. One area of dishonesty is plagiarism. Define plagiarism in your own words and explain why you think students plagiarize?

3. Describe how students can avoid academic dishonesty in group work or as an individual?

4. How do you hold yourself and your peers accountable to the GCU Code of Conduct and Academic Integrity standards?

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

UNV-103Rubric-Reflection_GCUCodeofConduct-Online.pdf

Reflection: GCU Code of Conduct - Online - Rubric

Academic Integrity Violation 13 points

Criteria Description

Academic Integrity Violation

5. Target 13 points

Explanation and example of one academic integrity violation is thorough and

includes substantial explanation and relevant supporting details.

4. Acceptable 11.05 points

Explanation and example of one academic integrity violation is complete and

includes relevant details.

3. Approaching 9.75 points

Explanation and example of one academic integrity violation is provided but lacks

relevant detail.

2. Insufficient 8.45 points

Explanation and example of one academic integrity violation is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Code of Conduct Violation 13 points

Criteria Description

Code of Conduct Violation

5. Target 13 points

Explanation and example of one code of conduct violation is thorough and includes

substantial explanation and relevant supporting details.

4. Acceptable 11.05 points

Explanation and example of one code of conduct violation is complete and includes

relevant details.

Collapse All

3. Approaching 9.75 points

Explanation and example of one code of conduct violation is provided but lacks

relevant detail.

2. Insufficient 8.45 points

Explanation and example of one code of conduct violation is incomplete.

Plagiarism De�nition 6.5 points

Criteria Description

Plagiarism Definition

5. Target 6.5 points

Definition of plagiarism in own words is thorough and includes substantial

explanation and relevant supporting details.

4. Acceptable 5.52 points

Definition of plagiarism in own words is complete and includes relevant details.

3. Approaching 4.88 points

Definition of plagiarism in own words is provided but lacks relevant detail.

2. Insufficient 4.23 points

Definition of plagiarism in own words is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Definition of plagiarism in own words is not provided.

Plagiarism Rationale 6.5 points

Criteria Description

Plagiarism Rationale

5. Target 6.5 points

Reason for why students plagiarize is thorough and includes substantial

explanation and relevant supporting details.

4. Acceptable 5.52 points

Reason for why students plagiarize is complete and includes relevant details.

3. Approaching 4.88 points

Reason for why students plagiarize is provided but lacks relevant detail.

2. Insufficient 4.23 points

Reason for why students plagiarize is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Plagiarism Avoidance 13 points

Criteria Description

Plagiarism Avoidance

5. Target 13 points

Description of how students can avoid academic dishonesty in both group work or

as an individual is thorough and includes substantial explanation and relevant

supporting details.

4. Acceptable 11.05 points

Description of how students can avoid academic dishonesty in both group work or

as an individual is complete and includes relevant details.

3. Approaching 9.75 points

Description of how students can avoid academic dishonesty in both group work or

as an individual is provided but lacks relevant detail.

2. Insufficient 8.45 points

Description of how students can avoid academic dishonesty in both group work or

as an individual is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Paragraph Development and Transitions 3.25 points

Criteria Description

Paragraph Development and Transitions

5. Target 3.25 points

There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress

and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader.

Paragraph structure is seamless.

4. Acceptable 2.76 points

A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit

a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are

appropriate to purpose.

3. Approaching 2.44 points

Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in

organization or in their relationship to each other.

2. Insufficient 2.11 points

Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity,

coherence, or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

h d i i i l l k i d h

Mechanics of Writing 6.5 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 6.5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 5.52 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 4.88 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 4.23 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

Format/Documentation 3.25 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 3.25 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 2.76 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 2.44 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 2.11 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Total 65 points

other Questions(10)