PSYC 676 Developmental Neuropsychology
Emotion, Attention and Consciousness
3 years ago
4
LiteratureReviewPaperOutlineAssignmentInstructions.docx
LiteratureReviewPaperOutlineExample.docx
- LRP3.jpg
LiteratureReviewPaperOutlineAssignmentInstructions.docx
PSYC 676
Literature Review Paper: Part 3 - Outline Assignment Instructions
Overview
You will continue working on your comprehensive Literature Review Paper by composing an outline of your paper. An outline can be defined as a detailed, organizational plan to help you draft a piece of writing. It provides a meaningful infrastructure for your ideas before you even begin the writing process. Writing an outline before beginning a paper is the most effective way to organize your thoughts because it breaks down the argument that you are trying to make in a clear, hierarchical manner and it helps you visualize the overall flow and format of your paper.
Instructions
For the current assignment, all 3 parts of your paper should be represented in the outline that you create: the Introduction, Body, and Conclusion. Please write in complete sentences while addressing the following content:
I. In the Introduction of your paper:
A. Begin by clearly stating the purpose of your paper. Identify the chief reason you are writing the paper.
B. Next, briefly summarize the main points that you plan to cover in your paper.
C. Explain why your topic is interesting or useful to the target audience (i.e., other experts in the field) who likely would be reading it.
D. Finally, present your thesis statement. The thesis statement typically is located at the end of your opening paragraph since the opening paragraph serves to set the context for the thesis.
II. In the Body of your paper, present the argument in support of your thesis statement.
A. Specifically, you will present the main points that evidence/substantiate your argument. Remember the “Rule of 3.” A strong argument has at least 3 main points/propositions to support it. Present your main points in order of strength. Begin with a strong main point, then use a stronger one, and end with your strongest main point.
B. Additionally, each main point ought to use at least 3 primary, peer-reviewed journal articles/supporting facts to substantiate and directly evidence it. You will provide specific details from each article that help explain the supporting facts to your reader
· What was the research design?
· Who were the participants?
· What variables/outcomes were being measured and how were they being measured?
· What were the main findings and interpretations, and how do the findings and interpretations directly support your thesis/main point(s)?
C. Be sure that the details provided from each article that you use as evidence for your argument are well integrated into the outline’s rationale and effectively support the main points being made.
D. Remember that in the body of your outline, you are not just reviewing or summarizing a list of loosely related articles about your topic, instead you are presenting a logical progression of ideas in support of your thesis statement.
III. In the Conclusion of your paper,
A. Restate your thesis
B. Summarize your main points.
C. Then, using scriptural citations to support your rationale, discuss the following issues as they relate to the disease/disorder that is the focus of your paper:
· Discuss the relationship among the causes of the disease/disorder, original sin, and living in a fallen world.
· Discuss whether or not neuropsychological assessment is a Biblically-supported practice that Christian professionals can use to serve others.
· Discuss whether or not the typical methods used to treat the disease/disorder are consistent with a Christian worldview.
Formatting Specifications
· All assignment elements adhere to current APA “professional paper” formatting standards.
· In-text citations are included and accurately formatted according to current APA guidelines.
· All text is typed and double-spaced in a standard, university-approved font.
· All pages utilize 1-inch margins.
· A current APA-formatted title page is provided.
· Your outline with the paper title centered at the top is included.
· Every level in your outline should be written in full, clearly composed sentences
· Every level of your outline should have at least 3 entries (i.e., I, II, III… A, B, C… 1, 2, 3… a, b, c…)
· A current APA-formatted References section with at least 10-12 primary, peer-reviewed research articles is included.
· Individual references in the References section are formatted according to current APA guidelines.
· Sources in the References section match sources cited in the body of the outline.
Writing and Organization
· Write in a scholarly writing style with a formal, graduate-level tone
· Be concise, not wordy
· Organize your ideas logically
· Utilize appropriate grammar, diction and punctuation
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Page 2 of 2
LiteratureReviewPaperOutlineExample.docx
Running head: NEUROBIOLOGY OF OCD 1
NEUROBIOLOGY OF OCD 2
Neurobiological Substrates of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Your Name
Department of Psychology, Liberty University
Neurobiological Substrates of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
I. Introduction
A. Identify the purpose of your paper
B. Summarize your (at least 3) main points
C. Describe why your paper is interesting/useful/meaningful to your target audience (i.e., other experts in the field)
D. Present your thesis statement
II. Body (a.k.a. Argument)
A. State Main Point #1 (in a complete sentence)
1. Describe Supporting Fact #1 (Cite the journal article(s) where you got this finding/idea).
a. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
b. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
c. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
2. Describe Supporting Fact #2 (Cite the journal article(s) where you got this finding/idea).
a. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
b. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
3. Describe Supporting Fact #3 (Cite the journal article(s) where you got this finding/idea).
a. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
b. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
c. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
B. State Main Point #2 (in a complete sentence)
1. Describe Supporting Fact #1 (Cite the journal article(s) where you got this finding/idea).
a. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
b. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
c. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
2. Describe Supporting Fact #2 (Cite the journal article(s) where you got this finding/idea).
a. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
b. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
c. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
3. Describe Supporting Fact #3 (Cite the journal article(s) where you got this finding/idea).
a. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
b. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
c. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
C. State Main Point # 3 (in a complete sentence)
1. Describe Supporting Fact #1 (Cite the journal article(s) where you got this finding/idea).
a. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
b. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
c. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
2. Describe Supporting Fact #2 (Cite the journal article(s) where you got this finding/idea).
a. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
b. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
c. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
3. Describe Supporting Fact #3 (Cite the journal article(s) where you got this finding/idea).
a. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
b. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
c. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
D. Continue as above until you have covered all of the Main Points in your argument.
III. Conclusion
A. Restate Thesis (in slightly different words to remain interesting)
B. Summarize Your Main Points (also in slightly different words…)
C. Discuss Implications for a Christian Worldview
1. Discuss the relationship among the causes of the disease/disorder, original sin, and living in a fallen world. Use a relevant scriptural citation to support your rationale.
2. Discuss whether or not neuropsychological assessment is a Biblically-supported practice that Christian professionals can use to serve others. Use a relevant scriptural citation to support your rationale.
3. Discuss whether or not the typical methods used to treat the disease/disorder are consistent with a Christian worldview. Use a relevant scriptural citation to support your rationale.
References
Baxter, L.R., Schwartz, J.M., Mazziotta, J.C.; Phelps, M.E., Pahl, J.J., Guze, B.H. & Fairbanks, L. (1998). Cerebral glucose metabolic rates in nondepressed patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 1560–1563. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1990.01810210048007
Baxter, L.R., Schwartz, J.M.; Bergman, K.S., & Szuba, M.P. (1992). Caudate glucose metabolic rate changes with both drug and behavior therapy for obsessive–compulsive disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 49(9). 1559–1563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4927(99)0051-7
Busatto, G.F., Zamignani, D.R., Buchpiguel, C.A., Garrido, G.E.J., Glabus, M.F., Rocha, E.T., Maia, A.F., Rasario-Campos, M.C., Castro, C.C., Furuie, S.S., Gutierrez, M.A., McGuire, P.K., & Miguel, E.C. (2000). A voxel-based investigation of regional cerebral blood flow abnormalities in obsessive–compulsive disorder using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 99(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4927(00)00050-0
Ebert, D., Speck, O., Konig, A., Berger, M., Hennig, J., & Hohagen, F. (1997). 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy in obsessive–compulsive disorder: evidence for neuronal loss in the cingulate gyrus and the right striatum. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 74, 173–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4927(97)00016-4
Hansen, E.S., Hasselbalch, S., Law, I., & Bolwig, T.G. (2002). The caudate nucleus in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Reduced metabolism following treatment with paroxetine: a PET study. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 5, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1461145701002681
Nordahl, T.E., Benkelfat, C., Semple, W.E., Gross, M., King, A.C., & Cohen, R.M. (1998). Cerebral glucose metabolic rates in obsessive compulsive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology, 2, 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4927(99)00040-2
- What do the characters of the god's reveal about the beliefs of the ancient Greeks?
- w6-2 900 words essay - Rey Writer
- Reaction Paper for general psychology,
- INFO
- VHDL assignment # 3
- 1 Homework Help - NO PLAGIARISM!!!!!!
- Power Point slides $10
- BCG Assignment
- FINANCE
- 1. Information and information services are said to be different in terms of economic behavior from other goods and services...