Project 3: Leading Ethically and Legally at Home and Abroad
3 years ago
20
Project3Step4ReviewtheGlobalShippersInc.CaseFile.docx
Project3Step3WriteYourElectropicLLCReport.docx
Project3Step1PerformEthicalAnalysis.docx
Project3Step5GatherandAnalyzetheInformation.docx
BadaraccosRightvsRightFramework.pdf
Project3Step7SubmitYourWork.docx
Project3LeadingEthicallyandLegallyatHomeandAbroad.docx
Project3Step2PerformLegalAnalysis.docx
ElectropicLLC.pdf
RsumFraud.pdf
Project3Step6EngageintheGlobalLawandEthicsDiscussion.docx
- GlobalShippersInc_.pdf
- EmploymentatWill.pdf
Project3Step4ReviewtheGlobalShippersInc.CaseFile.docx
Step 4: Review the Global Shippers, Inc. Case File
Now that you’ve submitted your response to the Electropic incident, you turn your attention to the Global Shippers case file. The vice president has appointed you to a board of confidential advisors to discuss whether the Global Shippers CEO's actions were legal and ethical.
You open the file. Reading over the specifics of this situation, you soon understand that the VP is legitimately concerned about the legal and ethical violations.
In the next step, you will gather the information you need to identify important issues for the VP.
Project3Step3WriteYourElectropicLLCReport.docx
Step 3: Write Your Electropic LLC Report
Use your outline and research notes to prepare your report. Be sure to meet the following requirements laid out by the VP:
· Using Badaracco’s right vs. right framework and your legal analysis, prepare a report.
· Include APA-formatted in-text citations and an APA-formatted reference list (do not format the body of the report using APA style, just the reference list). See references and citations for details.
· Include in your report a detailed analysis of all four questions and three tests of the Badaracco framework; also include an analysis of the legal issues.
· Include a specific recommendation on what actions, if any, HR should take based on your legal and ethical analysis and conclusions.
· The report should be no more than 10 pages (double spaced, 12-point font; the reference list does not count toward page limit).
· Title your file using this protocol: lastname_Electropic_date.docx.
.
Project3Step1PerformEthicalAnalysis.docx
Step 1: Perform Ethical Analysis
Vice President Dodger has provided you with the Electropic LLC case file, which details recent events at Electropic LLC, one of Colossal’s technology companies. He has asked you to analyze the legal and ethical aspects of the case. The ethical aspects of the situation seem complex, and you realize that you need a structured way to think through the various resolutions to the case and their implications. You know that there are many different schools of ethical thought and a variety of frameworks or approaches for analyzing ethical problems, but you decide that the best approach to this particular situation is Badaracco's right versus right framework.
You’ll start by working through the right vs. right ethical analysis, considering the various options for action and the winners and losers for each option. What are your recommendations for the best ethical course of action? Be sure to analyze all four questions and all three tests of Badaracco’s framework.
When you've finished analyzing the ethical aspects of this case, continue to the next step, in which you'll consider any legal issues that could a
Project3Step5GatherandAnalyzetheInformation.docx
Step 5: Gather and Analyze the Information
While you have some general awareness that there are many ramifications of international transactions from legal and ethical perspectives and many cultural differences among countries, you realize that you need to know a lot more about these subjects before you can attempt to respond to the VP's questions.
Before you begin your research, listen to this introduction to cross-cultural awareness podcast as it relates to working with people from other cultures. Then review the following topics as you work to meet the VP's request: international business ethics, laws, and regulations, cross-cultural ethical business decision making (specifically focus on the "Ethical Theory in Global Business" resources), and country cultural differences.
BadaraccosRightvsRightFramework.pdf
Learning Topic
Badaracco’s Right vs Right Framework There are a variety of ethical frameworks that may be used instrumentally to analyze
those difficult questions that businesspersons must regularly address. Some ethical issues
present clear yes or no answers, a clear right and wrong, but other ethical issues are much
more difficult to address.
Professor Joseph Badaracco developed a framework for addressing those more difficult
questions, and particularly those questions of "right versus right"; that is, when an ethical
dilemma could result in multiple "right" responses, based in attempted adherence to
multiple, conflicting ethical values that cannot simultaneously be fulfilled. Badaracco's
framework aims to resolve ethical dilemmas involving conflicting yet legitimate moral
values.
Harvard FSS: Defining Moments: A Framework for Moral Decisions
(https://libanswers.umgc.edu/faq/339659)
© 2023 University of Maryland Global Campus
All links to external sites were verified at the time of publication. UMGC is not responsible for the validity or integrity
of information located at external sites.
Resources
Project3Step7SubmitYourWork.docx
Step 7: Submit Your Work
Recommended Project Delivery
|
Step |
Deliverable |
|
Step 3 |
Electropic LLC report |
|
Step 6 |
Global Shippers discussion |
Project3LeadingEthicallyandLegallyatHomeandAbroad.docx
Project 3: Leading Ethically and Legally at Home and Abroad
The nature of an organization's business and the environment the business operates in will guide management in ensuring that decisions are both legal and ethical. In this project, you will expand your ability to make ethically responsible decisions by applying an ethical decision-making model to resolve a business ethics case. Begin with Step 1: Perform Ethical Analysis.
Competencies
Your work will be evaluated using the competencies listed below.
· 1.3: Provide sufficient, correctly cited support that substantiates the writer's ideas.
· 1.4: Tailor communications to the audience.
· 1.6: Follow conventions of Standard Written English.
· 2.1: Identify and clearly explain the issue, question, or problem under critical consideration.
· 2.4: Consider and analyze information in context to the issue or problem.
· 2.5: Develop well-reasoned ideas, conclusions or decisions, checking them against relevant criteria and benchmarks.
· 5.1: Develop constructive resolutions for ethical dilemmas based on application of ethical theories, principles and models.
· 5.2: Assess the implications of legal, ethical and cultural (national) standards on an organization's operations in global markets and make recommendations for appropriate actions.
· 5.4: Resolve workplace conflicts using the optimal approaches and techniques for the situation and involved parties.
· 7.4: Analyze the impact of international and foreign laws on US organizations acting domestically and abroad.
· 9.3: Apply the principles of employment law for ethical practices and risk mitigation.
Project3Step2PerformLegalAnalysis.docx
Step 2: Perform Legal Analysis
As you continue to sift through and consider all the details of the Electropic LLC case, Vice President Dodger reaches out with an important note:
INBOX (1 NEW EMAIL)
From: Kenneth Dodger, Vice President, Colossal Corporation
To: You
Just wanted to remind you that in addition to the ethical aspects of the Electropic LLC situation, there may be legal implications that the human resources department needs to account for before moving forward with any plan of action. To that end, you’ll need to review any relevant information about fraud and employment at will, that might affect what could or should be done about the situation at Electropic LLC.
When you’ve worked through the possible legal implications and arrived at a recommended course of action for Electropic LLC's HR department, it's time to present your analyses, recommendations, and action plan in a report.
Please use your outline and research notes to inform the writing of your report.
That’s all for now. I know this is a tricky case. Thank you for your efforts.
Ken
image1.png
ElectropicLLC.pdf
Electropic LLC
Notice: Contains Confidential Information
Electropic LLC is a respected and profitable website design and hosting company in
Colossal Corporation's technology group. Melissa Aldredge has been a project manager at
Electropic LLC for several years and was recently considered for promotion to a senior
project manager position. Ultimately, the promotion was awarded to another long-term
employee, June Pyle. June and Melissa have a history of one-upping each other and
sharing an internal rivalry within the company.
Melissa recently reported internally that she had learned that June, who was given the
promotion over her, had never finished her MBA degree. All of June's business cards have
"MBA" after her name, and the signature line of her email reads "June Pyle, MBA."
Electropic LLC's policy manual states that potential employees must submit transcripts for
all degrees listed on their resumes. However, this requirement was not in place 10 years
ago when June Pyle was hired. June has a history of stellar performance and was
promoted not because of her MBA, but because of her consistently exemplary work. June
has received excellent performance evaluations during her time at Electropic LLC, and her
leadership has led to increased revenue as well as positive press for the company. Her
record of success is what led to her promotion.
As a result of Melissa's report, the director of human resources sent an email to all
employees who were hired prior to the policy change requiring transcript validation,
asking that they provide transcripts to validate their credentials. June did not respond to
the director's request for transcripts and was called into the director's office. In a very
tense and tearful interview, June confessed to the director that she does not have an
Course Resource
MBA. She admitted that she was 12 credits away from completing her degree, but when
her dad got sick, she had to drop out. She said that she really needed a job to support her
family and she put the MBA on her resume hoping it would help her find a job. She shared
that she always intended to go back to school but became so busy with work that she
didn’t have time. Once she was hired, she felt that there was no turning back and she had
to keep the lie going by placing "MBA" in her email signature line and on her business
cards.
An MBA was not a requirement for the assistant project specialist job June was hired for
10 years ago, but four years ago, it was made a requirement for the senior project
manager position she holds now. Two of the current senior project managers do not have
MBA degrees because they were promoted before this requirement was in place.
Vice President Dodger has asked you to write a memo with your recommendations on
how human resources should handle this issue. June has a record of excellence with
Electropic LLC, and her superiors would be unhappy to lose her; however, ethical practice
and the law must be considered here as well.
© 2023 University of Maryland Global Campus
All links to external sites were verified at the time of publication. UMGC is not responsible for the validity or integrity
of information located at external sites.
RsumFraud.pdf
Résumé Fraud
Fraud, often called misrepresentation, is a very broad legal concept that incorporates a
variety of types of fraud and misrepresentation, both civil and criminal. There are
considerable variations across the states as to the specific categorization of types of fraud
as either civil or criminal law violations, or both. The federal government criminalizes a
variety of types of fraud including mail and wire fraud, bankruptcy fraud, and securities
fraud. These federal laws apply to everyone in the United States, regardless of the state in
which the fraud occurs. Although there is variation as to which explicit types of fraud are
criminalized within each state, in all states, some types of fraud unquestionably carry both
civil and criminal penalties.
Résumé fraud is a specific type of fraud that may result in civil or criminal penalties, or
both, depending on which state the fraud occurs in. In its most primal form, résumé fraud
is a type of common law, civil fraud wherein the intentional misrepresentations of material
facts are made in a résumé, and justifiably relied upon in the hiring of an individual for
employment. In the absence of any statutory provision specifically addressing résumé
fraud in a given state, the common law provides the remedy for résumé fraud typically in
the form of damages (monetary compensation). However, many states have statutorily
imposed sanctions specifically for committing résumé fraud. For example, in New Jersey,
both persons and legal entities are prohibited from intending to deceive by falsely
representing the receipt of a degree, credential, or certification, which one has not
actually acquired "in connection with any business, trade, profession or occupation"
(N.J.S.A. 18A:3-15.2). A violation of this provision is treated as a civil law violation, and
each instance of résumé fraud carries with it a $1000.00 civil fine (N.J.S.A. 18A:3-15.5).
On the other hand, in the state of Kentucky, "fraudulent use of an educational record" is
considered a Class A misdemeanor, which is punishable by up to 12 months in jail and
fines (KY Rev. Stat. Ann. 434.442). The Kentucky statute explicitly includes making false
written representations for certain educational achievements, such as a degree, in
employment applications. The states do differ as to how they treat résumé fraud, but
whether it is treated as a civil violation or as a criminal violation, résumé fraud is a
dishonest practice that should be avoided.
At-will employees should be particularly aware that résumé fraud provides a justifiable
basis for termination that may undermine otherwise legitimate arguments for wrongful
discharge (or other exceptions to the employment at will doctrine). For contract
employees, résumé fraud is often considered "just cause" for termination of an employee
who would otherwise be protected from termination by contractual "just cause"
provisions. Finally, in addition to the legal consequences of résumé fraud, the reputational
damage of lying on a résumé could undermine one’s career prospects as it did for former
Yahoo CEO, Scott Thompson, whose résumé represented that he had a double major,
including a degree in computer science, from Stonehill College, a degree that was not
awarded from until several years after he graduated. After being exposed by a Yahoo
shareholder, Thompson stepped down from his position in disgrace (Mackay, 2012).
References
Mackey, M. (2012, May 15). Ex-Yahoo CEO Scott Thompson and seven other cases of
resume fraud. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/15/yahoo-ceo-scott-thompsons-resume-
fraud_n_1516061.html
Résumé Misrepresentations
(https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/scor/uncurated/mba/2218-
mba630/learning-resourcelist1/resume-misrepresentations.html?
ou=770958)
What is Fraud?
(https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/scor/uncurated/mba/2218-
mba630/learning-resourcelist1/what-is-fraud-.html?
ou=770958)
© 2023 University of Maryland Global Campus
All links to external sites were verified at the time of publication. UMGC is not responsible for the validity or integrity
of information located at external sites.
Resources
Project3Step6EngageintheGlobalLawandEthicsDiscussion.docx
Step 6: Engage in the Global Law and Ethics Discussion
Discussion
Now that you’ve gathered information and analyzed the legal and ethical consequences of Manning’s actions as outlined in the Global Shippers case file, you’re expected to discuss your conclusions and rationales with the board of confidential advisors convened by Vice President Dodger. Two main requirements will structure this discussion:
· First, each board member is to post an initial response fully analyzing the following questions:
· Were Manning’s actions legal under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and what are the possible penalties for violating the act?
· Were Manning’s actions legal under the UK Bribery Act and what are the possible penalties for violating the act?
· Were Manning’s actions ethical, particularly in light of differing cultural norms?
When answering these questions, be sure to apply the following guidelines: Provide a full explanation for why all his actions were or were not legal and ethical in your discussion, including a full rationale for each conclusion. This post can be as long or as short as you need in order to effectively make your points.
· Second, each member of the confidential board of advisors must provide a substantive response to at least one posting from a colleague in the discussion, critiquing the initial post with rationale based on legal and ethical analysis.
- help
- Week 9 Discussion
- perfect writer only
- Hi, I need someone to help me with this essay. Topic What is your understanding of cultural differences? How is cultural understanding important...
- MKTG 410 Advertising and Public Relations Week 2 Assignments Devry
- thanks!
- I need a Profesional Management paper written, is there a expert out there?
- for hifsa shaukat
- Managerial Analysis 5
- NO PLAGIARISM WHAT SO EVER!!!