project

SOCW_6336_Week3_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator.

18.5 to >16.65 ptsExceeds ExpectationsResponse meets expectations for a first draft and exceeds through insightful explanation.

16.65 to >14.8 ptsMeets ExpectationsResponse fully describes the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator.

14.8 to >12.95 ptsFairResponse provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed description of the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator.

12.95 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementResponse makes little or no attempt to describe the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator.

18.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the forms of assessment that you might use and a brief description of why you might use these forms.

19 to >17.1 ptsExceeds ExpectationsResponse meets expectations for a first draft and exceeds through insightful explanation.

17.1 to >15.2 ptsMeets ExpectationsResponse fully describes the forms of assessments that one might use and a brief description of why one might use those forms.

15.2 to >13.3 ptsFairResponse provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed description of the forms of assessment that one might use and a brief description of why one might use those forms.

13.3 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementResponse makes little or no attempt to describe the forms of assessment that one might use and a brief description of why one might use those forms.

19 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse the Learning Resources to support your assignment. Make sure to provide APA citations and a reference list.

5 to >4.5 ptsExceeds ExpectationsResponse meets expectations for a first draft and exceeds in the use of specific references as support.

4.5 to >4.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsResponse is supported with specific references to resources.

4 to >3.5 ptsFairResponse is somewhat supported, but specific references to resources are vague or poorly connected.

3.5 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementResponse is not supported with specific references.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

7.5 to >6.75 ptsExceeds ExpectationsPaper meets length requirements, meets expectations, is generally error-free (two or fewer), and further exceeds by showcasing an exemplary scholarly voice to develop its message or communicate ideas...    Paper appropriately paraphrases sources, using one or fewer quotes. Presents polished APA Style. Citations, reference list, and paper formatting are generally error-free (two or fewer)...    Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.

6.75 to >6.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsPaper meets length requirements and is clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor, minimal (three to five), and do not interfere with the scholarly message. The paper displays effective organization and focus to communicate ideas...    Paper appropriately paraphrases sources. Paper may use two to three short quotes but provides appropriate reference. Consistently documents sources in APA Style. Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with a few minimal errors (three to five). The reference list is complete and contains only minimal errors (three to five). Paper formatting is appropriate... There is a clear distinction between cited content and original thought...    Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.

6 to >5.25 ptsFairPaper does not meet length requirements (either somewhat too short or too long). The paper is somewhat clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor but frequent (5–10) and occasionally interfere with the message. The paper lacks clear organization or occasionally strays from the focus...     Paper may rely on four short quotes or one to two long quotes (over 40 words) and/or does not sufficiently paraphrase material from other resources into student’s own words. Attempts to document sources in APA Style. Citations are present but contain frequent APA errors or omissions. A reference list is provided but is incomplete and/or contains frequent APA errors. Paper formatting may be incorrect (e.g., single-spaced or without a title page)...  Occasionally lacks a clear distinction between cited content and original thought...    Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.

5.25 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementPaper does not meet length requirements (either significantly too short or too long). The paper lacks clarity and coherence. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are major, pervasive (11+), and interfere with the message. The paper is not organized or lacks focus...    Paper relies excessively on quoting (five or more short quotes or three or more long quotes [over 40 words]) and/or uses quoted material without paraphrasing or referencing the source of the material. Little or no attempt has been made to document sources in APA Style. Citations are infrequent or missing, and a reference list is not provided. Little or no attempt has been made to format the paper in APA Style... There is no distinction between cited content and original thought...  Tone and presentation of ideas reveal bias and subjectivity.

7.5 pts

SOCW_6336_Week3_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator.

18.5 to >16.65 ptsExceeds ExpectationsResponse meets expectations for a first draft and exceeds through insightful explanation.

16.65 to >14.8 ptsMeets ExpectationsResponse fully describes the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator.

14.8 to >12.95 ptsFairResponse provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed description of the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator.

12.95 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementResponse makes little or no attempt to describe the crisis, including the event/situation, implications, responders, victims, survivors, and, if applicable, the perpetrator.

18.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the forms of assessment that you might use and a brief description of why you might use these forms.

19 to >17.1 ptsExceeds ExpectationsResponse meets expectations for a first draft and exceeds through insightful explanation.

17.1 to >15.2 ptsMeets ExpectationsResponse fully describes the forms of assessments that one might use and a brief description of why one might use those forms.

15.2 to >13.3 ptsFairResponse provides a limited, incomplete, or vaguely developed description of the forms of assessment that one might use and a brief description of why one might use those forms.

13.3 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementResponse makes little or no attempt to describe the forms of assessment that one might use and a brief description of why one might use those forms.

19 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse the Learning Resources to support your assignment. Make sure to provide APA citations and a reference list.

5 to >4.5 ptsExceeds ExpectationsResponse meets expectations for a first draft and exceeds in the use of specific references as support.

4.5 to >4.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsResponse is supported with specific references to resources.

4 to >3.5 ptsFairResponse is somewhat supported, but specific references to resources are vague or poorly connected.

3.5 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementResponse is not supported with specific references.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

7.5 to >6.75 ptsExceeds ExpectationsPaper meets length requirements, meets expectations, is generally error-free (two or fewer), and further exceeds by showcasing an exemplary scholarly voice to develop its message or communicate ideas...    Paper appropriately paraphrases sources, using one or fewer quotes. Presents polished APA Style. Citations, reference list, and paper formatting are generally error-free (two or fewer)...    Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.

6.75 to >6.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsPaper meets length requirements and is clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor, minimal (three to five), and do not interfere with the scholarly message. The paper displays effective organization and focus to communicate ideas...    Paper appropriately paraphrases sources. Paper may use two to three short quotes but provides appropriate reference. Consistently documents sources in APA Style. Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with a few minimal errors (three to five). The reference list is complete and contains only minimal errors (three to five). Paper formatting is appropriate... There is a clear distinction between cited content and original thought...    Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.

6 to >5.25 ptsFairPaper does not meet length requirements (either somewhat too short or too long). The paper is somewhat clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor but frequent (5–10) and occasionally interfere with the message. The paper lacks clear organization or occasionally strays from the focus...     Paper may rely on four short quotes or one to two long quotes (over 40 words) and/or does not sufficiently paraphrase material from other resources into student’s own words. Attempts to document sources in APA Style. Citations are present but contain frequent APA errors or omissions. A reference list is provided but is incomplete and/or contains frequent APA errors. Paper formatting may be incorrect (e.g., single-spaced or without a title page)...  Occasionally lacks a clear distinction between cited content and original thought...    Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt.

5.25 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementPaper does not meet length requirements (either significantly too short or too long). The paper lacks clarity and coherence. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are major, pervasive (11+), and interfere with the message. The paper is not organized or lacks focus...    Paper relies excessively on quoting (five or more short quotes or three or more long quotes [over 40 words]) and/or uses quoted material without paraphrasing or referencing the source of the material. Little or no attempt has been made to document sources in APA Style. Citations are infrequent or missing, and a reference list is not provided. Little or no attempt has been made to format the paper in APA Style... There is no distinction between cited content and original thought...  Tone and presentation of ideas reveal bias and subjectivity.

7.5 pts