Professional development plan (pdp) part 2

A2_Rubric.pdf

Assignment 2: Capstone Project: Project I Description: The baccalaureate graduate will participate in quality initiatives, recognizing that these are complex system issues, involving other members of the healthcare team. Course Competency(ies): 1, 2, 3, 4 QSEN Competency(ies): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 BSN Essential: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education Domain 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

Competency Mastery

100%

Proficient

85%

Acceptable

77%

Basic

70%

Deficient-Mastery

not Demonstrated

Develops a well- organized discussion and synthesis of the capstone project topic and purpose. Provide details of the issue or problem to be solved. Provides details to fully explain the importance of the project in 2-3 pages. 10%

Thoroughly provides an in-depth explanation of the chosen capstone project. Synthesizes the background of the problem and provides details to fully explain the issue or problem and the importance of the project.

Partially provides an explanation of the chosen capstone project using some detail to explain the issue or problem and the importance of the project.

Chosen capstone project contains little to no explanation with limited details for the issue or problem and the importance of the project.

Faculty does not approve topic. See faculty feedback on what needs to be addressed.

No paper submitted or content missing.

Include a minimum of five (5) scholarly, peer-reviewed articles to support your project.

5%

Five relevant and appropriate scholarly, peer- reviewed articles are included.

Four relevant and appropriate scholarly, peer- reviewed articles are included.

Three or less scholarly, peer- reviewed articles are included.

References are not from scholarly, peer- reviewed articles.

No references listed.

Articles are included on the reference page and cited in-text to support the discussion.

5%

Five or more articles are included on the reference page and cited in- text to support the discussion.

Four or more articles are included on the reference page and cited in-text to support the discussion.

At least three articles are included on the reference page and cited in-text to support the discussion.

Articles are listed on the reference page only or listed in- text only.

References are not relevant or appropriate for the topic.

No articles are included on the reference page or cited in any in-text references.

Develop a well- organized synthesis of the five articles and discuss how the literature will support the validity of the project.

Discuss evidence-based rationales to support the project.

2-3 paragraphs per article.

Label Headings as Article One, Article Two, etc.

10%

Completely develops a well- organized synthesis of the five articles and fully discusses how the literature will support the validity of the project. Discusses evidence-based rationales to support the project.

Partially develops a well-organized synthesis of the five articles and describes how the literature will support the validity of the project. Some information is missing or does not fully describe evidence-based rationales to support the project. Each article does not contain 2-3 paragraphs.

Synthesis of the five articles not developed, and description of how the literature will support the validity of the project is lacking details. Information is missing, vague, or does not describe evidence-based rationales to support the project. Each article does not contain 2-3 paragraphs.

Faculty does not approve topic. See faculty feedback on what needs to be addressed.

No paper submitted or content missing.

Identify a minimum of three (3) stakeholders necessary for the success of the project. Describe their role/title, authority to approve the project, methods to gain buy-in and support. 3-4 paragraphs per objective 10%

Includes three stakeholders and completely discusses how each is necessary for the success of the project. Describes the three roles/titles, authority to approve the project, and the methods to gain buy-in and support. Includes 3-4 paragraphs

Includes two stakeholders and completely discusses how each is necessary for the success of the project. Describes the two roles/titles, authority to approve the project, and the methods to gain buy-in and support. Includes 2-3 paragraphs

One or less stakeholders are identified. Details are vague or missing to describe necessity for the success of the project, roles/titles, authority to approve the project, and the methods to gain buy- in and support. Minimal discussion

Faculty does not approve topic. See faculty feedback on what needs to be addressed.

No paper submitted or content missing.

Identify and discuss two (2) potential barriers that could impact the successful implementation of your project. 2-3 paragraphs (minimum) 10%

Identifies and analyzes two potential barriers that could impact the successful implementation of the project. At least 2-3 paragraphs included.

Identifies and examines two potential barriers that could impact the successful implementation of the project. Less than 2 paragraphs included.

Vaguely summarizes two or less potential barriers that could impact the successful implementation of the project. Minimal discussion is provided.

Faculty does not approve topic. See faculty feedback on what needs to be addressed.

No paper submitted or content missing.

Identify and describe two (2) strategies that can be utilized to help overcome or reduce the barriers. 2-3 paragraphs (minimum) 10%

Identifies and analyzes two strategies that can be utilized to help overcome or reduce the barriers. At least 2-3 paragraphs included.

Identifies and examines two strategies that can be utilized to help overcome or reduce the barriers. Only one strategy included with complete discussion. Less than 2 paragraphs included.

Vaguely summarizes two or less strategies that can be utilized to help overcome or reduce the barriers. Information is missing or unclear. Minimal discussion.

Faculty does not approve topic. See faculty feedback on what needs to be addressed.

No paper submitted or content missing.

Provide in-depth discussion of the benefits and impact the project will have once implemented. Include citations for support. 2-3 paragraphs (minimum) 10%

Completely provides in-depth discussion of the benefits and impact the project will have once implemented. Includes citations for support. Includes 2-3 paragraphs (minimum)

Partially provides discussion of the benefits and impact the project will have once implemented. Includes citations for support. Includes 2-3 paragraphs (minimum)

Vaguely summarizes the benefits and impact the project will have once implemented. Does not include citations for support. Minimal discussion.

Faculty does not approve topic. See faculty feedback on what needs to be addressed.

No paper submitted or content missing.

Provide an in- depth discussion of a minimum of three (3) areas of focus in which the capstone project will impact the student’s personal practice. 2-3 paragraphs (minimum) 10%

Completely identifies and analyzes a minimum of three (3) areas of focus in which the capstone project will impact the student’s personal practice. 2-3 paragraphs (minimum)

Identifies and examines a minimum of three or less areas of focus in which the capstone project will impact the student’s personal practice. Only two areas of focus are included. Some details are missing. Two or less paragraphs.

Vaguely summarizes the details of area of focus in which the capstone project will impact the student’s personal practice. Details are missing. Two or less areas of focus are mentioned. Minimal discussion .

Faculty does not approve topic. See faculty feedback on what needs to be addressed.

No paper submitted or content missing

List a minimum of five scholarly, peer-reviewed articles that are relevant and appropriate to support your project. References must be scholarly, peer- reviewed articles, published within 10 years, and include the full version of the article. List references in APA format. 5%

Five relevant and appropriate peer- reviewed scholarly articles are listed. Articles are published within 10 years. References are listed in correct APA format.

Four relevant and appropriate peer- reviewed scholarly articles are listed. Articles are published within 10 years. References are listed in correct APA format.

Three or less relevant and appropriate peer- reviewed scholarly articles are listed. Information is missing, such as: some articles are not relevant or appropriate, articles are published over 10 years, reference list in not in APA format, some references are not peer-reviewed or scholarly articles.

Listed sources are not considered scholarly.

No scholarly resources referenced.

APA, Grammar, spelling, and punctuation 15%

No errors in APA, grammar, spelling, and punctuations.

One to two errors in APA, grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

Three to four errors in APA, grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

Five to six errors in APA, grammar, spelling and punctuation.

Seven or more errors in APA, spelling, and punctuation. The submission does not meet format guidelines.

A2_499.docx

ASSIGNMENT 2 Instructions:

Please use the grading rubric to create an outline of your assignment. Each section of the rubric should be a section of your final paper and could become the headings. Your assignment will be graded based on each element of the rubric. Compare each section of your paper with the rubric to ensure all elements are covered. Then, include an introduction and conclusion to tie the paper together. If you have any questions regarding the assignment please contact your instructor using the Course Help forum.

As a nursing leader you will have the opportunity to implement many proposals. This is an exercise to help you learn the processes or steps you will need for implementation. Utilizing assignment one, choose one of the program outcomes and develop a quality assurance/capstone project that you believe would be beneficial to your area of employment, or the profession of nursing in general.

In assignment 2 you will address the following points.

· the capstone project topic: Implement nurse to patient ratio of 8:1

· review of the literature to validate the importance of the project.

· Location for the proposed plan: Skilled nursing facilities (“Nursing homes”)

· three outcomes you plan to achieve.

· how the project will impact your workplace and your institution

· how the project will impact your nursing practice, your workplace and nursing as a profession

PROGRAM OUTCOMES:

Graduates of the BSN program will be able to: • Effectively lead and collaborate within diverse, interdisciplinary healthcare teams to enhance patient outcomes and operational efficiency. • Integrate research, scholarship, and evidenced-based innovation to enhance professional nursing practice. • Design and implement comprehensive health promotion and disease prevention strategies tailored to individuals, families, and communities with varying healthcare needs. • Integrate the highest standards of professional ethics, integrity, and accountability, leadership in clinical decision-making and patient advocacy. • Demonstrate the global citizen's role by examining contemporary health and illness problems

A2_Rubric.pdf

Assignment 2: Capstone Project: Project I Description: The baccalaureate graduate will participate in quality initiatives, recognizing that these are complex system issues, involving other members of the healthcare team. Course Competency(ies): 1, 2, 3, 4 QSEN Competency(ies): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 BSN Essential: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education Domain 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

Competency Mastery

100%

Proficient

85%

Acceptable

77%

Basic

70%

Deficient-Mastery

not Demonstrated

Develops a well- organized discussion and synthesis of the capstone project topic and purpose. Provide details of the issue or problem to be solved. Provides details to fully explain the importance of the project in 2-3 pages. 10%

Thoroughly provides an in-depth explanation of the chosen capstone project. Synthesizes the background of the problem and provides details to fully explain the issue or problem and the importance of the project.

Partially provides an explanation of the chosen capstone project using some detail to explain the issue or problem and the importance of the project.

Chosen capstone project contains little to no explanation with limited details for the issue or problem and the importance of the project.

Faculty does not approve topic. See faculty feedback on what needs to be addressed.

No paper submitted or content missing.

Include a minimum of five (5) scholarly, peer-reviewed articles to support your project.

5%

Five relevant and appropriate scholarly, peer- reviewed articles are included.

Four relevant and appropriate scholarly, peer- reviewed articles are included.

Three or less scholarly, peer- reviewed articles are included.

References are not from scholarly, peer- reviewed articles.

No references listed.

Articles are included on the reference page and cited in-text to support the discussion.

5%

Five or more articles are included on the reference page and cited in- text to support the discussion.

Four or more articles are included on the reference page and cited in-text to support the discussion.

At least three articles are included on the reference page and cited in-text to support the discussion.

Articles are listed on the reference page only or listed in- text only.

References are not relevant or appropriate for the topic.

No articles are included on the reference page or cited in any in-text references.

Develop a well- organized synthesis of the five articles and discuss how the literature will support the validity of the project.

Discuss evidence-based rationales to support the project.

2-3 paragraphs per article.

Label Headings as Article One, Article Two, etc.

10%

Completely develops a well- organized synthesis of the five articles and fully discusses how the literature will support the validity of the project. Discusses evidence-based rationales to support the project.

Partially develops a well-organized synthesis of the five articles and describes how the literature will support the validity of the project. Some information is missing or does not fully describe evidence-based rationales to support the project. Each article does not contain 2-3 paragraphs.

Synthesis of the five articles not developed, and description of how the literature will support the validity of the project is lacking details. Information is missing, vague, or does not describe evidence-based rationales to support the project. Each article does not contain 2-3 paragraphs.

Faculty does not approve topic. See faculty feedback on what needs to be addressed.

No paper submitted or content missing.

Identify a minimum of three (3) stakeholders necessary for the success of the project. Describe their role/title, authority to approve the project, methods to gain buy-in and support. 3-4 paragraphs per objective 10%

Includes three stakeholders and completely discusses how each is necessary for the success of the project. Describes the three roles/titles, authority to approve the project, and the methods to gain buy-in and support. Includes 3-4 paragraphs

Includes two stakeholders and completely discusses how each is necessary for the success of the project. Describes the two roles/titles, authority to approve the project, and the methods to gain buy-in and support. Includes 2-3 paragraphs

One or less stakeholders are identified. Details are vague or missing to describe necessity for the success of the project, roles/titles, authority to approve the project, and the methods to gain buy- in and support. Minimal discussion

Faculty does not approve topic. See faculty feedback on what needs to be addressed.

No paper submitted or content missing.

Identify and discuss two (2) potential barriers that could impact the successful implementation of your project. 2-3 paragraphs (minimum) 10%

Identifies and analyzes two potential barriers that could impact the successful implementation of the project. At least 2-3 paragraphs included.

Identifies and examines two potential barriers that could impact the successful implementation of the project. Less than 2 paragraphs included.

Vaguely summarizes two or less potential barriers that could impact the successful implementation of the project. Minimal discussion is provided.

Faculty does not approve topic. See faculty feedback on what needs to be addressed.

No paper submitted or content missing.

Identify and describe two (2) strategies that can be utilized to help overcome or reduce the barriers. 2-3 paragraphs (minimum) 10%

Identifies and analyzes two strategies that can be utilized to help overcome or reduce the barriers. At least 2-3 paragraphs included.

Identifies and examines two strategies that can be utilized to help overcome or reduce the barriers. Only one strategy included with complete discussion. Less than 2 paragraphs included.

Vaguely summarizes two or less strategies that can be utilized to help overcome or reduce the barriers. Information is missing or unclear. Minimal discussion.

Faculty does not approve topic. See faculty feedback on what needs to be addressed.

No paper submitted or content missing.

Provide in-depth discussion of the benefits and impact the project will have once implemented. Include citations for support. 2-3 paragraphs (minimum) 10%

Completely provides in-depth discussion of the benefits and impact the project will have once implemented. Includes citations for support. Includes 2-3 paragraphs (minimum)

Partially provides discussion of the benefits and impact the project will have once implemented. Includes citations for support. Includes 2-3 paragraphs (minimum)

Vaguely summarizes the benefits and impact the project will have once implemented. Does not include citations for support. Minimal discussion.

Faculty does not approve topic. See faculty feedback on what needs to be addressed.

No paper submitted or content missing.

Provide an in- depth discussion of a minimum of three (3) areas of focus in which the capstone project will impact the student’s personal practice. 2-3 paragraphs (minimum) 10%

Completely identifies and analyzes a minimum of three (3) areas of focus in which the capstone project will impact the student’s personal practice. 2-3 paragraphs (minimum)

Identifies and examines a minimum of three or less areas of focus in which the capstone project will impact the student’s personal practice. Only two areas of focus are included. Some details are missing. Two or less paragraphs.

Vaguely summarizes the details of area of focus in which the capstone project will impact the student’s personal practice. Details are missing. Two or less areas of focus are mentioned. Minimal discussion .

Faculty does not approve topic. See faculty feedback on what needs to be addressed.

No paper submitted or content missing

List a minimum of five scholarly, peer-reviewed articles that are relevant and appropriate to support your project. References must be scholarly, peer- reviewed articles, published within 10 years, and include the full version of the article. List references in APA format. 5%

Five relevant and appropriate peer- reviewed scholarly articles are listed. Articles are published within 10 years. References are listed in correct APA format.

Four relevant and appropriate peer- reviewed scholarly articles are listed. Articles are published within 10 years. References are listed in correct APA format.

Three or less relevant and appropriate peer- reviewed scholarly articles are listed. Information is missing, such as: some articles are not relevant or appropriate, articles are published over 10 years, reference list in not in APA format, some references are not peer-reviewed or scholarly articles.

Listed sources are not considered scholarly.

No scholarly resources referenced.

APA, Grammar, spelling, and punctuation 15%

No errors in APA, grammar, spelling, and punctuations.

One to two errors in APA, grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

Three to four errors in APA, grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

Five to six errors in APA, grammar, spelling and punctuation.

Seven or more errors in APA, spelling, and punctuation. The submission does not meet format guidelines.

A2_499.docx

ASSIGNMENT 2 Instructions:

Please use the grading rubric to create an outline of your assignment. Each section of the rubric should be a section of your final paper and could become the headings. Your assignment will be graded based on each element of the rubric. Compare each section of your paper with the rubric to ensure all elements are covered. Then, include an introduction and conclusion to tie the paper together. If you have any questions regarding the assignment please contact your instructor using the Course Help forum.

As a nursing leader you will have the opportunity to implement many proposals. This is an exercise to help you learn the processes or steps you will need for implementation. Utilizing assignment one, choose one of the program outcomes and develop a quality assurance/capstone project that you believe would be beneficial to your area of employment, or the profession of nursing in general.

In assignment 2 you will address the following points.

· the capstone project topic: Implement nurse to patient ratio of 8:1

· review of the literature to validate the importance of the project.

· Location for the proposed plan: Skilled nursing facilities (“Nursing homes”)

· three outcomes you plan to achieve.

· how the project will impact your workplace and your institution

· how the project will impact your nursing practice, your workplace and nursing as a profession

PROGRAM OUTCOMES:

Graduates of the BSN program will be able to: • Effectively lead and collaborate within diverse, interdisciplinary healthcare teams to enhance patient outcomes and operational efficiency. • Integrate research, scholarship, and evidenced-based innovation to enhance professional nursing practice. • Design and implement comprehensive health promotion and disease prevention strategies tailored to individuals, families, and communities with varying healthcare needs. • Integrate the highest standards of professional ethics, integrity, and accountability, leadership in clinical decision-making and patient advocacy. • Demonstrate the global citizen's role by examining contemporary health and illness problems

A2_Rubric.pdf

Assignment 2: Capstone Project: Project I Description: The baccalaureate graduate will participate in quality initiatives, recognizing that these are complex system issues, involving other members of the healthcare team. Course Competency(ies): 1, 2, 3, 4 QSEN Competency(ies): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 BSN Essential: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education Domain 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

Competency Mastery

100%

Proficient

85%

Acceptable

77%

Basic

70%

Deficient-Mastery

not Demonstrated

Develops a well- organized discussion and synthesis of the capstone project topic and purpose. Provide details of the issue or problem to be solved. Provides details to fully explain the importance of the project in 2-3 pages. 10%

Thoroughly provides an in-depth explanation of the chosen capstone project. Synthesizes the background of the problem and provides details to fully explain the issue or problem and the importance of the project.

Partially provides an explanation of the chosen capstone project using some detail to explain the issue or problem and the importance of the project.

Chosen capstone project contains little to no explanation with limited details for the issue or problem and the importance of the project.

Faculty does not approve topic. See faculty feedback on what needs to be addressed.

No paper submitted or content missing.

Include a minimum of five (5) scholarly, peer-reviewed articles to support your project.

5%

Five relevant and appropriate scholarly, peer- reviewed articles are included.

Four relevant and appropriate scholarly, peer- reviewed articles are included.

Three or less scholarly, peer- reviewed articles are included.

References are not from scholarly, peer- reviewed articles.

No references listed.

Articles are included on the reference page and cited in-text to support the discussion.

5%

Five or more articles are included on the reference page and cited in- text to support the discussion.

Four or more articles are included on the reference page and cited in-text to support the discussion.

At least three articles are included on the reference page and cited in-text to support the discussion.

Articles are listed on the reference page only or listed in- text only.

References are not relevant or appropriate for the topic.

No articles are included on the reference page or cited in any in-text references.

Develop a well- organized synthesis of the five articles and discuss how the literature will support the validity of the project.

Discuss evidence-based rationales to support the project.

2-3 paragraphs per article.

Label Headings as Article One, Article Two, etc.

10%

Completely develops a well- organized synthesis of the five articles and fully discusses how the literature will support the validity of the project. Discusses evidence-based rationales to support the project.

Partially develops a well-organized synthesis of the five articles and describes how the literature will support the validity of the project. Some information is missing or does not fully describe evidence-based rationales to support the project. Each article does not contain 2-3 paragraphs.

Synthesis of the five articles not developed, and description of how the literature will support the validity of the project is lacking details. Information is missing, vague, or does not describe evidence-based rationales to support the project. Each article does not contain 2-3 paragraphs.

Faculty does not approve topic. See faculty feedback on what needs to be addressed.

No paper submitted or content missing.

Identify a minimum of three (3) stakeholders necessary for the success of the project. Describe their role/title, authority to approve the project, methods to gain buy-in and support. 3-4 paragraphs per objective 10%

Includes three stakeholders and completely discusses how each is necessary for the success of the project. Describes the three roles/titles, authority to approve the project, and the methods to gain buy-in and support. Includes 3-4 paragraphs

Includes two stakeholders and completely discusses how each is necessary for the success of the project. Describes the two roles/titles, authority to approve the project, and the methods to gain buy-in and support. Includes 2-3 paragraphs

One or less stakeholders are identified. Details are vague or missing to describe necessity for the success of the project, roles/titles, authority to approve the project, and the methods to gain buy- in and support. Minimal discussion

Faculty does not approve topic. See faculty feedback on what needs to be addressed.

No paper submitted or content missing.

Identify and discuss two (2) potential barriers that could impact the successful implementation of your project. 2-3 paragraphs (minimum) 10%

Identifies and analyzes two potential barriers that could impact the successful implementation of the project. At least 2-3 paragraphs included.

Identifies and examines two potential barriers that could impact the successful implementation of the project. Less than 2 paragraphs included.

Vaguely summarizes two or less potential barriers that could impact the successful implementation of the project. Minimal discussion is provided.

Faculty does not approve topic. See faculty feedback on what needs to be addressed.

No paper submitted or content missing.

Identify and describe two (2) strategies that can be utilized to help overcome or reduce the barriers. 2-3 paragraphs (minimum) 10%

Identifies and analyzes two strategies that can be utilized to help overcome or reduce the barriers. At least 2-3 paragraphs included.

Identifies and examines two strategies that can be utilized to help overcome or reduce the barriers. Only one strategy included with complete discussion. Less than 2 paragraphs included.

Vaguely summarizes two or less strategies that can be utilized to help overcome or reduce the barriers. Information is missing or unclear. Minimal discussion.

Faculty does not approve topic. See faculty feedback on what needs to be addressed.

No paper submitted or content missing.

Provide in-depth discussion of the benefits and impact the project will have once implemented. Include citations for support. 2-3 paragraphs (minimum) 10%

Completely provides in-depth discussion of the benefits and impact the project will have once implemented. Includes citations for support. Includes 2-3 paragraphs (minimum)

Partially provides discussion of the benefits and impact the project will have once implemented. Includes citations for support. Includes 2-3 paragraphs (minimum)

Vaguely summarizes the benefits and impact the project will have once implemented. Does not include citations for support. Minimal discussion.

Faculty does not approve topic. See faculty feedback on what needs to be addressed.

No paper submitted or content missing.

Provide an in- depth discussion of a minimum of three (3) areas of focus in which the capstone project will impact the student’s personal practice. 2-3 paragraphs (minimum) 10%

Completely identifies and analyzes a minimum of three (3) areas of focus in which the capstone project will impact the student’s personal practice. 2-3 paragraphs (minimum)

Identifies and examines a minimum of three or less areas of focus in which the capstone project will impact the student’s personal practice. Only two areas of focus are included. Some details are missing. Two or less paragraphs.

Vaguely summarizes the details of area of focus in which the capstone project will impact the student’s personal practice. Details are missing. Two or less areas of focus are mentioned. Minimal discussion .

Faculty does not approve topic. See faculty feedback on what needs to be addressed.

No paper submitted or content missing

List a minimum of five scholarly, peer-reviewed articles that are relevant and appropriate to support your project. References must be scholarly, peer- reviewed articles, published within 10 years, and include the full version of the article. List references in APA format. 5%

Five relevant and appropriate peer- reviewed scholarly articles are listed. Articles are published within 10 years. References are listed in correct APA format.

Four relevant and appropriate peer- reviewed scholarly articles are listed. Articles are published within 10 years. References are listed in correct APA format.

Three or less relevant and appropriate peer- reviewed scholarly articles are listed. Information is missing, such as: some articles are not relevant or appropriate, articles are published over 10 years, reference list in not in APA format, some references are not peer-reviewed or scholarly articles.

Listed sources are not considered scholarly.

No scholarly resources referenced.

APA, Grammar, spelling, and punctuation 15%

No errors in APA, grammar, spelling, and punctuations.

One to two errors in APA, grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

Three to four errors in APA, grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

Five to six errors in APA, grammar, spelling and punctuation.

Seven or more errors in APA, spelling, and punctuation. The submission does not meet format guidelines.

Professional Development Plan (PDP) Part 2

A2_499.docx

A2_Rubric.pdf

A2_499.docx

A2_Rubric.pdf

A2_499.docx