Prevention Health Campaign

…

9/9/26, 10:36 AM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 - DNP875 Sect1 Population Health and Person-Centered Care - Aspe…

Criteria

Does Not Meet

0

%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criteria

Does Not Meet

0

%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1

Course: DNP875 Sect1 Population Health and Person-Centered Care

Criteria

Does Not Meet

0

%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criterion Score

Introduction

/Thesis

Weight:

%

10

/ 10

Quality of

Information

or Evidence

Weight:

%

25

/ 25

0

points

Weak or no in

-

troduction of

topic. Purpose

is

unclear/thesis

is weak or

missing.

7

points

Basic introduc

-

tion that states

topic but lacks

interest. Thesis

is somewhat

clear and

arguable.

8

points

Proficient in

-

troduction that

is interesting

and states

topic. Thesis is

clear and ar

-

guable state

-

ment of

position.

10

points

Exceptional in

-

troduction that

grabs interest

of reader and

states topic;

Thesis is ex

-

ceptionally

clear, arguable,

well-devel

-

oped, and a de

-

finitive

statement.

0

points

Information

has little or

nothing to do

with the thesis.

Information

has weak or no

connection to

the thesis.

17.5

points

Information re

-

lates to the

main topic, but

few details

and/or exam

-

ples are given.

Indicates a lim

-

ited variety of

sources.

20

points

Information re

-

lates to the

main topic.

Paper is re

-

searched in

sufficient detail

and from a va

-

riety of

sources. All

necessary con

-

tent is

included.

25

points

Paper is excep

-

tionally re

-

searched, ex

-

tremely de

-

tailed, and ac

-

curate.

Information

clearly relates

to the thesis.

Appropriate

content is cov

-

ered in depth

without being

redundant.

Criterion Score

Support of

Thesis/Anal

ysis Weight:

%

20

/ 20

Organizatio

n/

Developme

nt of Thesis

Weight:

15

%

/ 15

Conclusion

Weight: 5%

/ 5

0

points

Limited or no

connections

made between

evidence and

thesis. Lacks

analysis.

points

14

Some connec

-

tions have

been made be

-

tween evi

-

dence and the

-

sis, though

they may be

tenuous.

Minimal analy

-

sis is evident,

but may not

provide needed

support for

thesis.

16

points

Consistent

connections

made between

evidence and

thesis. Analysis

sufficiently

supports

thesis.

points

20

Exceptionally

critical, rele

-

vant, and con

-

sistent connec

-

tions made be

-

tween evi

-

dence and the

-

sis. Excellent

analysis is

evident.

0

points

Lacks develop

-

ment of ideas

with weak or

no transitions

between and

within

paragraphs.

10.5

points

Somewhat

clear develop

-

ment, though

perhaps illogi

-

cal, with basic

transitions be

-

tween and

within

paragraphs.

12

points

Clear and logi

-

cal order that

supports thesis

with appropri

-

ate transitions

between and

within

paragraphs.

points

15

Exceptionally

clear, logical,

mature, and

thorough de

-

velopment of

thesis with ex

-

cellent transi

-

tions between

and within

paragraphs.

points

0

Lacks a sum

-

mary of topic.

Conclusions

missing or

irrelevant.

3.5

points

Basic summary

of topic with

-

out final con

-

cluding ideas.

Inappropriately

introduces new

information.

4

points

Good summary

of topic with

credible con

-

cluding ideas.

Introduces no

new

information.

points

5

Excellent sum

-

mary of topic

with succinct

and precise

concluding

ideas that im

-

pact reader.

Criterion Score

Quality of

Written

Communica

tion Weight:

15

%

/ 15

0

points

Style and voice

inappropriate

or do not ad

-

dress given au

-

dience, pur

-

pose, etc.

Word choice is

excessively re

-

dundant,

clichéd, and

unspecific.

Inconsistent

grammar, spell

-

ing, punctua

-

tion, and para

-

graphing.

Surface errors

are pervasive

enough that

they impede

communication

of meaning.

points

10.5

Style and voice

are somewhat

appropriate to

given audience

and purpose.

Word choice is

often unspe

-

cific, generic,

redundant, and

clichéd.

Repetitive me

-

chanical errors

distract the

reader.

Inconsistencies

in language,

sentence struc

-

ture, and/or

word choice

are present.

points

12

Style and voice

are appropriate

to the given

audience and

purpose. Word

choice is spe

-

cific and pur

-

poseful, and

somewhat var

-

ied throughout.

Minimal me

-

chanical or ty

-

pographical er

-

rors are

present, but

are not overly

distracting to

the reader.

Correct sen

-

tence structure

and audience-

appropriate

language are

used.

points

15

Style and voice

are not only

appropriate to

the given audi

-

ence and pur

-

pose, but also

show original

-

ity and creativ

-

ity. Word

choice is spe

-

cific, purpose

-

ful, dynamic

and varied.

Free of me

-

chanical and

typographical

errors. A vari

-

ety of sentence

structures and

effective fig

-

ures of speech

are used.

Writer is

clearly in com

-

mand of stan

-

dard, written,

academic

English.

Total

/ 100

Criterion Score

APA Format

Weight:

%

10

/ 10

0

points

APA format

and style are

not evident.

7

points

Missing APA el

-

ements; in-text

citations,

where neces

-

sary, are used

but formatted

inaccurately

and not

referenced.

8

points

All key ele

-

ments of an

APA title page

are present; In-

text citations

and a reference

page are

present with

few format er

-

rors.

Mechanics of

writing are re

-

flective of APA

style.

points

10

A broad under

-

standing of

APA format

and style is evi

-

dent. Accurate

citations and

references are

presented. No

APA errors are

evident.

Overall Score

Level 1

0

points minimum

Level 2

70

points minimum

Level 3

80

points minimum

Level 4

100

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/121488/viewContent/6459337/View 1/4

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/121488/viewContent/6459337/View 1/4

1/4

…

9/9/26, 10:36 AM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 - DNP875 Sect1 Population Health and Person-Centered Care - Aspe…

Criteria

Does Not Meet

0

%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criteria

Does Not Meet

0

%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1

Course: DNP875 Sect1 Population Health and Person-Centered Care

Criteria

Does Not Meet

0

%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criterion Score

Introduction

/Thesis

Weight:

%

10

/ 10

Quality of

Information

or Evidence

Weight:

%

25

/ 25

0

points

Weak or no in

-

troduction of

topic. Purpose

is

unclear/thesis

is weak or

missing.

7

points

Basic introduc

-

tion that states

topic but lacks

interest. Thesis

is somewhat

clear and

arguable.

8

points

Proficient in

-

troduction that

is interesting

and states

topic. Thesis is

clear and ar

-

guable state

-

ment of

position.

10

points

Exceptional in

-

troduction that

grabs interest

of reader and

states topic;

Thesis is ex

-

ceptionally

clear, arguable,

well-devel

-

oped, and a de

-

finitive

statement.

0

points

Information

has little or

nothing to do

with the thesis.

Information

has weak or no

connection to

the thesis.

17.5

points

Information re

-

lates to the

main topic, but

few details

and/or exam

-

ples are given.

Indicates a lim

-

ited variety of

sources.

20

points

Information re

-

lates to the

main topic.

Paper is re

-

searched in

sufficient detail

and from a va

-

riety of

sources. All

necessary con

-

tent is

included.

25

points

Paper is excep

-

tionally re

-

searched, ex

-

tremely de

-

tailed, and ac

-

curate.

Information

clearly relates

to the thesis.

Appropriate

content is cov

-

ered in depth

without being

redundant.

Criterion Score

Support of

Thesis/Anal

ysis Weight:

%

20

/ 20

Organizatio

n/

Developme

nt of Thesis

Weight:

15

%

/ 15

Conclusion

Weight: 5%

/ 5

0

points

Limited or no

connections

made between

evidence and

thesis. Lacks

analysis.

points

14

Some connec

-

tions have

been made be

-

tween evi

-

dence and the

-

sis, though

they may be

tenuous.

Minimal analy

-

sis is evident,

but may not

provide needed

support for

thesis.

16

points

Consistent

connections

made between

evidence and

thesis. Analysis

sufficiently

supports

thesis.

points

20

Exceptionally

critical, rele

-

vant, and con

-

sistent connec

-

tions made be

-

tween evi

-

dence and the

-

sis. Excellent

analysis is

evident.

0

points

Lacks develop

-

ment of ideas

with weak or

no transitions

between and

within

paragraphs.

10.5

points

Somewhat

clear develop

-

ment, though

perhaps illogi

-

cal, with basic

transitions be

-

tween and

within

paragraphs.

12

points

Clear and logi

-

cal order that

supports thesis

with appropri

-

ate transitions

between and

within

paragraphs.

points

15

Exceptionally

clear, logical,

mature, and

thorough de

-

velopment of

thesis with ex

-

cellent transi

-

tions between

and within

paragraphs.

points

0

Lacks a sum

-

mary of topic.

Conclusions

missing or

irrelevant.

3.5

points

Basic summary

of topic with

-

out final con

-

cluding ideas.

Inappropriately

introduces new

information.

4

points

Good summary

of topic with

credible con

-

cluding ideas.

Introduces no

new

information.

points

5

Excellent sum

-

mary of topic

with succinct

and precise

concluding

ideas that im

-

pact reader.

Criterion Score

Quality of

Written

Communica

tion Weight:

15

%

/ 15

0

points

Style and voice

inappropriate

or do not ad

-

dress given au

-

dience, pur

-

pose, etc.

Word choice is

excessively re

-

dundant,

clichéd, and

unspecific.

Inconsistent

grammar, spell

-

ing, punctua

-

tion, and para

-

graphing.

Surface errors

are pervasive

enough that

they impede

communication

of meaning.

points

10.5

Style and voice

are somewhat

appropriate to

given audience

and purpose.

Word choice is

often unspe

-

cific, generic,

redundant, and

clichéd.

Repetitive me

-

chanical errors

distract the

reader.

Inconsistencies

in language,

sentence struc

-

ture, and/or

word choice

are present.

points

12

Style and voice

are appropriate

to the given

audience and

purpose. Word

choice is spe

-

cific and pur

-

poseful, and

somewhat var

-

ied throughout.

Minimal me

-

chanical or ty

-

pographical er

-

rors are

present, but

are not overly

distracting to

the reader.

Correct sen

-

tence structure

and audience-

appropriate

language are

used.

points

15

Style and voice

are not only

appropriate to

the given audi

-

ence and pur

-

pose, but also

show original

-

ity and creativ

-

ity. Word

choice is spe

-

cific, purpose

-

ful, dynamic

and varied.

Free of me

-

chanical and

typographical

errors. A vari

-

ety of sentence

structures and

effective fig

-

ures of speech

are used.

Writer is

clearly in com

-

mand of stan

-

dard, written,

academic

English.

Total

/ 100

Criterion Score

APA Format

Weight:

%

10

/ 10

0

points

APA format

and style are

not evident.

7

points

Missing APA el

-

ements; in-text

citations,

where neces

-

sary, are used

but formatted

inaccurately

and not

referenced.

8

points

All key ele

-

ments of an

APA title page

are present; In-

text citations

and a reference

page are

present with

few format er

-

rors.

Mechanics of

writing are re

-

flective of APA

style.

points

10

A broad under

-

standing of

APA format

and style is evi

-

dent. Accurate

citations and

references are

presented. No

APA errors are

evident.

Overall Score

Level 1

0

points minimum

Level 2

70

points minimum

Level 3

80

points minimum

Level 4

100

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/121488/viewContent/6459337/View 1/4

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/121488/viewContent/6459337/View 1/4

1/4