Powerpoint

profileAaliyahbanks74

please read instructions clearly and rubric!

  • 2 years ago
  • 12
files (5)

Updated_Kaltura_Article_Summary_Presentation_RubricMathClassesFall2024.docx

Kaltura Article Summary Video Presentation Assignment Rubric

Criteria

Exemplar (100 pts)

Proficient (85 pts)

Needs Improvement (70 pts)

Does Not Meet (50 pts or below)

Article Selection and Introduction (10%)

Selects a post-2010 article on a P-5 math topic from an NCTM journal; provides a clear, concise introduction with purpose, author’s intent, intended audience, and a simple article overview.

Follows article selection criteria and includes a mostly clear introduction covering purpose, intent, and audience but may lack minor details in overview clarity.

Partially meets article selection criteria; introduction lacks detail, missing key information on purpose or audience.

Does not meet article criteria or introduction is unclear and lacks purpose information.

Summary of Main Ideas (30%)

Provides a comprehensive summary of the article’s main ideas, clearly articulating key points, examples, and relevant concepts, demonstrating in-depth understanding.

Summarizes most main ideas well, using some examples or concepts to support understanding, but lacks thoroughness in a few areas.

Covers some main points but lacks clarity, examples, or necessary details that would demonstrate full understanding.

Summary lacks coherence, missing most main ideas or examples from the article.

Analytical Reflection and Conclusion (20%)

Addresses both required questions thoroughly: (1) how the article’s ideas will assist in teaching elementary students a specific topic or strategy, with specific examples; and (2) how these ideas/strategies can improve student understanding, with clear comparisons to other strategies or prior learning. Uses strong examples directly from the article.

Reflects on article strategies with some detail on their teaching impact and student understanding, answering both questions but with limited examples or comparisons.

Provides general reflections on article strategies but lacks specific examples or clarity in answering both questions.

Conclusion lacks clarity, fails to answer one or both questions, or lacks necessary support and examples.

Presentation Structure & Delivery (10%)

Creates a 7-10 minute embedded Kaltura Capture video with 5-7 slides, maintaining clear visual presence (face on video). Presentation flows logically with concise explanations and examples.

Completes a 7-10 minute embedded video with 5-7 slides, providing examples but may have minor gaps in visual engagement or logical flow.

Video time slightly exceeds or is under the limit; slides lack cohesion, and visual presence is inconsistent.

Video is not within the time requirements; lacks structure, visual presence, or clarity.

Visual Aids and Text Usage (10%)

Includes effective visuals from the article (e.g., diagrams/charts) that enhance understanding, with text kept brief and purposeful to avoid excessive wordiness.

Includes visuals from the article and follows text conciseness guidelines, though some slides may be wordy or slightly cluttered.

Limited visuals, from the article and slides are somewhat cluttered or text-heavy, impacting presentation clarity.

Lacks visuals from the article or has excessive text that detracts significantly from clarity and engagement.

Citations and Academic Integrity (10%)

All summarized or paraphrased information on slides includes proper APA citations; citations enhance credibility and academic integrity throughout.

Most summarized content on slides includes citations, but may miss a few minor details in formatting or coverage.

Some summarized or paraphrased content lacks citations, reducing academic integrity and credibility of the presentation.

Does not cite summarized or paraphrased information, violating academic integrity standards.

Submission Requirements (10%)

Submission includes all required elements (PDF copy of the article, PPT file, embedded Kaltura Capture video, and all accurate file names with name in title.

Meets most core submission requirements with correct file formats but may have minor format or naming errors.

Missing core submission requirements or incorrectly formatted files.

Incomplete submission or incorrect file formats that hinder access to required components.