Poster
10 months ago
10
PSY-495-RS-T8-PosterTemplate.pptx
PSY-495Rubric-PosterPresentation.pdf
- FinalPoster.PNG
PSY-495-RS-T8-PosterTemplate.pptx
Title of Research Proposal
Presenter Name
Grand Canyon University, Phoenix Arizona
Purpose and Problem
Methodology
Theoretical Framework
Ethical Considerations
Literature Review
References
.
.
To start using this template, you first need to delete this content and any other unwanted contents of this page. Keep the poster title and the purple section headers.
The purple headers are used to identify and separate the main topics of your presentation. The most commonly used headers in poster presentations are provided, but you can change these headers to fit your proposal
Move the header copies approximately to where you think they need to be on the poster, so you can get a better sense of the overall poster layout. It will help you organize your content. You can now start adding your text. To add text use the text tool to draw a text box starting from the left edge of a column to the right edge and start typing in your text. You can also paste the text you may have already copied from another source Repeat the process throughout the poster as needed.
Conclusion and Implications
Research Question and Hypotheses
TEMPLATE DESIGN © 2008
www.PosterPresentations.com
image1.tif
PSY-495Rubric-PosterPresentation.pdf
Poster Presentation - Rubric
Poster Presentation 90 points
Criteria Description
Create a poster that you could present professionally. Use attached document “Poster
Template.” Upload your revised and updated poster for presentation.
5. Target 90 points
The submission is presented effectively, and all of the required elements creatively
contribute to the presentation of the concepts.
4. Acceptable 76.5 points
The submission is presented effectively and contains all of the required elements.
3. Approaching 67.5 points
The submission contains minor inconsistencies that are not overly distracting.
Presentation contains a majority of the required elements.
2. Insufficient 58.5 points
The submission is ineffective, contains multiple inconsistencies, or is missing a few
of the required elements.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The submission is incoherent, contains major inconsistencies, is not presented
effectively, or is missing a substantial amount of the required elements.
Collapse All
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Mechanics of Writing 5 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence
structure, etc.
5. Target 5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence
structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable 4.25 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
structure are used.
3. Approaching 3.75 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally
appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient 3.25 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language
choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language
choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Format/Documentation 5 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;
documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target 5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
4. Acceptable 4.25 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching 3.75 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious
errors.
2. Insufficient 3.25 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors
in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Total 100 points
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
- Can you alphabetize and complete my reference pages for literature review?
- bagel practice app
- See Description
- need urgent help
- Risk Assessment : Address identified issues with project and identify the approriated recommendations and solutions
- FIN 515 Week 3 First Course Project (Finacial Management: eBay and Amazon)
- weighing evidence
- ucerfy discussions completed
- human resources management home work
- THE THINK TANK