PLAGIARISM FREE "A" WORK IN 12 HOURS
2 years ago
30
ECE660Week2ActionResearchProposalLiteratureEvaluationTemplate.pdf
ECE660Week2ActionResearchProposalLiteratureEvaluationTemplate.doc
ECE660Week2ActionResearchProposalLiteratureEvaluationTemplate.pdf
Using the ECE660 Week 2 Action Research Proposal Literature Evaluation
Template (ATTACHED) similar to the one you used in the discussion this week,
complete the below requirements. Keep in mind, in your final action research
proposal, you will convert the information you added to the tables in the template
into paragraph form.
• Select two scholarly, credible, or peer-reviewed full-text articles related to
your area of focus and research questions.
o You may use the article you reviewed in the discussion this week as
one of the two resources required for review and evaluation.
• Summarize your area of focus and the associated problem statement or
situation for your action research proposal.
• Restate your research question.
Part 1: Article Summary Tables
For each of the two articles, complete one table with the following information
below. Each section must be completed and relevant information related to the
article.
• CRAAP Test: Evaluate each article for currency, relevancy, authority,
accuracy, and purpose.
o Provide the overall score and a narrative with a summary of your
evaluation.
• Title, Author, Year: Provide an accurate title, author, and year of publication.
• RefWorks Link: Include the link to the location of the article saved in your
RefWorks account.
• Purpose of the Study: Explain the purpose of the study.
• Subject/Participants: Discuss the subjects or participants involved in the
study.
• Variables: Identify the independent and dependent variables in the study.
• Quantitative and/or Qualitative Instruments: Examine the instruments used
to collect data, including any pertinent information on the validity and
reliability of the instruments.
• Interventions: Summarize the interventions used in the study to improve a
situation or existing challenge that the research addressed.
• Outcomes/Results: Explain what kind of evidence is used to support his/her
claims.
• Implications: Examine the implications and conclusions of the study.
• Relevance to Proposed Study: Appraise how the study relates to the
challenge or situation you are interested in improving in your action research
proposal.
Part 2: Literature Evaluation Table
Complete the summary table after completing each of the article summary tables.
The purpose of this table is for you to synthesize information from the articles you
reviewed to determine how each one will inform your own action research
proposal, specifically focusing in the interventions and qualitative and quantitative
instruments.
• Literature Evaluation Table: Use the literature evaluation table to organize
your decisions regarding which interventions and instruments are the most
relevant to your own action research proposal, based on your two article
summaries.
Part 3: Relevance, Terms and Application
• Identify one early childhood theory that could be used to support your
proposal.
• Define research related terms.
• Describe what intervention you would suggest and why.
Research and Resource Expectations
• A minimum of two scholarly, credible or peer-reviewed sources, in addition
to the course textbook, are required.
Next Steps
• Review your assignment with the Grading Rubric to ensure you have
achieved the distinguished levels of performance for each criterion. Submit
the assignment for evaluation no later than Day 7.
The Action Research Proposal: Literature Evaluation paper
• Must be six double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references
pages) and formatted according to APA Style.
ECE660Week2ActionResearchProposalLiteratureEvaluationTemplate.doc
|
ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSAL - LITERATURE EVALUATION |
1 |
|
ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSAL - LITERATURE EVALUATION |
PAGE |
Action Research Proposal - Literature Evaluation
[First name] [Last name]
University of Arizona Global Campus
ECE660: Action Research and Inquiry in Education
[Instructor's Name]
[Due Date]
Action Research Proposal - Literature Evaluation
Article Summary Table #1
Table 1
Article Evaluation Table
|
Title |
|
|
Author |
|
|
Year |
|
|
RefWorks Link Include the link to the location of the article saved in your Refworks account. |
|
|
CRAAP Test Evaluate the article using the What is CRAAP? test. |
|
|
Purpose and Main Points Summarize the purpose and main points of the article. |
|
|
Subjects or Participants (Explain the participants of the study.) |
|
|
Variables (What are the independent and dependent variables in this study?) |
|
|
Instruments (Examine the instruments used to collect data, include any pertinent information on the validity and reliability of the instruments). |
|
|
Quantitative ( i.e., test scores, rating scales, rubrics, statistics, teacher-made tests, report cards, attendance statistics, attitude scales, etc.). If quantitative instruments are not used in this study, please state this in your summary of this section. |
|
|
Qualitative (i.e., surveys, questionnaires, portfolios, exhibits, interviews, observation, visual recordings, photography, oral histories or stories, journals, anecdotal notes, researcher journal, etc.) If qualitative instruments are not used in this study, please state this in your summary of this section. |
|
|
Intervention(s) Used in this Study (Summarize what was done to improve a situation or existing challenge that the research addressed.) |
|
|
Outcomes or Results (Explain what kind of evidence used to support his/her claims – i.e. statistics, charts, stories, historical documents, etc.) |
|
|
Implications (Based on the results of the study, what conclusions can be drawn?) |
|
|
Relevance to Proposed Study Explain how the information presented is relevant to your action research proposal, specifically your area of focus and research question.
|
|
Article Summary Table #2
Table 2
Article Evaluation Table
|
Title |
|
|
Author |
|
|
Year |
|
|
RefWorks Link Include the link to the location of the article saved in your Refworks account. |
|
|
CRAAP Test Evaluate the article using the What is CRAAP? test. |
|
|
Purpose and Main Points Summarize the purpose and main points of the article. |
|
|
Subjects or Participants (Explain the participants of the study.) |
|
|
Variables (What are the independent and dependent variables in this study?) |
|
|
Instruments (Examine the instruments used to collect data, include any pertinent information on the validity and reliability of the instruments). |
|
|
Quantitative ( i.e., test scores, rating scales, rubrics, statistics, teacher-made tests, report cards, attendance statistics, attitude scales, etc.). If quantitative instruments are not used in this study, please state this in your summary of this section. |
|
|
Qualitative (i.e., surveys, questionnaires, portfolios, exhibits, interviews, observation, visual recordings, photography, oral histories or stories, journals, anecdotal notes, researcher journal, etc.) If qualitative instruments are not used in this study, please state this in your summary of this section. |
|
|
Intervention(s) Used in this Study (Summarize what was done to improve a situation or existing challenge that the research addressed.) |
|
|
Outcomes or Results (Explain what kind of evidence used to support his/her claims – i.e. statistics, charts, stories, historical documents, etc.) |
|
|
Implications (Based on the results of the study, what conclusions can be drawn?) |
|
|
Relevance to Proposed Study Explain how the information presented is relevant to your action research proposal, specifically your area of focus and research question.
|
|
Literature Evaluation Table
Table 3
Literature Evaluation Summary
|
|
Title/Author |
Year |
How will this article inform your action research proposal? Describe the intervention(s) and/or instruments that are relevant to the problem you are addressing with your action research. |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
Relevance, Terms and Application
References
- A+ Answers
- Week 8 Homework Assignment Set 4
- Security and risk are clearly related; the more at-risk a system or data set is the more security is desirable to protect it. Discuss how prices for security products may be tied to the degree of risk.Will people or orgs be willing to pay more if the risk
- Building on what you wrote in Part 1 last week, locate, read, and write about the research and findings in...
- it210_appendix_a
- MKT 421 Week 4 Learning Team Assignment Marketing Plan Phase III
- PROF XAVIER - Business Model & Strategic Plan PART 1 paper
- NTC 362 Week 3 Individual Integrative Network Design Project Part 2
- Soc 203 - Can Anyone Honestly Guarantee me an A+?
- Marketing Assignment