PICOT Sources review
Tasheezy
12 hours ago
40
files (4)PICOTQuestion.docx
BSN355LitReviewTemplate1.docx
BSN355_Literature_Review_Checklist1.docx
CapstoneRubric.docx
PICOTQuestion.docx
PICOT Question
In patients undergoing surgical procedures, will preoperative skin cleansing with chlorhexidine compared to the current practice, number of surgical site infections by 30% within 7days after surgery?
BSN355LitReviewTemplate1.docx
1
2
For the title page, follow the guidelines below. Information without brackets should remain as written. The learner should replace the information within the brackets with the requested information, and all prior information and brackets should be removed.
Literature Review
[Remove brackets & insert Your Full Name Here]
Nightingale College
[Remove brackets & insert Your Course Number, Section & Course Title]
[Remove brackets & insert Your instructor’s name using Professor or Dr. ________]
[Remove brackets & insert Month, Day, Year – this is the date the assignment is due, not the date it is submitted]
Prior to submitting your paper, make sure to remove all instructions in brackets on the following pages.
Literature Review
[ The introduction to the paper must be at least 5 sentences with 1 in-text citation, a fully stated purpose statement, and PICOT Question. In this section, introduce the topic to the reader. Indicate why the selected topic is important and why it is important to conduct a literature review as part of the project. Make sure the PICOT question is written as a quality improvement question, not a research question and that it contains all components of “PICOT”. End this section stating, "The purpose of this paper is ... "]
Project Proposal Topic
[ The project proposal section must be at least 1 fully formed paragraph (at least 5 sentences in length) with in-text citations. In this section, present an overview of the topic by discussing the topic in general. Consider providing some background information and describing the gap (current practice versus best practice) in nursing practice that was identified. Consider using statistics here to reinforce the point.]
Methods of Searching
[ This section must be at least 1 fully formed paragraph (at least 5 sentences in length).This section should describe how the literature search was conducted. For example: “A literature review was conducted using both electronic and manual resources…” Describe how the search for literature was conducted by explaining what databases or search engines were used to find the peer-reviewed articles. Describe what keywords were used; what date range was used to obtain the most current information (remember they must be less than 5 years old); what things were excluded (example: blogs, websites with biased information, etc).]
Review of the Literature
[ There must be at least 5 fully formed paragraphs (at least 5 sentences in length) with 5 in-text citations that correlate with the current, peer-reviewed references used. This will be the bulk of the review. Organization of the material here is important. In one paragraph for each of the 5 current, peer-reviewed articles, elaborate on the relation to the project topic/PICOT question, as well as what best practices were identified. Integrate key details of each article, demonstrating a clear understanding of the content reviewed. Consider the main takeaways after reading each article as they relate to the project project/intervention. This section should outline details of each article and also include the learner’s insight as they relate to the project and PICOT. Also include any other pertinent information about the topic that was discussed in the articles chosen.]
Findings
[ This section must be at least 2 fully formed paragraphs (at least 5 sentences in length) with in-text citations. In this section, provide a summary of the most significant findings found in the “Review of the Literature” section. Identify strengths and weaknesses of the literature (for example, small sample sizes that limit the validity of the findings or conclusions that you disagree with as an evaluator); and identify any gaps in the literature found. Begin with “The literature has shown…”]
Conclusion
[ The section should be at least 1 paragraph (at least 5 sentences in length), summarize at least 3 key points, and contain at least 1 in-text citation. Provide a thorough summary with at least 3 key points. Although not required, it is suggested learners restate the PICOT question in this section, so the reader is drawn to refocus on the topic/question.]
References
[There must be at least 5 current (within the last 5 years), peer-reviewed references. Use APA-7 formatting specific to reference type, including (but not limited to) alphabetical order and hanging indent. Specific reference examples have been discussed in the webinars.]
BSN355_Literature_Review_Checklist1.docx
BSN 355 Literature Review
Quick-Reference Checklist
Use this checklist to make sure your Literature Review assignment meets all requirements before submission.
|
Section |
Length |
Must Include |
|
Title Page |
— |
Standard title page elements; APA-7 format: right-aligned page number; title 3–4 lines down, centered; double-spaced; date written long-form (no "st"/"th"); page numbers top-right on every page |
|
Literature Review (Intro) |
1 paragraph, > 5 sentences per ¶; at least 1 citation |
Why the topic matters, why a lit review is done, correctly written quality improvement PICOT question (correct format with changes made based on previous instructor feedback), purpose statement (purpose of the paper, not the project) |
|
Project Proposal Topic |
1 paragraph, > 5 sentences per ¶; intext citations |
Topic overview, background information about the topic, current vs. best practice gap, cited statistics |
|
Methods of Searching |
1 paragraph, > 5 sentences per ¶ |
Databases used, keywords, date range (less than 5 years old), inclusion/exclusion criteria |
|
Review of the Literature |
5 paragraphs, > 5 sentences per ¶; 1 citation per > 5 ¶ |
One recent peer-reviewed article (5 years or newer) per paragraph (non-peer-reviewed/older than 5 years will not be accepted in this section); at least 5 sources; integrate key details of each article and demonstrate a clear understanding of the content; summarize each article findings plus relevance to PICOT |
|
Findings |
2 paragraphs, > 5 sentences per ¶; intext citations |
Summarize key findings across all 5 articles; synthesize strengths, weaknesses, and gaps |
|
Conclusion |
1 paragraph, > 5 sentences per ¶; 1 intext citation |
At least 3 key points, summarizes the project and ties back to literature, restates PICOT |
|
Reference List |
5 current (within 5 years), peer-reviewed sources |
Separate page, alphabetized, handing indent for each reference, double-space throughout, all references in APA-7 format based on type of reference; working links (DOIs or hyperlinks) |
Before You Submit
☐ Read your paper aloud — catch 3rd-person slips, missing citations, and paragraph length issues
☐ Confirm every in-text citation has a matching reference list entry
☐ Confirm your PICOT is correct/approved before pasting it into this paper — an incorrect PICOT costs 10 points automatically
☐ Double-check all sources are within the last 5 years, are peer-reviewed and the DOI/hyperlink is functional/accessible
☐ This assignment may be submitted only once — make sure your final draft is truly ready before uploading
BSN 355 Capstone Proposal — Week 6 Literature Review Assignment
CapstoneRubric.docx
BSN355 Capstone Literature Review 2026-1
|
BSN355 Capstone Literature Review 2026-1 |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntentional Learning and Reflection |
15 ptsExemplary(15 pts) Identifies and addresses a meaningful quality improvement opportunity, presenting a clear purpose statement and PICOT question that guides the content in an engaging and thought provoking- manner. The PICOT question clearly and concisely articulates the improvement aim or practice change focus and remains- the central focal point throughout the presentation. Demonstrates a strong understanding of the quality issue and provides a careful, critical analysis of contributing factors, current practices, and proposed improvement strategies. 10 ptsAccomplished(10 pts) Identifies and addresses a relevant quality improvement opportunity and presents a clear purpose statement and PICOT question that provide adequate direction for the content. The PICOT question outlines the improvement aim or practice change- focus and generally remains the focal point throughout the paper. Demonstrates an understanding of the quality issue and provides general critical analysis of contributing factors, current processes, and potential improvement strategies. 5 ptsDeveloping(5 pts) Identifies a quality improvement issue, though the focus may be too broad and/or the purpose statement OR PICOT question lack clarity and require further development. The central improvement aim is not consistently maintained throughout the paper. Demonstrates a basic understanding of the quality issue with limited critical analysis of contributing factors, current processes, or potential improvement strategies. Summarizes different approaches, barriers, or alternative solutions but does not yet deeply explore their implications for practice or outcomes. 0 ptsUnsatisfactory – Beginning( 0 pts) Fails to identify a relevant quality improvement issue, or the issue is not clearly defined and the paper lacks consistent focus throughout. The PICOT question is not present. Demonstrates a lack of understanding of the quality problem and provides inadequate analysis of contributing factors, current processes, or potential improvement strategies. Discussion remains superficial, relying on personal opinions or preferences rather than data informed, -system based critical analysis-. |
15 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDecision Making and Clinical Reasoning |
15 ptsExemplary(15 pts) Provides five current, peer-reviewed sources that present accurate, distinguishing evidence and effectively integrate the main concept into the assignment. Sources are relevant, accurate, current (less than 5 years old) and reliable, reflecting and validating the strength of the content. 10 ptsAccomplished(10 pts) Provides evidence to support the main concept. There are at least 5 sources, however, there are not at least 5 sources that are peer-reviewed and current (less than 5 years). 5 ptsDeveloping(5 pts) Provides evidence to support the main concept with less than 5 adequate and permissible (current/less than 5 years old and peer-reviewed) sources 0 ptsUnsatisfactory – Beginning(0 pts) There are no sources or the sources in the submission are not aligned with the reference list. |
15 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization & Presentation |
15 ptsExemplary(15 pts) Ideas are organized logically, flows smoothly, and with an effective progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes all required components (introduction, body, conclusion, citations, references, etc) 10 ptsAccomplished(10 pts) Ideas are organized with progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. The progression may flow awkwardly and be difficult to follow at times but is generally understandable. Includes all required components (introduction, body, conclusion, citations, references, etc.). 5 ptsDeveloping(5 pts) Ideas may not flow well and/or connect to the central position. The lack of logical progression diminishes understanding. Or may be missing a required component and/or components (introduction, body, conclusion, citations, references, etc.) are less than complete. 0 ptsUnsatisfactory – Beginning( 0 pts) Content lacks logical organization and impedes readers’ comprehension of ideas. For a paper, central position is not evident, or the paper is missing multiple required components (introduction, body, conclusion, citations, references, etc.). |
15 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting and APA Formatting |
15 ptsExemplary(15 pts) Content is well written and uses standard English characterized by elements of a strong writing style. Basically, free from grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, or formatting errors. APA guidelines for formatting are consistently followed. 10 ptsAccomplished(10 pts) Content shows above average writing style and clarity in writing using standard English. Minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, and/or formatting are noted. APA guidelines for formatting are mostly followed. 5 ptsDeveloping(5 pts) Content shows an average and/or casual writing style using standard English. Some errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and word usage. Use of APA guidelines for formatting are generally present, however several errors are noted. 0 ptsUnsatisfactory – Beginning( 0 pts) Content shows a below average/poor writing style lacking in elements of appropriate standard English. Frequent errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and word usage. APA guidelines for formatting are not followed. |
15 pts |
Total Points: 60
