Philosophy

profilesieuquaypro18

Suppose someone claimed to have a device that destroyed people's souls, but otherwise had no discernible effect on that person.  How would you evaluate such a claim? Is the claim that people have souls any more plausible?  Why or why not?


Initial Post (approx. 300 word)

  1. Evidence of critical thought
  2. Evidence of a complete understanding of the relevant theories and concepts
  3. Grammar, spelling and length 

Complete after reading the doc file I attached

  • 2 years ago
  • 1
Answer(1)

Purchase the answer to view it

blurred-text
NOT RATED
  • attachment
    order_164275_454567.docx