Philosophy

QUESTION:  "Suppose someone claimed to have a device that destroyed people's souls, but otherwise had no discernible effect on that person.  How would you evaluate such a claim? Is the claim that people have souls any more plausible?  Why or why not? "

THINGS TO KEEP ON MIND:

 

1. Evidence of critical thought
2. Evidence of a complete understanding of the relevant theories and concepts
3. Grammar, spelling and length 
4. The answer must be 350 Words.
5. NO WORK CITED PAGES OR NOTHING.
6. ITS A FREE WRITING QUESTION SO PLEASE NO PLAIGIARISM
7. MUST BE AN ANSWER OF YOUR OWN.