PHARMACOTHERAPY FOR GASTROINTESTINAL AND HEPATOBILIARY DISORDERS

Uchechi

Main

Home >Homework Answsers >Nursing homework help

Nurs

Please see attached.

4 days ago
20.09.2023
15

Report issue

files (1)

PHARMACOTHERAPYFORGASTROINTESTINALANDHEPATOBILIARYDISORDERSquestion.docx

PHARMACOTHERAPYFORGASTROINTESTINALANDHEPATOBILIARYDISORDERSquestion.docx

Case Study: Patient HL comes into the clinic with the following symptoms: nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.

The patient has a history of drug abuse and possible Hepatitis C.

HL is currently taking the following prescription drugs:

· Synthroid 100 mcg daily

· Nifedipine 30 mg daily

· Prednisone 10 mg daily

To Prepare:

· Review the case study assigned by your Instructor for this Assignment

· Reflect on the patient’s symptoms, medical history, and drugs currently prescribed.

· Think about a possible diagnosis for the patient. Consider whether the patient has a disorder related to the gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary system or whether the symptoms are the result of a disorder from another system or other factors, such as pregnancy, drugs, or a psychological disorder.

· Consider an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 4

Write a 1-page paper that addresses the following:

· Explain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis.

· Describe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

· Justify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient. Be specific and provide examples.

· NURS_6521_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6521_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis.

25 to >22.25 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the diagnosis for the patient, including an accurate and thorough rationale for the diagnosis that supports clinical judgment.

22.25 to >19.75 pts

Good

The response provides a basic explanation of 1-2 diagnoses for the patient, including an accurate rationale for the diagnosis that may support clinical judgment.

19.75 to >17.25 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the diagnosis for the patient, including an inaccurate or vague rationale for the diagnosis that may or may not support clinical judgment.

17.25 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the diagnosis for the patient, including an inaccurate and vague rationale for the diagnosis that does not support clinical judgment, or is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

30 to >26.7 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and completely describes in detail an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

26.7 to >23.7 pts

Good

The response describes a basic explanation of the appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

23.7 to >20.7 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

20.7 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeJustify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient. Be specific and provide examples.

30 to >26.7 pts

Excellent

The response provides an accurate, clear, and detailed justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient. ... The response includes specific, accurate, and detailed examples that fully support the justification provided.

26.7 to >23.7 pts

Good

The response provides a basic justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient. ... The response includes only 1-2 examples that fully support the justification provided.

23.7 to >20.7 pts

Fair

The response provides an inaccurate or vague justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient. ... The response may include examples, which may inaccurately or vaguely support the justification provided.

20.7 to >0 pts

Poor

The response provides an inaccurate and vague justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient, or is missing. ... The response does not include examples that support the justification provided, or is missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 to >4.45 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4.45 to >3.95 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3.95 to >3.45 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

3.45 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.45 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4.45 to >3.95 pts

Good

Contains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.95 to >3.45 pts

Fair

Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.45 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.45 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors

4.45 to >3.95 pts

Good

Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors

3.95 to >3.45 pts

Fair

Contains several (3–4) APA format errors

3.45 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors

5 pts

Total Points: 100

PHARMACOTHERAPYFORGASTROINTESTINALANDHEPATOBILIARYDISORDERSquestion.docx

Case Study: Patient HL comes into the clinic with the following symptoms: nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.

The patient has a history of drug abuse and possible Hepatitis C.

HL is currently taking the following prescription drugs:

· Synthroid 100 mcg daily

· Nifedipine 30 mg daily

· Prednisone 10 mg daily

To Prepare:

· Review the case study assigned by your Instructor for this Assignment

· Reflect on the patient’s symptoms, medical history, and drugs currently prescribed.

· Consider an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 4

Write a 1-page paper that addresses the following:

· Explain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis.

· Describe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

· Justify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient. Be specific and provide examples.

· NURS_6521_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6521_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis.

25 to >22.25 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the diagnosis for the patient, including an accurate and thorough rationale for the diagnosis that supports clinical judgment.

22.25 to >19.75 pts

Good

The response provides a basic explanation of 1-2 diagnoses for the patient, including an accurate rationale for the diagnosis that may support clinical judgment.

19.75 to >17.25 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the diagnosis for the patient, including an inaccurate or vague rationale for the diagnosis that may or may not support clinical judgment.

17.25 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the diagnosis for the patient, including an inaccurate and vague rationale for the diagnosis that does not support clinical judgment, or is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

30 to >26.7 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and completely describes in detail an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

26.7 to >23.7 pts

Good

The response describes a basic explanation of the appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

23.7 to >20.7 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

20.7 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeJustify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient. Be specific and provide examples.

30 to >26.7 pts

Excellent

26.7 to >23.7 pts

Good

The response provides a basic justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient. ... The response includes only 1-2 examples that fully support the justification provided.

23.7 to >20.7 pts

Fair

20.7 to >0 pts

Poor

30 pts

5 to >4.45 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4.45 to >3.95 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3.95 to >3.45 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

3.45 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.45 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4.45 to >3.95 pts

Good

Contains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.95 to >3.45 pts

Fair

Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.45 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

5 pts

5 to >4.45 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors

4.45 to >3.95 pts

Good

Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors

3.95 to >3.45 pts

Fair

Contains several (3–4) APA format errors

3.45 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors

5 pts

Total Points: 100

other Questions(10)