Peer Review Explanation A+ rated

 

Review at least two papers. If you do not review at least two  The paper layout could like the following.

Introduction of what you are doing

Peer Reviews

Students #1 Peer Review

Student # 2 answers questions about

Students #1 Paper

a. Was this a disruptive innovation? Why

or Why not?

b. Explain what type of intellectual

capital protection this innovation might require.

c. Explain what creative thinking

process was applied.

d. Explain what type(s) of technology

might be used to support this innovation.

e. Describe how the success of the

innovation will be measured.

Student # 3 answers questions about

Students #1 Paper

a. Was this a disruptive innovation? Why

or Why not?

b. Explain what type of intellectual

capital protection this innovation might require.

c. Explain what creative thinking

process was applied.

d. Explain what type(s) of technology

might be used to support this innovation.

e. Describe how the success of the

innovation will be measured.

Keep this up until everyone has reviewed

each other’s paper. The answers for the questions do not have to be novels.

Just cover the question don't worry about the 400 words. Quality not

quantity!!!