peer review
Peer Feedback:
- Respond to the introduction. We have discussed and applied many possibilities for beginning a piece of writing – evaluate the effectiveness of the one the author has chosen.
- Underline the topic sentence in each paragraph. Are the paragraphs connected and do they evolve the author’s argument?
- Evaluate the integration of textual evidence. Is each source fully introduced and analyzed? Are the sources cited correctly in the text?
- Respond to the organization of the essay (either in the text or at the end, depending on which will be most helpful to the writer).
- Does the author have a clearly stated position in relation to the social issue being conveyed? (ie. Does the essay do more than provide an overview of the situation?)
- Locate and respond to the alternative perspective included. Is it fully explained and evaluated in relation to the primary perspective and position being conveyed?
- Respond to the conclusion. Does the essay end in a way that is satisfying? For example, does it respond to the content in the essay or offer a plan for action?
- Check the works cited page for correctness.
- Comment on the clarity of the sentences. Locate two sentences that could be made more clear and give specific suggestions.
- Respond to the concern the writer expressed (#1 above)
7 years ago
5
Answer(1)![blurred-text]()
![]()
Purchase the answer to view it

NOT RATED
- PeerReview.docx
other Questions(10)
- poultry activity
- Multiple Questions Answers
- due 11/05/2015 - 200 words -
- Economics
- Mid term
- 2 page English paper
- Technical Paper: Object-oriented Programming (OOP)/Event-Driven Programming (EDP) versus Procedural Programming (PP)
- Marketing short essays
- bioethics
- journal How does the film American Revolutionary: the Evolution of Grace Lee Boggs represent interdisciplinary scholarship? What are its sources?