peer editing

 This time, though, instead of answering each and every question, primarily look for problem areas where you can help your author, using the checklist as a guideline.  For example, if the thesis and introduction are perfectly fine, you don't need to comment on them.  I did highlight in boldface some areas that I do want you to specifically address, though.  I also took out the "On Your Second Read of the Paper" section.  And, for the second checklist, I'm mostly looking for formatting and adhering to the assignment issues.  Is the paper 7-10 pages EXCLUDING the title, abstract, and reference pages?  Are there a minimum of 15 sources?  That kind of thing.  And, again, you don't have to comment on every question if you think the paper fulfills the assignment.