Peer Critique Discussion
answer THE FOLLOWING QUESTION 100-200 WORDS IN TOTAL
- What have you liked or disliked about peer critiquing in the past? What makes a good peer critique and what makes a bad peer critique?
- How do you approach the peer critique process? (i.e. Do you focus more on small things like grammar and spelling? Or do you look at the big picture to figure out if the document fulfills its purpose? Maybe you look to see if the paper has a good flow and follows the prompt? These are just examples.)
- What is one piece of advice you would give to your classmates about how to be a good peer editor
- What do you hope to get from your peer editors in this class?
5 years ago
5
Answer(1)![blurred-text]()
![]()
Purchase the answer to view it

NOT RATED
- order_153836_416798.docx
other Questions(10)
- 1. Discuss the division of labor according to gender, including the changes that occurred during the transition from nomadic to agricultural societies.
- Spanish self introduction translation
- Outline of "Risk Management Audit"
- Managerial Accounting 4
- Identify and discuss the changes that have been imposed upon law enforcement agencies as a result of the “war on terror.”
- Miller (2001) pointed out other perspectives on morality that are overlooked in traditional theories of morality, such as moralities of...
- Research Plan and Annotated Bibliography
- Assignment 3: Resource Review
- Analysis the HRM of the Joint-venture Company(Sunbury’s).For this assessment you will take the role of a HR manager, taking part in an internal evaluation of your international organisation's human resource strategy and as a result produce a recommendatio
- right to work in the US