PAPER

Module 4 Antecedents in Performance Management

Describe some of the antecedents available in your current (or past) workplace. Were they effective for supporting staff behavior? Why or why not, and (based on the materials in this module) how would you recommend changing them to make them more effective?Remember to review the Reflection Paper rubric and instructions in the Important Course Information module.Additionally, please include LINKS or DOIs to any articles or books referenced outside of the assigned readings as part of your APA citation (as is required when using web-based referencesLinks to an external site.). Failing to do

Daniels and Bailey (2014)

Characteristics of Effective Antecedent ,Wine (2018Considerations for using

Antecedent InterventionsWine (2018)Job Aid

Task Clarification,A Checklist for Checklists (Gawande, 2009) (Daniels and Bailey, 2014) class you needed to added extra reference out of he class

category5 points3 points0 pointsReflection Length* *(excludes reference section and direct quotes from references that are longer than 5 words)Reflection paper content was greater than 150 words.Reflection paper content was between 100-149 words.Reflection paper content was less than 99 words.Grammar, Usage, and SpellingReflection paper contained less than 2 grammar, usage, or spelling errors.Reflection paper contained 3-4 grammar, usage, or spelling errors.Reflection paper contained more than 5 grammar,usage, or spelling errors and proofreading was not apparent.References and Utilization of Outside ResourcesThe author used references from peer-reviewed behavioral sources in APA format and cited one or moreoriginal behavioral references, outside of the assigned readings. Hyperlinks to the cited external references are provided.The author used references in APA format of assigned readings but did not include an additional peer-reviewed behavioral reference or did not include a hyperlink to the externally-cited reference.The author neither utilized APA format for referenced material used nor cited a peer-reviewed behavioral reference.Addressing the PromptThe author’s reflection paper clearly responds to the assignment prompt, develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically, and supports them through empirical writing.The author’s reflection paper clearly responds to the assignment prompt, develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically, and supports them through empirical writing.The author’s reflection paper does not correspond with the assignment prompt, mainly discusses personal opinions, irrelevant information, or information is presented with limited logic and lack of development and organization of ideas.ApplicationThe author’s post clearly demonstrates application and relationship to the week’s assigned reading/topic.The author’s post refers to the assigned topic/readingtangentially but does not demonstrate application.The author’s post does not demonstrate application of the week’s assigned topic/reading.

Late reflection papers will adhere to the general submission policy found on the Virtual Course Schedule