PADM 700 Public Administration Ethics, Statesmanship, & Governance 6

profileSweetness668

  Governance in Public Administration: Case Studies 

  • 2 years ago
  • 4
files (6)

DiscussionGradingRubric1.pdf

Criteria Ratings Points

Thread

Content

15 to >13.0 pts

Advanced

• Each question/prompt is answered thoroughly and logically. • Major points are stated clearly and effectively. • Clear, logical flow to post; stayed on topic.

13 to >11.0 pts

Proficient

• Each question/prompt is answered. • Major points are stated clearly and effectively for the most part. • Clear, logical and focused for the most part.

11 to >0.0 pts

Developing

• Not all facets of the prompt/questions are answered. • Lack of clarity, coherence, logic and focus in key areas.

0 pts

Not Present

15 pts

Thread

Research Engagement

13 to >10.0 pts

Advanced

• Ideas from all the required reading and presentations from the Module: Week and 2 scholarly sources are integrated. • Relates topic to Scripture/biblical principles where appropriate.

10 to >8.0 pts

Proficient

• Ideas from most the required reading and presentations from the Module: Week and 2 scholarly sources are integrated. • Scripture/biblical principles are included but unfocused at times.

8 to >0.0 pts

Developing

• Ideas from few of the required reading and presentations from the Module: Week and 2 scholarly sources are integrated. • Missing Biblical integration.

0 pts

Not Present

13 pts

Reply

Content

15 to >13.0 pts

Advanced

• 2 unique interaction posts with classmates • One reply posted to each of 2 classmates’ threads. • Moves the conversation forward with new ideas, research, and analysis. • Student’s response delivered in a thorough, thoughtful, and analytical manner with the student’s position clearly evident.

13 to >11.0 pts

Proficient

• At least 2 unique interaction posts with classmates • One reply posted to each of 2 classmates’ threads. • New ideas, research, and analysis are not always included. • Some commentary is repetitive from one reply to the next. • At times, reply posts do not seem to actually build upon classmate’s post.

11 to >0.0 pts

Developing

• Missing one or more reply posts. • Reply posts are redundant. • Little in the way of new ideas, research, and analysis are not always included.

0 pts

Not Present

15 pts

Discussion Grading Rubric | PADM700_C01_202440

Criteria Ratings Points

Reply

Research Engagement

10 to >8.0 pts

Advanced

• 2 unique interaction posts with classmates • One reply posted to each of 2 classmates’ threads. • Relates topic to Scripture/biblical principles where appropriate. • Contains abundant citations from required reading, presentations, and 2 scholarly sources.

8 to >6.0 pts

Proficient

• 2 unique interaction posts with classmates • One reply posted to each of 2 classmates’ threads. • Scripture/biblical principles are included but unfocused at times. • Contains some citations from reading, presentations, and scholarly sources.

6 to >0.0 pts

Developing

• Missing one or more reply posts. • Missing Biblical integration. • Limited citations from the required reading and presentations.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Grammar, Spelling, & APA

15 to >13.0 pts

Advanced

Minimal to no errors in grammar, spelling, or APA.

13 to >11.0 pts

Proficient

Some errors in grammar, spelling, or APA.

11 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Numerous errors in grammar, spelling, or APA.

0 pts

Not Present

15 pts

Word Count 7 to >5.0 pts

Advanced

Appropriate word count: 450-500 words for thread; 200–250 words per reply.

5 to >3.0 pts

Proficient

100 words more or less than the required length.

3 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Over 100 words more or less than the required length.

0 pts

Not Present

7 pts

Total Points: 75

Discussion Grading Rubric | PADM700_C01_202440