P5
3 years ago
20
Part5.docx
Part5.docx
Due date : 10/12
Memo Style. APA no plagiarism. 3 Scholarly sources. 2 pages.
Vendor schemes can be subcategorized as either fictitious vendor or pass-through
schemes. With fictitious vendor schemes the victim company receives nothing from the
fictitious vendor except the bogus invoices. Thus, the fraud loss is determined by adding
up the total payments made to the vendor. A pass-through scheme is one in which the
fraudster sets up a shell company as an unnecessary intermediary between a legitimate
vendor and the victim company and makes an unauthorized profit on the transaction.
Accordingly, with a pass-through scheme the victim company is actually receiving
something in exchange for payments made to the shell company. Thus, the fraud loss is
the amount of the unauthorized profit made by the fraudster. With pass-through schemes
the victim company receives invoices from the shell company instead of from the vendor
that is actually providing the products or services listed on the invoices. Based on your
understanding of how the two schemes work, develop a strategy for determining whether
the fraudster is perpetrating a fictitious vendor scheme or a pass-through scheme. Using
the most suspicious vendor’s taxpayer id number as the password, carefully examine the
“Bank Statement” file which contains the bank statement and copies of the cancelled
checks. Determine whether the suspicious vendor you have identified is a fictitious
vendor scheme or a pass-through scheme. Explain and defend your answer in Memo
format and submit it to your instructor for grading