Nursing willy-assignment week 2

RUBRICDECISIONMAKING.pdf

• Integration of Knowledge   25% of total result          ExcellentThe paper demonstrates that the author understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas.    25       SatisfactoryThe paper demonstrates that the author, mostly, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper.    20       UnsatisfactoryThe paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course    15       UnacceptableThe paper does not demonstrate that the author has understood, and applied concepts learned in the course.    10        

• Topic Focus   25% of total result   

      ExcellentThe topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by a statement of a position or hypothesis. The topic is consistently well thought out, thorough offers insight into the topic, and includes cited evidence to support the topic.    25       SatisfactoryThe topic is focused but lacks direction. The paper is about a specific topic, but the writer has not established a position. The topic is somewhat well thought out, offers limited insight into the topic, but does not include cited evidence to support the topic.    20       UnsatisfactoryThe topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment.    15       UnacceptableThe topic is unclear or unrelated to the discussion topic with little or no supporting evidence.    10        

• Depth of Discussion and Cohesiveness   25% of total result     

    ExcellentIn-depth discussion and elaboration in all sections of the paper. Ties together information from all sources. Paper flows from one issue to the next with APA-approved subheadings. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources Mostly, it ties together information from all sources. There is an introduction and a conclusion in the submission.    25       SatisfactoryIn-depth discussion and elaboration in most sections of the paper. Mostly, it ties together information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness- APA subheadings were not utilized throughout the paper consistently. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. There is an introduction and a conclusion in the submission.    20       UnsatisfactoryThe writer has omitted content. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s ideas excessively. Sometimes ties together information from all sources. The paper does not flow- the paper is not developed at the graduate level of APA formatting- no subheadings, etc... Disjointedness is apparent. The author’s writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship between material obtained from all sources. There is an introduction and/or conclusion in the submission, but not both.    15       UnacceptableCursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections It does not tie together

information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate an understanding of any relationship. There is NO introduction or conclusion in the submission.    10        

• Sources   7% of total result          Excellent4 current sources are used and are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature and acknowledged as such if they are cited. All websites utilized are authoritative.    7       SatisfactoryUsed 3 current sources, which are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All websites utilized are authoritative.    5.6      UnsatisfactoryUsed 2 current sources which are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All websites utilized are credible.    4.2      UnacceptableFewer than 2 current sources are used which are peer-

reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. Not all websites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current.    2.8       

• APA adherence and Citation in text  6% of total result          ExcellentFewer than 5 incomplete citations and/or quotations, and APA format errors. The paper is developed using APA-approved headings throughout the paper.    6       SatisfactoryMore than 5 but fewer than 10 incomplete citations and/ or quotations, and APA format errors. The paper is developed using an introduction APA-approved heading- but no headings within the rest of the paper.    4.8      UnsatisfactoryMore than 10 incomplete citations and/or quotations, or APA format errors. APA formatting is not developed at the graduate level.    3.6      UnacceptableThe citation style is inconsistent or incorrect. It does not cite sources. The paper submitted is NOT in APA Format. 

  2.4       

• Spelling and Grammar   12% of total result          ExcellentFewer than 5 grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors The required word count has been met.    12       SatisfactoryMore than 5 but fewer than 10 grammatical, spelling, capitalization & punctuation errors The required word count is 25 words below the minimum required count.    9.6      UnsatisfactoryMore than 10 grammatical, spelling, capitalization & punctuation errors The required word count is 50 words below the minimum required count.    7.2      UnacceptableAn unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes. The required word count is more than 50 words below the minimum required count.    4.8

INSTRUCTIONS.pdf

Advanced Practice Nursing: Clinical Decision-Making and Leadership Essay Overview: This assignment invites you to explore the evolution of clinical decision-making as you transition from bedside nursing to advanced practice roles. In your essay, you will critically analyze and compare the decision-making skills, leadership approaches, and ethical considerations required at the bedside versus those required of advanced practice nurses (APNs), such as nurse practitioners (NPs) and nurse leaders. Your discussion must integrate the following course outcomes throughout your analysis:

• Outcome 1: Demonstrate understanding of the impact of legal and ethical issues, and healthcare policy on decision-making in a real, complex healthcare environment.

• Outcome 2: Synthesize multidimensional approaches of decision-making learned throughout the course to evaluate patient outcomes.

• Outcome 3: Apply thoughtful leadership approaches to implement successful changes in your practice.

• Outcome 4: Apply multiple decision-making approaches—including transformational leadership principles—in actual situations to demonstrate confidence in decision making.

Assignment Instructions Writing Requirements:

• Format: Prepare your submission as an essay. The document must include a cover page, clearly structured level headings (in adherence with APA 7th Edition standards), and a reference list.

• Length: The primary text should be a minimum of 3 pages (excluding the cover page and references).

• Style: Write at a graduate level using formal academic language. Your analysis should be thorough, critical, and reflective of the course readings and other current academic literature.

• APA Guidelines: All in-text citations and the reference list must follow APA 7th Edition guidelines.

Essay Topics and Guiding Questions Your essay should address the following topics and questions: Transitioning from Bedside Nursing to Advanced Practice:

• As nurses, you have all learned the importance of clinical decision-making, critical thinking, and clinical judgment for ensuring safe and effective patient care.

• Question: As you move into your advanced practice role—whether in leadership, management, or as an NP— how do these decision-making processes change? Does your approach need to shift, and if so, why?

Comparing Skill Sets: • Question: Is there a difference between the decision-

making and leadership skills required by bedside nurses compared to those needed by APNs?

• Guidance: Support your discussion with rationale drawn from the course readings and relevant academic literature. Consider using examples from practice scenarios to highlight these differences.

Critical Decision-Making for Future Roles: • Question: As you transition into your role as an APN,

which clinical decision-making skills are most critical— especially for nurses planning to become NPs versus those pursuing nurse leadership?

• Guidance: Present a rationale for your choices, referencing course readings and scholarly research. Reflect on how multidimensional decision-making approaches can influence patient outcomes.

Standardized Decision-Making Tools: • Question: What standardized decision-making tool has

been developed to guide nurses at all levels in making practice decisions?

• Guidance: Explain why this tool was created, its intended purpose, and how it standardizes decision-making across varying clinical settings.

• Question: How would you apply this tool in your current or future role as an APN? Provide specific examples of its application in real clinical scenarios.

Additional Tools and the Consensus Model for APRNs: • Question: Are there other standardized clinical

decision-making tools available for APNs and NPs? Evaluate whether these tools are employed consistently across care settings and offer a rationale for their use (or limitations).

• Question: Describe the role of the Consensus Model for APRNs and discuss how it informs decision-making processes in advanced practice settings.

Submission Requirements • Content: Ensure all discussion questions are

addressed comprehensively and supported with both course readings and additional academic sources.

• Structure: • Introduction: Provide an overview of your essay’s

scope, the significance of the transition to an advanced practice role, and a brief outline of what will be discussed.

• Body: Develop each question in dedicated sections with clear APA-style headings.

• Conclusion: Summarize and synthesize the main points of your discussion, highlighting the importance of legal, ethical, and policy considerations in advanced clinical decision-making and leadership.

• References: Include a minimum of four scholarly sources published within the past five years. Follow APA guidelines for all citations and references.

• Formatting: Maintain APA style consistency throughout —this includes using a 12-point Times New Roman font, 1- inch margins, and double-spaced text.

- NO MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM ALLOWED - DUE DATE JULY 3, 2025 -CORRECT GRAMMAR AND SPELLING