Nursing Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety Assignment
Minicaa
10 months ago
23
files (2)SystemsEngineeringInitiative.docx
Rubric-SystemsEngineeringInitiativeforPatientSafetySEIPS.pdf
SystemsEngineeringInitiative.docx
Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) Assignment Instructions
Human error is a concern that affects every aspect of health care and is something that providers must account for when creating systems and processes to ensure patient safety. The Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) was created as a quality improvement tool to better understand the elements that threaten safety and to recommend ways organizations can improve quality outcomes by reducing risk.
Write a 1,250- to 1,500-word chapter for a training manual, including graphics, that illustrates the following aspects as they relate to SEIPS:
· Describe the seven types of errors that can occur in a health care environment and provide examples of each. Explain the impact that errors have on an organization. Describe measures that could have been implemented to improve patient safety and reduce the occurrence of each error you described.
· Discuss the framework of the SEIPS tool and how it is used within a health care environment. Compare the SEIPS tool with one other error-reduction strategy presented in the textbook and explain when each tool might be applied.
· Explain the positive effect that the SEIPS tool can have on the reduction of errors in high-risk health care settings.
· Discuss the relationship between CQI and SEIPS in producing quality outcomes for health care organizations. How does improving quality outcomes with a patient-centric focus align with Christian worldview principles?
References as well please
Rubric-SystemsEngineeringInitiativeforPatientSafetySEIPS.pdf
9/26/25, 8:41 AM
Page 1 of 2about:srcdoc
Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) - Rubric Total 90 points
Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Insufficient 3. Approaching 4. Acceptable 5. Target
Seven Health Care Errors
and Corresponding
Preventive Measures
Seven Health Care Errors
and Corresponding
Preventive Measures
0 points
A description of the seven
types of errors that can
occur in a health care
environment and the
impact errors have on an
organization, including
preventive measures that
could reduce the
occurrence of each error, is
not included.
11.7 points
A description of the seven
types of errors that can
occur in a health care
environment and the
impact errors have on an
organization, including
preventive measures that
could reduce the
occurrence of each error, is
present, but the
information provided is
incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
13.5 points
A description of the seven
types of errors that can
occur in a health care
environment and the
impact errors have on an
organization, including
preventive measures that
could reduce the
occurrence of each error, is
present, but minimal detail
or support is provided.
15.3 points
A description of the seven
types of errors that can
occur in a health care
environment and the
impact errors have on an
organization, including
preventive measures that
could reduce the
occurrence of each error, is
provided, with appropriate
details and support.
18 points
A description of the seven
types of errors that can
occur in a health care
environment and the
impact errors have on an
organization, including
preventive measures that
could reduce the
occurrence of each error, is
thoroughly explored and
clearly explained with
relevant details and
support.
Comparison of the SEIPS
Tool With Another Health
Care Error-Reduction
Strategy
Comparison of the SEIPS
Tool With Another Health
Care Error-Reduction
Strategy
0 points
A discussion of the
framework of the SEIPS
tool and how it is used
within a health care
environment, as well as a
comparison of the SEIPS
tool with one other error-
reduction strategy that
explains when each tool
might be applied, is not
included.
11.7 points
A discussion of the
framework of the SEIPS
tool and how it is used
within a health care
environment, as well as a
comparison of the SEIPS
tool with one other error-
reduction strategy that
explains when each tool
might be applied, is
present, but the
information provided is
incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
13.5 points
A discussion of the
framework of the SEIPS
tool and how it is used
within a health care
environment, as well as a
comparison of the SEIPS
tool with one other error-
reduction strategy that
explains when each tool
might be applied, is
present, but minimal detail
or support is provided.
15.3 points
A discussion of the
framework of the SEIPS
tool and how it is used
within a health care
environment, as well as a
comparison of the SEIPS
tool with one other error-
reduction strategy that
explains when each tool
might be applied, is
provided, with appropriate
details and support.
18 points
A discussion of the
framework of the SEIPS
tool and how it is used
within a health care
environment, as well as a
comparison of the SEIPS
tool with one other error-
reduction strategy that
explains when each tool
might be applied, is
thoroughly explored and
clearly explained with
relevant details and
support.
Effect of SEIPS on the
Reduction of Errors in
Health Care Setting
Effect of SEIPS on the
Reduction of Errors in
Health Care Setting
0 points
An explanation of the
effect the SEIPS tool can
have on the reduction of
errors in high-risk health
care settings is not
included.
11.7 points
An explanation of the
effect the SEIPS tool can
have on the reduction of
errors in high-risk health
care settings is present,
but the information
provided is incomplete,
inaccurate, or otherwise
deficient.
13.5 points
An explanation of the
effect the SEIPS tool can
have on the reduction of
errors in high-risk health
care settings is present,
but minimal detail or
support is provided.
15.3 points
An explanation of the
effect the SEIPS tool can
have on the reduction of
errors in high-risk health
care settings is provided,
with appropriate details
and support.
18 points
An explanation of the
effect the SEIPS tool can
have on the reduction of
errors in high-risk health
care settings is thoroughly
explored and clearly
explained with relevant
details and support.
Relationship Between
SEIPS and CQI in
Improving Quality
Outcomes for Patients
Relationship Between
SEIPS and CQI in Improving
Quality Outcomes for
Patients
0 points
A discussion of the
relationship between SEIPS
and continuous quality
improvement in improving
quality outcomes for
patients and how these are
aligned with the Christian
worldview is not included.
11.7 points
A discussion of the
relationship between SEIPS
and continuous quality
improvement in improving
quality outcomes for
patients and how these are
aligned with the Christian
worldview is present, but
the information provided is
incomplete, inaccurate, or
otherwise deficient.
13.5 points
A discussion of the
relationship between SEIPS
and continuous quality
improvement in improving
quality outcomes for
patients and how these are
aligned with the Christian
worldview is present, but
minimal detail or support
is provided.
15.3 points
A discussion of the
relationship between SEIPS
and continuous quality
improvement in improving
quality outcomes for
patients and how these are
aligned with the Christian
worldview is provided, with
appropriate details and
support.
18 points
A discussion of the
relationship between SEIPS
and continuous quality
improvement in improving
quality outcomes for
patients and how these are
aligned with the Christian
worldview is thoroughly
explored and clearly
explained with relevant
details and support.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling,
capitalization, punctuation,
grammar, language use,
sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or
syntax are pervasive and
impede meaning. Incorrect
language choice or
sentence structure errors
are found throughout.
5.85 points
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors are
present. Inconsistencies in
language choice or
sentence structure are
recurrent.
6.75 points
Occasional mechanical
errors are present.
Language choice is
generally appropriate.
Varied sentence structure
is attempted.
7.65 points
Few mechanical errors are
present. Suitable language
choice and sentence
structure are used.
9 points
No mechanical errors are
present. Appropriate
language choice and
sentence structure are
used throughout.
9/26/25, 8:41 AM
Page 2 of 2about:srcdoc
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style,
such as APA, MLA, etc., for
college, subject, and level;
documents sources using
citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography,
etc., appropriate to
assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not
used. No documentation of
sources is provided.
5.85 points
Appropriate format is
attempted, but some
elements are missing.
Frequent errors in
documentation of sources
are evident.
6.75 points
Appropriate format and
documentation are used,
although there are some
obvious errors.
7.65 points
Appropriate format and
documentation are used,
with only minor errors.
9 points
No errors in formatting or
documentation are
present.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
