Nursing Nursing Assignment

profileJess98

Instructions attached below, due 7/19 10 PM 6-8 pages, include AI report and plagiarism report 

  • 3 days ago
  • 15
files (1)

Week3Assignmentinstructions.docx

Week 3 Assignment: Literature Search Review

Submission Type: 6-to-8-page paper

Details: This Literature Search Review should be 6-8 pages (not including the title or references pages)

Part 1

Review the systematic search strategies and examples in Chapter 3 before completing this assignment.

Part 2

Choose one PICOT question from the Week 2 Assignment. Complete the tasks below to address this question with the following components:

· Title Page: Use APA style

· Introduction: Summarize the primary intent of your paper

· Key Words: Identify five to seven keywords from your PICOT Question.

· Databases: Determine at least three appropriate databases you plan to search and explain why they are applicable.

· Synonyms: Identify at least two synonyms for each PICOT component.

· Screen Shots: Conduct your search using the identified keywords and synonyms from identified databases. Include screenshots of the process.

· Subject Headings: Identify at least two subject headings for each PICOT component from the initial hits in databases. 

· Total Yield per Database: The total yield for each combined keyword, synonym, and subject heading across all PICOT terms combined using the Boolean connector AND and OR.  

· Limiters: Define and apply at least three appropriate limiters (e.g., age, language, human, etc.). I

· Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria: Define and apply your inclusion/exclusion criteria to further narrow results. Final Yield: Identify the final yield for all the PICOT terms across all databases.

· Final Yield: Identify the final yield for all the PICOT terms across all databases.

· Document: Using APA format, organize and list ten or more studies (at least 10) related to this question.

See the rubric for specific grading criteria.

Rubric

Week 3 Literature Review Search Rubric

Week 3 Literature Review Search Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Title Page and Introduction

5 pts

Meets Expectations

Includes a completed title page and a clear and concise introduction reflecting the intent of the paper

4 pts

Approaches Expectations

Includes an almost complete title page and a general introduction reflecting the intent of the paper

3 pts

Needs Improvement

Includes incomplete title page and vague introduction that does not specify the intent of the paper

0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Misses the title page and/or the introduction

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Keywords

10 pts

Meets Expectations

Identifies five to seven relevant keywords from the PICOT question.

8 pts

Approaches Expectations

Identifies three to five relevant keywords from the PICOT question.

7 pts

Needs Improvement

Identifies one to two relevant keywords from the PICOT question.

0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Identifies no relevant keywords from the PICOT question.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Databases

10 pts

Meets Expectations

Identifies at least three appropriate databases and explains why they are appropriate.

8 pts

Approaches Expectations

Identifies at least three appropriate databases but does not explain why they are appropriate.

7 pts

Needs Improvement

Identifies one to two appropriate databases and explains why they are appropriate.

0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Identifies no appropriate databases or identifies one database but does not explain why it is appropriate.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Synonyms

10 pts

Meets Expectations

Identifies at least two relevant synonyms for each of the PICO components.

8 pts

Approaches Expectations

Identifies at least two relevant synonyms for some but not all PICO components; or identifies only one relevant synonym for each of the PICO components.

7 pts

Needs Improvement

Identifies only one relevant synonym for each of the PICO components; or identifies irrelevant synonyms for the PICO components.

0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Identifies no synonyms or identifies irrelevant synonyms for most of the PICO components.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Search evidence

20 pts

Meets Expectations

Provides adequate screenshots of the search showing the databases and results.

0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Provides no screenshots of the search showing the databases and results.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Subject headings

10 pts

Meets Expectations

Identifies at least eight subject headings (2 for each of the PICO components) from the initial hits in databases.

8 pts

Approaches Expectations

Identifies at least six subject headings (1-2 for each of the PICO components) from the initial hits in databases.

7 pts

Needs Improvement

Identifies at least four subject headings (1 for each of the PICO components) from the initial hits in databases.

5 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Identifies less than four subject headings from the initial hits in databases.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Total yields

30 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectations

Includes all total yields per database by combining the yields for each keyword, synonym, and subject headings across all PICO terms using the Boolean connectors AND and OR.

24 to >21.0 pts

Approaches Expectations

Includes most of the total yields per database by combining the yields for each keyword, synonym, and subject headings across all PICO terms with the Boolean connectors AND and OR.

21 to >7.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Includes some of the total yields per database by combining the yields for each keyword, synonym, and subject headings across all PICO terms with either the Boolean connector AND or OR.

7 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Includes little or none of the total yields per database; fails to use the Boolean connector AND or OR.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Limiters

10 pts

Meets Expectations

Defines and applies at least three appropriate limiters.

8.5 pts

Approaches Expectations

Defines and applies two appropriate limiters

7 pts

Needs Improvement

Defines only one appropriate limiter.

0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not define or apply any appropriate limiters.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Inclusion/exclusion criteria

10 pts

Approaches Expectations

Defines and applies at least three relevant inclusion/exclusion criteria.

8.5 pts

Meets Expectations

Defines and applies two relevant inclusion/exclusion criteria.

7 pts

Needs Improvement

Defines and applies only one relevant inclusion/exclusion criterion.

0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not define or apply any inclusion/exclusion criteria.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Final yields (studies)

20 pts

Meets Expectations

Identifies at least ten final yields for all PICOT terms across all databases; at least six of the studies are quantitative; at least three of the quantitative studies are randomized controlled trials (RCT).

16 pts

Approaches Expectations

Identifies seven to nine final yields for all PICOT terms across all databases; at least five of the studies are quantitative; at least three of the quantitative studies are randomized controlled trials (RCT).

14 pts

Needs Improvement

Identifies four to six final yields for all PICOT terms across all databases; at least three of the studies are quantitative; at least two of the quantitative studies are randomized controlled trials (RCT).

8 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Identifies less than four final yields for all PICOT terms across all databases; less than two of the studies are quantitative; or none of the studies are randomized controlled trials (RCT).

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Organization and writing

15 pts

Meets Expectations

Writes in a scholarly manner with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors. Follows the rules of APA formatting.

13 pts

Approaches Expectations

Writes in a scholarly manner with minimal grammar, spelling, or syntax errors. Follows the rules of APA formatting.

11 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Writes in a scholarly manner with several grammar, spelling, or syntax errors. Breaks minor rules of APA formatting.

8.53 pts

Needs Improvement

Does not write in a scholarly manner. Commits many errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax. Does not follow rules for APA formatting.

15 pts

Total Points: 150